Religion and Ethics Forum
General Category => Science and Technology => