Religion and Ethics Forum
Religion and Ethics Discussion => Philosophy, in all its guises. => Topic started by: Nearly Sane on May 05, 2018, 09:48:12 AM
-
Interesting, quite long, article on Kuhn.
http://bostonreview.net/politics/errol-morris-there-such-thing-truth
-
And some more background on the case of Morris v Kuhn
https://lareviewofbooks.org/article/the-ashtray-has-landed-the-case-of-morris-v-kuhn/
-
Of course there is. Only a philosopher would be daft enough to doubt it.
-
Of course there is. Only a philosopher would be daft enough to doubt it.
I would agree.
-
I would agree.
The issue here is rather how do you determine truth. If you can't that there might be truth is effectively irrelevant for the how we progress. And I would suggest that it the idea that science is still part of a biased decision is what Kuhn argues. What do you see is just stating there is truth makes a difference to how you might determine what is truth?