Religion and Ethics Forum
Religion and Ethics Discussion => Christian Topic => Topic started by: Bubbles on October 05, 2015, 04:52:57 PM
-
.
-
The most important thing to me is.
"For God so loved the world, he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life. " John 3:16
-
God.
-
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tkr9p09k01I
Says it all, really.
-
Interesting question and for me the answer is so broad with so many points that I could not begin to list them,I suppose I am in awe of my creator.
~TW~
-
What matters most to you?
Just one thing.......not a list... Ok? :)
Then look at what you think is important for you to get there or to achieve it?
( if you really have to answer " Christ" please give some idea of who and what this person is like and why you value your " Christ " and why you feel that is the answer.)
Love based in truth.
-
The most important thing to me is.
"For God so loved the world, he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life. " John 3:16
Which is a HUGE LIE, if the deeds attributed to it had any credence!
-
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tkr9p09k01I
Says it all, really.
Unfortunately my iPad won't let me watch it.
:(
OK, here are the lyrics - and I can print them without worrying about copyright.
This is a song by Graham Kendrick, loosely based on words by Paul in Philippians 3.
All I once held dear, built my life upon
All this world reveres, and wars to own
All I once thought gain I have counted loss
Spent and worthless now, compared to this
Knowing you, Jesus
Knowing you, there is no greater thing
You're my all, you're the best
You're my joy, my righteousness
And I love you, Lord
Now my heart's desire is to know you more
To be found in you and known as yours
To possess by faith what I could not earn
All-surpassing gift of righteousness
Knowing You, Jesus....
Oh, to know the power of your risen life
And to know You in Your sufferings
To become like you in your death, my Lord
So with you to live and never die
Knowing You, Jesus....
-
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tkr9p09k01I
Says it all, really.
What he said
-
Excuse me floo,
You wrote a prayer poem when you became a grandma. In that poem you thank and pray to the Lord. Who is this Lord you thanked and asked help from? Is it the same Lord that John 3:16 is about, or was it just another of your con games, a way of getting something of yours published?
-
Excuse me floo,
You wrote a prayer poem when you became a grandma. In that poem you thank and pray to the Lord. Who is this Lord you thanked and asked help from? Is it the same Lord that John 3:16 is about, or was it just another of your con games, a way of getting something of yours published?
Funny I don't remember that, are you hallucinating?
-
Come on Floo, be adult, don't pretend you didn't write a first time grandma's prayer. You even claim it's copyrighted. Anybody can google it, you put it out there for all to read. I ask again, who is this Lord you thank and pray to in that poem? But whatever, just know I'm on to you and everybody can have a look because YOU made it all public. I'll let your cons speak for themselves, I have no more to add about it.
-
You are a LIAR! I have just looked up the poem, 'Child of my child' I wrote in 2002 when my first grandchild was born, there is not one mention of the flipping deity in it!
-
Google a first time grandma's prayer and then come back here and tell me that isn't you. Grow up and own it!
-
Google a first time grandma's prayer and then come back here and tell me that isn't you. Grow up and own it!
I googled it and there are loads of them, to which one are you referring?
-
No there is not. There is only one, a first time grandma's prayer. Now who is this Lord you thank in your prayer of 2002?
-
No there is not. There is only one, a first time grandma's prayer. Now who is this Lord you thank in your prayer of 2002?
There are loads of prayers on that site!
-
Had a look at Anch's link nice photos but there was some prat moaning and groaning about something or the other in the background spoiling the lovely views.
ippy
-
Had a look at Anch's link nice photos but there was some prat moaning and groaning about something or the other in the background spoiling the lovely views.
ippy
Then read the lyrics then.
We wouldn't want the views to distract you.
-
No floo, now stop it. There is only one prayer that comes up when one googles, a first time grandma's prayer. One must google it because you claim at the end that it is copyrighted and I don't want to infringe you. (snork) You need to stop playing dumb here, I know you are very smart and calculating until you start trying to cover up by acting like you have no idea.
Who is this Lord you thank in your, FIRST TIME GRANDMA'S PRAYER, copyright 2002? Why do you thank this Lord and pray for help, if this Lord is as nasty as you round around here claiming he must be?
-
https://www.google.co.uk/#q=first+time+grandma%27s+prayer
-
ooo I found it try putting " " around the search terms.
-
What matters most to you?
Just one thing.......not a list... Ok? :)
Then look at what you think is important for you to get there or to achieve it?
( if you really have to answer " Christ" please give some idea of who and what this person is like and why you value your " Christ " and why you feel that is the answer.)
Shouldn't the answer to "What is the most important thing to you as a christian"? be, to ignore the fact that there is no evidence that supports the idea that any kind of god or gods exist or ever have existed
ippy
-
No Rose, floo claims to have given up on God back when she was young, according to her God didn't respond to her prayers when she was having a difficult time.
