Religion and Ethics Forum

General Category => Science and Technology => Topic started by: Nearly Sane on June 15, 2018, 10:59:02 AM

Title: More on anti vaccination
Post by: Nearly Sane on June 15, 2018, 10:59:02 AM
Apparently this has 'reignited' the anti vaccination 'debate'. I was npt aware that it had gone away, or that it is actually a proper debate.



https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-44483000
Title: Re: More on anti vaccination
Post by: Rhiannon on June 15, 2018, 11:20:12 AM
As the article makes clear, we live with the luxury of not growing up with our friends and siblings dying of preventable disease, not losing our children, not having our kids dealing with long term health issues as a result of childhood illness.

I’ll tell you why vaccination was a hard one for me, and it was; nothing to do with Wakefield, but just the fact of taking a well child and making them ill, even though it’s better for them in the long run. One of my kids was terribly unwell after her MMR; another had adverse reactions to her baby imms that made her leg swell up like a balloon (‘it’s probably the mercury’.) Against that though I always held the tragic death of my friend’s son from meningitis - this was before the current vaccines were available. There’s no point in trying to find the words for how that was but it’s the worst thing I’ve known.

If you love your kids you get them vaccinated. It’s that simple.
Title: Re: More on anti vaccination
Post by: Harrowby Hall on June 15, 2018, 02:06:59 PM


"Just because we have hesitancies and valid concerns about injecting our baby with specific chemicals and toxins does not mean we are anti anything," the post says.


No. judging by her photograph, she is quite prepared to have her own skin comprehensively injected with all kinds of chemicals ....
Title: Re: More on anti vaccination
Post by: Rhiannon on June 15, 2018, 06:31:53 PM

"Just because we have hesitancies and valid concerns about injecting our baby with specific chemicals and toxins does not mean we are anti anything," the post says.


No. judging by her photograph, she is quite prepared to have her own skin comprehensively injected with all kinds of chemicals ....

But she would argue that she’s made an informed choice as an adult. She’s not suggesting tattooing her baby.
Title: Re: More on anti vaccination
Post by: jeremyp on June 15, 2018, 06:38:04 PM
But she would argue that she’s made an informed choice as an adult. She’s not suggesting tattooing her baby.

Indeed she has. I wonder why she has chosen to ignore the people who are informed with respect to her child's vaccination.

Title: Re: More on anti vaccination
Post by: Rhiannon on June 15, 2018, 06:56:29 PM
Indeed she has. I wonder why she has chosen to ignore the people who are informed with respect to her child's vaccination.

Because it’s parenting, and for some (many?) people logic goes out the window thanks to a mix of hormones, utter terror and love like you wouldn’t believe. It goes counter to your instincts as a mother to make your baby suffer, which vaccination does in the short term, and it feels like you take a leap of faith in the professionals every time you let them vaccinate your child.
Title: Re: More on anti vaccination
Post by: jeremyp on June 15, 2018, 07:03:17 PM
Because it’s parenting, and for some (many?) people logic goes out the window thanks to a mix of hormones, utter terror and love like you wouldn’t believe. It goes counter to your instincts as a mother to make your baby suffer, which vaccination does in the short term, and it feels like you take a leap of faith in the professionals every time you let them vaccinate your child.

The only problem is that she isn't actually parenting yet and her partner who is not pregnant seems to be complicit.

It might be counter to your instincts but 90% of parents manage to override the instinct. You did, even though you saw adverse reactions in your children.
Title: Re: More on anti vaccination
Post by: Rhiannon on June 15, 2018, 07:36:07 PM
The only problem is that she isn't actually parenting yet and her partner who is not pregnant seems to be complicit.

It might be counter to your instincts but 90% of parents manage to override the instinct. You did, even though you saw adverse reactions in your children.

