Religion and Ethics Forum

Religion and Ethics Discussion => Jewish Topic => Topic started by: Owlswing on November 17, 2016, 09:55:09 AM

Title: Once again W T F!!!!
Post by: Owlswing on November 17, 2016, 09:55:09 AM

An originAl stone tablet of the ten commandments Has been auctioneD in the U S for $850.000!

Everyone here knows my version to Christianity but this is, to my mind anyway, sacrilege and I now truly believe that Americans will seell their own mothers, grandmothers and children if it will make then a buck or two and that someone else will actually buy them.


https://uk.yahoo.com/news/ancient-ten-commandments-tablet-sold-auction-850-000-053412403.html
Title: Re: Once again W T F!!!!
Post by: Nearly Sane on November 17, 2016, 10:05:17 AM
Surely given it was the Living Torah museum that sold this, it's a Jewish topic?
Title: Re: Once again W T F!!!!
Post by: Walter on November 17, 2016, 10:15:37 AM
Surely given it was the Living Torah museum that sold this, it's a Jewish topic?
Jewish topic

isn't that a kosher chocolate bar?
Title: Re: Once again W T F!!!!
Post by: Alien on November 17, 2016, 10:19:50 AM
An originAl stone tablet of the ten commandments Has been auctioneD in the U S for $850.000!

Everyone here knows my version to Christianity but this is, to my mind anyway, sacrilege and I now truly believe that Americans will seell their own mothers, grandmothers and children if it will make then a buck or two and that someone else will actually buy them.


https://uk.yahoo.com/news/ancient-ten-commandments-tablet-sold-auction-850-000-053412403.html
Where does it claim it is an "original"?
Title: Re: Once again W T F!!!!
Post by: Anchorman on November 17, 2016, 10:43:11 AM
Erm......'Original'? You mean someone found the bits that Moses wrecked and used superglue? Wow!
Title: Re: Once again W T F!!!!
Post by: Owlswing on November 17, 2016, 10:50:24 AM

Where does it claim it is an "original"?


Mea culpa!

It states that it "It likely adorned the entrance of a synagogue that was destroyed by the Romans between A.D. 400 and 600, or by the Crusaders in the 11th century,".

I should probably - no, knowing the nit-pickers on here, I SHOULD have said "very early" or "ancient" - whatever appellation you apply to it there is, apparently, no version older! 
Title: Re: Once again W T F!!!!
Post by: Harrowby Hall on August 06, 2017, 06:55:48 PM
So, it wasn't found by that well-known American archeologist, Prof. Henry Jones Jnr. was it?