After going over the Brother Doli poltergeist tale, BBC, and other investigations, this prayerful poem by floo fits right in. It's baloney, like what she accuses Sass of writing.
-
No Rose, floo claims to have given up on God back when she was young, according to her God didn't respond to her prayers when she was having a difficult time.
After going over the Brother Doli poltergeist tale, BBC, and other investigations, this prayerful poem by floo fits right in. It's baloney, like what she accuses Sass of writing.
Indeed, the word, "hypocrite," springs to mind!
-
No Rose, floo claims to have given up on God back when she was young, according to her God didn't respond to her prayers when she was having a difficult time.
After going over the Brother Doli poltergeist tale, BBC, and other investigations, this prayerful poem by floo fits right in. It's baloney, like what she accuses Sass of writing.
Indeed, the word, "hypocrite," springs to mind!
Eh ?
Wasn't it you who on another thread is arguing that people should refrain from personal attacks, and rather to stick to debating the ideas ? If you are happy to indulge those tactics yourself then you can't really deny the same to others.
-
No Rose, floo claims to have given up on God back when she was young, according to her God didn't respond to her prayers when she was having a difficult time.
After going over the Brother Doli poltergeist tale, BBC, and other investigations, this prayerful poem by floo fits right in. It's baloney, like what she accuses Sass of writing.
Indeed, the word, "hypocrite," springs to mind!
Eh ?
Wasn't it you who on another thread is arguing that people should refrain from personal attacks, and rather to stick to debating the ideas ? If you are happy to indulge those tactics yourself then you can't really deny the same to others.
A statement of fact is not a personal attack. Floo consistently derides Sass. She rarely misses the opportunity to make disparaging comments. And it turns out she is far from free of "unusual" goings-on herself. So she is the last person to throw brick-bats. Perhaps you should keep more up to date before throwing in your tuppence worth.
-
And in a statement of fact Bashful is a hypocrite
-
Sass give as good as she gets, I have no problem in challenging her nonsense!
-
Indeed, the word, "hypocrite," springs to mind!
Eh ?
Wasn't it you who on another thread is arguing that people should refrain from personal attacks, and rather to stick to debating the ideas ? If you are happy to indulge those tactics yourself then you can't really deny the same to others.
A statement of fact is not a personal attack. Floo consistently derides Sass. She rarely misses the opportunity to make disparaging comments. And it turns out she is far from free of "unusual" goings-on herself. So she is the last person to throw brick-bats. Perhaps you should keep more up to date before throwing in your tuppence worth.
Ah, so when others lob invective around, that is hurtful, something to be avoided, but when you do it, it is a statement of fact and therefore OK. I don't think you are suddenly the arbiter of what is factual.
-
Sass give as good as she gets, I have no problem in challenging her nonsense!
And there you go again. What is nonsense to you, is precious to her, and to constantly, and I mean constantly, mock her is both cruel and ignorant. If she were to say, for example, she'd seen images of the Lord, you'd drop on her like a ton of bricks. Of course, you never claim to see images of anything. If you did I wonder if people would make a point of constantly deriding you?
-
And in a statement of fact Bashful is a hypocrite
And there we see precisely what I have been talking bout: you are only here to attack and criticise. Anything positive to say today? Thought not!
-
It's perfectly possible to disagree with Sass's stance on faith - and I do - vehemently.
But needless mockery of that stance solves nothing.
-
Sass give as good as she gets, I have no problem in challenging her nonsense!
Why should she, or anybody, have to be the target of your ill-founded invective, day in and day out? do you never rest from it?
-
I think there are a couple of Christian posters that can sometimes come across as judgemental and all knowing. :-X
I suspect, they set people off.
To some people the combination is a bit like a red flag to a bull ;)
That's "red rag to a bull," actually. ;)
-
It's perfectly possible to disagree with Sass's stance on faith - and I do - vehemently.
But needless mockery of that stance solves nothing.
Sass often puts the boot in first! ;D
-
It's perfectly possible to disagree with Sass's stance on faith - and I do - vehemently.
But needless mockery of that stance solves nothing.
Sass often puts the boot in first! ;D
And.....?
You're not the only target for that 'boot', floo.
Retaliation in similar vein solves nothing.
-
It's perfectly possible to disagree with Sass's stance on faith - and I do - vehemently.
But needless mockery of that stance solves nothing.
Sass often puts the boot in first! ;D
And.....?
You're not the only target for that 'boot', floo.
Retaliation in similar vein solves nothing.
Probably not, but where she is concerned it is so very satisfying! ;D
-
Sass give as good as she gets, I have no problem in challenging her nonsense!
So, you have no problem with your 'nonsense' (which it often is, by the way, even when we remove the debate about the existence of a deity) being challenged?
-
A First Time Grandma’s Prayer
Lord,
Thank you for my baby grandson, I love him so much, from the top of his head to his wiggly little toes.
Help me not to be too critical of the new child rearing methods, although I do have to say that three in a bed appears a little over-crowded! Demand feeding has a place, but 24/7 seems excessive!
Please assist me in being less cock-a-hoop when my pearls of wisdom are accessed, especially after the latest technique has miserably failed to bring up his wind!
I admit to enjoying retail therapy, the baby clothes are much cuter than when my children were infants. However, the piece of plastic in my purse is showing considerable signs of wear!
I want to be there for him as he grows, a grandmotherly refuge when fleeing from his parent’s opprobrium!
Please support me as his mentor so I can offer him wise counsel, an understanding heart and loving friendship. AMEN.
Rose-Mary
2002
Copyright Rose-Mary 2002
http://www.christianforums.com/threads/a-first-time-grandmas-prayer.12046/
Surnamed removed for privacy for floo.
It appears that double standards are something Floo has been showing.
I still believes being an atheist makes Floo feel as if she belongs somewhere.
Battys as she sometimes calls herself. I think in everything she seeks peace and a place of recognition. But attack is not a good option when no one is attacking you. :( :) However their is no copyright sign showing...
HTML Copyright Symbol Code (©)
-
A First Time Grandma’s Prayer
Lord,
Thank you for my baby grandson, I love him so much, from the top of his head to his wiggly little toes.
Help me not to be too critical of the new child rearing methods, although I do have to say that three in a bed appears a little over-crowded! Demand feeding has a place, but 24/7 seems excessive!
Please assist me in being less cock-a-hoop when my pearls of wisdom are accessed, especially after the latest technique has miserably failed to bring up his wind!
I admit to enjoying retail therapy, the baby clothes are much cuter than when my children were infants. However, the piece of plastic in my purse is showing considerable signs of wear!
I want to be there for him as he grows, a grandmotherly refuge when fleeing from his parent’s opprobrium!
Please support me as his mentor so I can offer him wise counsel, an understanding heart and loving friendship. AMEN.
Rose-Mary
2002
Copyright Rose-Mary 2002
Surnamed removed for privacy for floo.
It appears that double standards are something Floo has been showing.
I still believes being an atheist makes Floo feel as if she belongs somewhere.
Battys as she sometimes calls herself. I think in everything she seeks peace and a place of recognition. But attack is not a good option when no one is attacking you. :( :)
http://www.christianforums.com/threads/a-first-time-grandmas-prayer.12046/
Once posted on the internet or website then it can be reposted with the name of the writer. As long as credit is given to original writer. As I said name given but surname removed for floos privacy.
-
BA,
Why should she, or anybody, have to be the target of your ill-founded invective, day in and day out? do you never rest from it?
She isn't. What's being said is the her beliefs are nonsense, which is a qualitatively different matter.
-
You are a LIAR! I have just looked up the poem, 'Child of my child' I wrote in 2002 when my first grandchild was born, there is not one mention of the flipping deity in it!
You are the liar. It begins, "Lord."
-
BA,
You are the liar. It begins, "Lord."
Which "Lord"?
-
I knew all you've come back for was because you've missed the abuse, still it looks like you've made a good start, bootnose.
ippy
-
BA,
You are the liar. It begins, "Lord."
Which "Lord"?
Have you read it? It also ends, "amen," the usual ending of a prayer to the Lord; and was posted on Christian Forums! Stop trying to defend the indefensible.
-
I knew all you've come back for was because you've missed the abuse, still it looks like you've made a good start, bootnose.
ippy
Post again when you have something worthwhile to say - I'll keep checking over the next few months!
-
Sass give as good as she gets, I have no problem in challenging her nonsense!
So, you have no problem with your 'nonsense' (which it often is, by the way, even when we remove the debate about the existence of a deity) being challenged?
I have no problem when the fundies try to get me to see it their way. It is often quite amusing, especially when they make statements of fact for which they have not the slightest shred of evidence!
Anyone who posts on forums of this nature should expect to be vigorously challenged, if they don't like it they are not obliged to post here are they? Those who whinge and whine about it are pathetic, especially if their posts and more belligerent and nasty than those of most other posters.! One poster for whom I have respect, even if I don't see it his way in any shape or form, is Alan Burns. He gets a heck of a lot of stick from me and others for his stance on religion, but doesn't complain.
-
Sass give as good as she gets, I have no problem in challenging her nonsense!
So, you have no problem with your 'nonsense' (which it often is, by the way, even when we remove the debate about the existence of a deity) being challenged?
I have no problem when the fundies try to get me to see it their way. It is often quite amusing, especially when they make statements of fact for which they have not the slightest shred of evidence!
Anyone who posts on forums of this nature should expect to be vigorously challenged, if they don't like it they are not obliged to post here are they? Those who whinge and whine about it are pathetic, especially if their posts and more belligerent and nasty than those of most other posters.! One poster for whom I have respect, even if I don't see it his way in any shape or form, is Alan Burns. He gets a heck of a lot of stick from me and others for his stance on religion, but doesn't complain.