The first pregnancy is one of the worst times for nutcase paranoia. It gets better with second and subsequent pregnancies IME. Her partner may not be experiencing the hormones but he may well be no less terrified about getting it wrong, or it could just be that she's the one that has made the decision - she isn't going to put it all over Insta that he disagrees with her. He could just be biding his time. Who knows?
Title: Re: More on anti vaccination
Post by: Roses on March 27, 2019, 11:41:45 AM
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-47715169

There has been a bad outbreak of measles in New York state and all unvaccinated children have been banned from public places.

I am of the opinion that unless there is a valid medical reason why a child should not be vaccinated against diseases more often associated with childhood, it should be illegal not to do so.
Title: Re: More on anti vaccination
Post by: Robbie on March 27, 2019, 08:12:12 PM
I agree with you LR, had no probs with my children but when I read what Rhi said about friends of hers it's quite frightening. We had friends with little boy who was in an awful state after MMR, including horrible rash around his eyes, and such things are frightening. He recovered thank goodness.

Moderator: content removed.
Title: Re: More on anti vaccination
Post by: Nearly Sane on April 25, 2019, 08:45:32 AM
And the anti vax effect continues

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-48039524
Title: Re: More on anti vaccination
Post by: Roses on April 25, 2019, 08:56:55 AM
As I have stated previously, unless there is a proven medical reason for a child not to have the MMR vaccine, it should be illegal not to have your child vaccinated.
Title: Re: More on anti vaccination
Post by: Nearly Sane on April 26, 2019, 09:34:39 AM
This - NSFW


https://wwwl.youtube.com/watch?fbclid=IwAR2c9IUw0rJ1-oq9uRyYb-HcvHVwHJhnwFylkSKBRw3PPsevUS2FUv7TgVU&v=AAYw8Wy54O0&feature=share
Title: Re: More on anti vaccination
Post by: Stranger on April 26, 2019, 06:27:33 PM
This - NSFW

Since the link is broken, it's perfectly safe for anywhere...  :)

Try this: Vaccinate your kids, you bloody idiots - Mitch Benn on BBC Now Show (https://www.youtube.com/watch?fbclid=IwAR2c9IUw0rJ1-oq9uRyYb-HcvHVwHJhnwFylkSKBRw3PPsevUS2FUv7TgVU&v=AAYw8Wy54O0&feature=share)
Title: Re: More on anti vaccination
Post by: ad_orientem on May 12, 2019, 12:08:58 AM
As I have stated previously, unless there is a proven medical reason for a child not to have the MMR vaccine, it should be illegal not to have your child vaccinated.
I wouldn't go that far. It is a good thing to get vaccinated though.
Title: Re: More on anti vaccination
Post by: Roses on May 14, 2019, 12:16:51 PM
I wouldn't go that far. It is a good thing to get vaccinated though.

As measles can be a killer, I think there is a good reason to make the MMR vaccine a legal requirement.
Title: Re: More on anti vaccination
Post by: Aruntraveller on May 14, 2019, 07:21:26 PM
I wouldn't go that far. It is a good thing to get vaccinated though.

I would. If you don't maintain herd immunity, people die as LR said. To be taken in by charlatans is no excuse.
Title: Re: More on anti vaccination
Post by: Steve H on May 15, 2019, 08:13:48 AM
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-47715169

There has been a bad outbreak of measles in New York state and all unvaccinated children have been banned from public places.

I am of the opinion that unless there is a valid medical reason why a child should not be vaccinated against diseases more often associated with childhood, it should be illegal not to do so.
I am of the same opinion.
Title: Re: More on anti vaccination
Post by: Roses on May 15, 2019, 08:33:02 AM
Smallpox vaccine was compulsory for infants in my home island when I was a child.
Title: Re: More on anti vaccination
Post by: Steve H on May 15, 2019, 09:07:16 AM
Smallpox vaccine was compulsory for infants in my home island when I was a child.
And smallpox is now extinct. Pity we can't render anti-vaxers extinct.