Religion and Ethics Forum
General Category => General Discussion => Topic started by: Walt Zingmatilder on October 11, 2015, 08:36:34 AM
-
..................and beneath them are the Philosophical materialists.
And beneath them are those who want themselves and others to be ignorant of their own philosophical naturalism because actually being collared having a world view would upset the self righteous cosy comfort of guffing from the dizzy heights of their own supposed ''common sense''.
-
..................and beneath them are the Philosophical materialists.
And beneath them are those who want themselves and others to be ignorant of their own philosophical naturalism because actually being collared having a world view would upset the self righteous cosy comfort of guffing from the dizzy heights of their own supposed ''common sense''.
So by saying beneath, do you mean underpins ?
-
..................and beneath them are the Philosophical materialists.
And beneath them are those who want themselves and others to be ignorant of their own philosophical naturalism because actually being collared having a world view would upset the self righteous cosy comfort of guffing from the dizzy heights of their own supposed ''common sense''.
So by saying beneath, do you mean underpins ?
No. I think I am trying to reflect philosophical value. How can a self satisfied supposed common sense underpin anything further than itself?
-
Please note that my screen reader says 'air-arky' ....
-
NURSE! He's out again!
-
Please note that my screen reader says 'air-arky' ....
Sounds more apt, actually. :)
-
..................and beneath them are the Philosophical materialists.
And beneath them are those who want themselves and others to be ignorant of their own philosophical naturalism because actually being collared having a world view would upset the self righteous cosy comfort of guffing from the dizzy heights of their own supposed ''common sense''.
So by saying beneath, do you mean underpins ?
No. I think I am trying to reflect philosophical value. How can a self satisfied supposed common sense underpin anything further than itself?
Philosophical value ? and who's the judge ?
-
No. I think I am trying to reflect philosophical value.
I'll have to take your word for that - I think you're failing.
How can a self satisfied supposed common sense underpin anything further than itself?
I've no idea, is that what you mistakenly think philosophical materialism/naturalism is?
O.