And that's precisely why you people give him stick, because there is no come-back . Cowardly and mean-spirited, as usual.
-
https://www.google.co.uk/#q=first+time+grandma%27s+prayer
I found the one Johnny is referring to.
It's on the Christian forums.
Sorry I still can't bring it up! If I did write such a poem I have no recollection of doing so and it is not stored in my archive like everything else I have ever written.
-
And that's precisely why you people give him stick, because there is no come-back.
You make it sound as though it would be different if there was.
-
And that's precisely why you people give him stick, because there is no come-back.
You make it sound as though it would be different if there was.
I'm simply saying it is the attitude of the bully and coward to repeatedly deride a person who cannot, or will not, respond in kind.
-
And it's the attitude of a whiny-arsed little bitch to keep on bleating about other people as though they're made of spun glass and their beliefs immune to challenge and critique.
-
And it's the attitude of a whiny-arsed little bitch to keep on bleating about other people as though they're made of spun glass and their beliefs immune to challenge and critique.
Why must you always speak in the language of the gutter? Don't tell me: because that's where you belong.
-
BA,
I'm simply saying it is the attitude of the bully and coward to repeatedly deride a person who cannot, or will not, respond in kind.
It probably would be if anyone actually did that. Fortunately for AB what actually happens instead is that his beliefs and the reasoning he uses to support them are criticised, but he personally isn't.
You really seem to be struggling with the difference for some reason.
-
BA,
I'm simply saying it is the attitude of the bully and coward to repeatedly deride a person who cannot, or will not, respond in kind.
It probably would be if anyone actually did that. Fortunately for AB what actually happens instead is that his beliefs and the reasoning he uses to support them are criticised, but he personally isn't.
You really seem to be struggling with the difference for some reason.
I think you've missed a few posts: there are pretty frequent references to his personal attitude and stance.
-
Let me guess: you're not going to be able to show us any of these posts.
-
Let me guess: you're not going to be able to show us any of these posts.
I'm not going to try, but it's a pretty fair bet you've contributed a few: you are hardly able to post without denigrating the person you are posting to.
-
BA,
I think you've missed a few posts: there are pretty frequent references to his personal attitude and stance.
For my part, I'm pretty sure my only replies to him have been of the "your reasoning is fallacious and this is why" type - and those I've seen from others have been anything but "bullying" too.
If you think otherwise no doubt you have some examples to share though.
Won't you?
-
BA,
I'm simply saying it is the attitude of the bully and coward to repeatedly deride a person who cannot, or will not, respond in kind.
It probably would be if anyone actually did that. Fortunately for AB what actually happens instead is that his beliefs and the reasoning he uses to support them are criticised, but he personally isn't.
You really seem to be struggling with the difference for some reason.
Exactly!
If there is a heaven AB will most likely be there, however I suspect the 'Christians' who bring the faith into disrepute with their nastiness may well end up in hell with us heathen. If that is the case I for one would take much pleasure in saying, "I told you so!" ;D
-
BA,
I think you've missed a few posts: there are pretty frequent references to his personal attitude and stance.
For my part, I'm pretty sure my only replies to him have been of the "your reasoning is fallacious and this is why" type - and those I've seen from others have been anything but "bullying" too.
If you think otherwise no doubt you have some examples to share though.
Won't you?
I don't intend to do the work for you. Have a read through some, and see for yourself. Try reading what's said about Sassy too.
-
BA,
I'm simply saying it is the attitude of the bully and coward to repeatedly deride a person who cannot, or will not, respond in kind.
It probably would be if anyone actually did that. Fortunately for AB what actually happens instead is that his beliefs and the reasoning he uses to support them are criticised, but he personally isn't.
You really seem to be struggling with the difference for some reason.
Exactly!
If there is a heaven AB will most likely be there, however I suspect the 'Christians' who bring the faith into disrepute with their nastiness may well end up in hell with us heathen. If that is the case I for one would take much pleasure in saying, "I told you so!" ;D
Perhaps you could say a prayer for them on the Christian Forums.
-
BA,
I don't intend to do the work for you. Have a read through some, and see for yourself. Try reading what's said about Sassy too.
It's not "for me" at all: you made the accusation, so it's up to you to support it with some evidence. As it seems that either you can't be arsed or that you realise that the charge is false, perhaps now you can turn your attention to grasping that criticising beliefs is not the same thing as criticising the people who hold them.
And once that's sunk in, perhaps you could turn your attention too to understanding the private beliefs are just that - private - but when those who hold them insist that they should also be privileged in the public square it's not only right but essential that those beliefs are challenged, however much offence it may cause.
-
BA,
I don't intend to do the work for you. Have a read through some, and see for yourself. Try reading what's said about Sassy too.
It's not "for me" at all: you made the accusation, so it's up to you to support it with some evidence. As it seems that either you can't be arsed or that you realise that the charge is false, perhaps now you can turn your attention to grasping that criticising beliefs is not the same thing as criticising the people who hold them.
And once that's sunk in, perhaps you could turn your attention too to understanding the private beliefs are just that - private - but when those who hold them insist that they should also be privileged in the public square it's not only right but essential that those beliefs are challenged, however much offence it may cause.
When will you people manage to do away with the foul language? You show yourselves up again and again. Have some decorum.
-
BA,
When will you people manage to do away with the foul language? You show yourselves up again and again. Have some decorum.
Avoidance noted.
-
BA,
When will you people manage to do away with the foul language? You show yourselves up again and again. Have some decorum.
Avoidance noted.
Pity you don't also note my comment, and do something about it!
-
https://www.google.co.uk/#q=first+time+grandma%27s+prayer
I found the one Johnny is referring to.
It's on the Christian forums.
Sorry I still can't bring it up! If I did write such a poem I have no recollection of doing so and it is not stored in my archive like everything else I have ever written.
Sassy has posted it for you Floo, along with the link.
There is no problem with you once thinking something, and then changing your mind.
It's all part of "working out things for yourself."
People do change what they believe over time, it's not a static process.
Where has Sass posted it?
-
And in a statement of fact Bashful is a hypocrite
And there we see precisely what I have been talking bout: you are only here to attack and criticise. Anything positive to say today? Thought not!
Your posts are Moebius strips of Irony, I can only doff my cap to a master of the reverse insult.
-
NS,
...Moebius strips of Irony
Beautifully put.
-
Bashful, if you're not looking for abuse, why are you here?
I couldn't help noticing you've had enough abuse and handed out plenty too while you're, hopefully on your short visit, will that be enough abuse for you it should last you at least another couple of months?
By the way isn't it about time you converted to atheism or secular humanism?
ippy
-
And it's the attitude of a whiny-arsed little bitch to keep on bleating about other people as though they're made of spun glass and their beliefs immune to challenge and critique.
Whereas you, what do you do?
STIR THINGS UP!
That's right a stirrer is usually far worse than the instigator.
Floo, wrote what she did as posted on the thread. She may not remember but she did. It is there for everyone to see. What is wrong, is that you show an inability to admit when someone is wrong and try and defend a wrong position and yet at the same time shout about the need to admit to being in the wrong. Double standards seem to be your bag. Go whine where someone takes you seriously, Your credibility is lost here.
-
Let me guess: you're not going to be able to show us any of these posts.
Are you going to claim you have never read them or they do not exist?
Could that be a deliberate act on your part?
Try this thread where her poem/prayer is posted and shows she used the Word LORD and said Amen.
Why make yourself look any more two-faced and insincere than you already have. Usually people are two faced but your attempts remind of a tower clock...faced all around.
Grow a pair and stop trying to make someone in the wrong out to be right. It doesn't work.
-
And it's the attitude of a whiny-arsed little bitch to keep on bleating about other people as though they're made of spun glass and their beliefs immune to challenge and critique.
Whereas you, what do you do?
STIR THINGS UP!
That's right a stirrer is usually far worse than the instigator.
Floo, wrote what she did as posted on the thread. She may not remember but she did. It is there for everyone to see. What is wrong, is that you show an inability to admit when someone is wrong and try and defend a wrong position and yet at the same time shout about the need to admit to being in the wrong. Double standards seem to be your bag. Go whine where someone takes you seriously, Your credibility is lost here.
I can't find it, where is it? If I did produce something like that in a moment of craziness, of course I will admit it and apologise!
-
I can't find it, where is it? If I did produce something like that in a moment of craziness, of course I will admit it and apologise!
Do a search on your name and grandmother's prayer - it appears
-
I can't find it, where is it? If I did produce something like that in a moment of craziness, of course I will admit it and apologise!
Do a search on your name and grandmother's prayer - it appears
My given name or a username?
-
Reposting this for Floo. Message 46 shows you the site and the poem/prayer and I have removed your name on this site.
A First Time Grandma’s Prayer
Lord,
Thank you for my baby grandson, I love him so much, from the top of his head to his wiggly little toes.
Help me not to be too critical of the new child rearing methods, although I do have to say that three in a bed appears a little over-crowded! Demand feeding has a place, but 24/7 seems excessive!
Please assist me in being less cock-a-hoop when my pearls of wisdom are accessed, especially after the latest technique has miserably failed to bring up his wind!
I admit to enjoying retail therapy, the baby clothes are much cuter than when my children were infants. However, the piece of plastic in my purse is showing considerable signs of wear!
I want to be there for him as he grows, a grandmotherly refuge when fleeing from his parent’s opprobrium!
Please support me as his mentor so I can offer him wise counsel, an understanding heart and loving friendship. AMEN.
Rose-Mary
2002
Copyright Rose-Mary 2002
http://www.christianforums.com/threads/a-first-time-grandmas-prayer.12046/
Surnamed removed for privacy for floo.
It appears that double standards are something Floo has been showing.
I still believes being an atheist makes Floo feel as if she belongs somewhere.
Battys as she sometimes calls herself. I think in everything she seeks peace and a place of recognition. But attack is not a good option when no one is attacking you. :( :) However their is no copyright sign showing...
HTML Copyright Symbol Code (©)
-
Bashful, if you're not looking for abuse, why are you here?
I couldn't help noticing you've had enough abuse and handed out plenty too while you're, hopefully on your short visit, will that be enough abuse for you it should last you at least another couple of months?
By the way isn't it about time you converted to atheism or secular humanism?
ippy
Why am I here? A more apposite question would be: "Why are you here?" You certainly have nothing original to offer. I come back after two months (I got full remission. ;)), and you are saying the exact same things you were before I left. Even you must be bored with you! :)
-
I have absolutely no recollection of writing that poem. But having read it I admit I must have done, and humbly apologise for not believing I had. :-[ However, it is obviously a 'spoof' prayer and meant as a joke, not because I was really asking any deity, for guidance having long since lost my faith. How very stupid of me to have put my name on it instead of initials, but in 2002 I was still rather naïve where the Internet was concerned. I learned the hard way!
-
Bashful, if you're not looking for abuse, why are you here?
I couldn't help noticing you've had enough abuse and handed out plenty too while you're, hopefully on your short visit, will that be enough abuse for you it should last you at least another couple of months?
By the way isn't it about time you converted to atheism or secular humanism?
ippy
Why am I here? A more apposite question would be: "Why are you here?" You certainly have nothing original to offer. I come back after two months (I got full remission. ;)), and you are saying the exact same things you were before I left. Even you must be bored with you! :)
You're still abusing people and wonder why you're getting so much of it in return, hasn't the penny dropped yet?
Oh and what does your manual say about casting stones?
ippy
-
I have just donated £50 to 'The Children's Society' in order to make reparation for disbelieving that I had written that 'prayer'.
-
BA,
Would these be the dulcet tones of the same Sassy you seem to think needs protection from abusive posts?:
Are you going to claim you have never read them or they do not exist?
Could that be a deliberate act on your part?
Try this thread where her poem/prayer is posted and shows she used the Word LORD and said Amen.
Why make yourself look any more two-faced and insincere than you already have. Usually people are two faced but your attempts remind of a tower clock...faced all around.
Grow a pair and stop trying to make someone in the wrong out to be right. It doesn't work.
How very (big C) Christian. The phrase "more sinning than sinned against" comes to mind wouldn't you say?
-
What I do find incredible is that what I have written on a forum many years ago, is remembered to this day. Should I be proud that my literary 'genius' is so memorable? ;D
-
BA,
Would these be the dulcet tones of the same Sassy you seem to think needs protection from abusive posts"
Are you going to claim you have never read them or they do not exist?
Could that be a deliberate act on your part?
Try this thread where her poem/prayer is posted and shows she used the Word LORD and said Amen.
Why make yourself look any more two-faced and insincere than you already have. Usually people are two faced but your attempts remind of a tower clock...faced all around.
Grow a pair and stop trying to make someone in the wrong out to be right. It doesn't work.
How very (big C) Christian. The phrase "more sinning than sinned against" comes to mind wouldn't you say?
Just for once she is hitting Floo with some of her own medicine. Notice you have nothing to say about Floo and her lying, and duplicitous behaviour. But that's what I would expect from someone with double standards, like you.
-
Oh stop the BS floo. I came across that faker prayer of yours because I was sick of your hypocrisy and decided read up on your Brother Doli Con. Your paranormal investigator and even your husband confirm you spout baloney. You didn't forget that prayer you wrote and you haven't donated any money to charity over being wrong and I being correct.
TOM RUFFLES BROTHER DOLI CASE, google it. Or the BBC and watch your video. You were a real media seeker till you started being suspected. Then miraculously, a message from Brother Doli from the beyond. He was leaving your home FOREVER. Booooooo
-
BA,
Just for once she is hitting Floo with some of her own medicine. Notice you have nothing to say about Floo and her lying, and duplicitous behaviour. But that's what I would expect from someone with double standards, like you.
First, "just for once"? Really? My experience of Sassy's posts is that she routinely uses bile and venom when addressing those who don't agree with her. As her efforts are the digital equivalent of green-inked ramblings though I tend to ignore the juvenilia they're laced with in any case.
Second, you may or may not agree with or like Floo's style but to my knowledge she never indulges in the routine abuse and insult that seem to be Sassy's stock in trade.
-
Yes she DOES Blue. She slams Sass every damned chance she has.
-
JC you have overstepped the mark this time that is for sure. :o I DID forget about that prayer and none of the stuff referring to our previous property was made up by us! Tom Ruffles never visited our home so was in no position to make a judgement.
As for donating £50 to the children's charity, I have just this minute received the e-mail confirming my donation!
Moderator: 3rd party personal communication removed.
-
Well, Sassy was banned at least once for absolutely atrocious and foul abuse of various pagans. This was a permanent ban, by the way, but of course, all bans were rescinded, which I think is OK. But I can't watch someone criticize criticisms of Sassy without remembering her behaviour. In fact, one pagan, can't remember her name, said that she was driven off the forum by Sassy's comments.
-
JC you have overstepped the mark this time that is for sure. :o I DID forget about that prayer and none of the stuff referring to our previous property was made up by us! Tom Ruffles never visited our home so was in no position to make a judgement.
As for donating £50 to the children's charity, I have just this minute received the e-mail confirming my donation!
Moderator: quote of 3rd party personal communication removed.
Conscience about all that lying?
-
Well, Sassy was banned at least once for absolutely atrocious and foul abuse of various pagans. This was a permanent ban, by the way, but of course, all bans were rescinded, which I think is OK. But I can't watch someone criticize criticisms of Sassy without remembering her behaviour. In fact, one pagan, can't remember her name, said that she was driven off the forum by Sassy's comments.
Interesting.
Wholly unsurprising, but interesting.
-
Well, Sassy was banned at least once for absolutely atrocious and foul abuse of various pagans. This was a permanent ban, by the way, but of course, all bans were rescinded, which I think is OK. But I can't watch someone criticize criticisms of Sassy without remembering her behaviour. In fact, one pagan, can't remember her name, said that she was driven off the forum by Sassy's comments.
In fact, Sass has a long history of abusing other people and their beliefs, if they should be so rash as to question her intellectual or spiritual superiority (I can remember her from probably considerably further back than you, wiggi). She knows God, you see (and is probably the only person who does). As such, she needs no molly-coddling.
It is quite amusing to see her attempt to write in French, though.
-
Oh, I haven't seen that :) What's it like?
-
Well, Sassy was banned at least once for absolutely atrocious and foul abuse of various pagans. This was a permanent ban, by the way, but of course, all bans were rescinded, which I think is OK. But I can't watch someone criticize criticisms of Sassy without remembering her behaviour. In fact, one pagan, can't remember her name, said that she was driven off the forum by Sassy's comments.
Interesting.
Wholly unsurprising, but int...
That comment coming from one of the most acerbic, vitriolic and sarcastic posters to be found - who has never been reprimanded on any forum...
-
That comment coming from one of the most acerbic, vitriolic and sarcastic posters to be found - who has never been reprimanded on any forum...
I admit (or as you put it, cocede [sic]) that I may sail close to the wind at times; perhaps I just know how to be acerbic, vitriolic and sarcastic and stay within the rules?
-
So why were you conning people on that Christian forum floo? And I have a problem with you saying you forgot about one of your copyrighted pieces. Well I hope that charity actually gets the money out of you. But as I am not Catholic, I don't believe your donation will wipe away your cons.
You claim that your amazing and sudden artistic talent is due to your brother Doli goings on. This claim you have also made public. You are an artist floo, and artist in more ways than one.
You made that statement about Sass spouting baloney, well, that was the trigger for me. You are no poor Floo here, what goes around comes around.
-
JC,
Yes she DOES Blue. She slams Sass every damned chance she has.
"Slams Sass" or "slams" Sassy's beliefs? The point is lost on BA, but they're not the same thing.
-
That comment coming from one of the most acerbic, vitriolic and sarcastic posters to be found - who has never been reprimanded on any forum...
I admit (or as you put it, cocede [sic]) that I may sail close to the wind at times; perhaps I just know how to be acerbic, vitriolic and sarcastic and stay within the rules?
You just happen to get away with it often, over the years, though not always of course, as you will freely admit, of course.
-
Any indication of what on earth you're supposed to be on about?
-
Any indication of what on earth you're supposed to be on about?
That's right, play it daft - easy for you. ;)
-
Well I related a story on the BBC site about the liberal government demanding the clergy not mention the name Jesus Christ at a memorial service for the passengers of a Swiss airliner that went into the ocean off Nova Scotia. I mentioned the fact that when Canadians found out about it, they were outraged at the liberal government for making this demand of our clergy. Shaker called me a liar, said I made that all up. Well, you know I found the article in the CBC archives, it was several years old, and posted the link for Shaker. Shaker being who he is, could not be adult about it and say a simple sorry. Nope, I just got an Shaker insult and he miraculously instantly forgot about the whole thing. Shaker, a real step up kinda guy. Too funny.
-
Well I related a story on the BBC site about the liberal government demanding the clergy not mention the name Jesus Christ at a memorial service for the passengers of a Swiss airliner that went into the ocean off Nova Scotia. I mentioned the fact that when Canadians found out about it, they were outraged at the liberal government for making this demand of our clergy. Shaker called me a liar, said I made that all up. Well, you know I found the article in the CBC archives, it was several years old, and posted the link for Shaker. Shaker being who he is, could not be adult about it and say a simple sorry. Nope, I just got an Shaker insult and he miraculously instantly forgot about the whole thing. Shaker, a real step up kind...
He won't admit to being in the wrong: he's not going to break the habit of a life-time.
-
BA,
He won't admit to being in the wrong: he's not going to break the habit of a life-time.
Naturally you'll be providing some evidence for your accusation of a "habit of a life-time" (sic).
Oh no, you're BA aren't you. No evidence needed then - sorry, my bad.
-
BA,
He won't admit to being in the wrong: he's not going to break the habit of a life-time.
Naturally you'll be providing some evidence for your accusation of a "habit of a life-time" (sic).
Oh no, you're BA aren't you. No evidence needed then - sorry, my bad.
Your bad what? Language, debating skill? ;D
-
BA,
Your bad what? Language, debating skill?
Further evasion noted.
-
BA,
Your bad what? Language, debating skill?
Further evasion noted.
You can put your template away now: it's only to clear that you can't think of anything relevant to post.
-
BA,
You can put your template away now: it's only to clear that you can't think of anything relevant to post.
Actually the questions I post are relevant - the problem is that you can't think of a relevant reply. That's why we're treated instead to your endless evasions, false accusations, logical fallacies etc.
-
BA,
Would these be the dulcet tones of the same Sassy you seem to think needs protection from abusive posts?:
Are you going to claim you have never read them or they do not exist?
Could that be a deliberate act on your part?
Try this thread where her poem/prayer is posted and shows she used the Word LORD and said Amen.
Why make yourself look any more two-faced and insincere than you already have. Usually people are two faced but your attempts remind of a tower clock...faced all around.
Grow a pair and stop trying to make someone in the wrong out to be right. It doesn't work.
How very (big C) Christian. The phrase "more sinning than sinned against" comes to mind wouldn't you say?
Since you are a silly Billy, and have not been posting long enough to know what is going on and yet bias enough to ignore the things Shaker had said.The person the post was addressed to. May be you should take the forest out of your eye to remove the specks from others....
-
BA,
Just for once she is hitting Floo with some of her own medicine. Notice you have nothing to say about Floo and her lying, and duplicitous behaviour. But that's what I would expect from someone with double standards, like you.
First, "just for once"? Really? My experience of Sassy's posts is that she routinely uses bile and venom when addressing those who don't agree with her. As her efforts are the digital equivalent of green-inked ramblings though I tend to ignore the juvenilia they're laced with in any case.
Second, you may or may not agree with or like Floo's style but to my knowledge she never indulges in the routine abuse and insult that seem to be Sassy's stock in trade.
You sound like Lucifers duck and I never spout bile and venom. I tell the truth and it annoys people. Just as I have told the truth about you. Lets look at your posting history....Between the 16th October 2013 to the 1st September 2015 you have made only 13 posts...
256
Christian Topic / Re: Objective morality is independent of opinion....or is it?
« on: September 01, 2015, 02:54:00 PM »
ReplyQuoteNotify
257
Literature, Music, Art & Entertainment / Re: Music was my first love...
« on: March 13, 2015, 01:30:01 PM »[/quote]
258
Literature, Music, Art & Entertainment / Re: Music was my first love...
« on: February 08, 2015, 03:44:44 PM »
259
General Discussion / Re: Forum Best Bits
« on: December 29, 2014, 12:09:34 PM »
From ht:
260
Moderation & Admin / Re: Karma Announcement
« on: December 19, 2014, 10:12:52 AM »
261
Literature, Music, Art & Entertainment / Re: Music was my first love...
« on: December 11, 2014, 11:49:48 AM »
ReplyQuoteNotifyRemove
262
Literature, Music, Art & Entertainment / Re: Music was my first love...
« on: November 10, 2014, 05:28:57 PM »
One for the catholics:
ReplyQuoteNotifyRemove
263
Literature, Music, Art & Entertainment / Re: Music was my first love...
« on: November 08, 2014, 06:21:28 PM »
264
Literature, Music, Art & Entertainment / Re: Music was my first love...
« on: August 11, 2014, 07:13:03 PM »
265
Literature, Music, Art & Entertainment / Re: Music was my first love...
« on: August 07, 2014, 07:36:20 PM »
266
Literature, Music, Art & Entertainment / Re: Music was my first love...
« on: August 07, 2014, 07:20:12 PM »
267
Literature, Music, Art & Entertainment / Re: Music was my first love...
« on: August 07, 2014, 07:08:58 PM »
268
General Discussion / Re: Introductions
« on: October 16, 2013, 05:05:55 PM »
Pages: [11]
Which means you really are not in a position to judge BA or myself. Have you no shame.
-
Well let's have some of these posts where I have supposed to have been vile. They don't exist. As for anything pagan I have never attacked posters. But if Christians have to put up with people spouting vile things about their beliefs who gets to choose that all others cannot be questioned.
Anyway show the posts instead of the accusations and prove anything said was not in reply to something far worse said as an insult to myself from other posters.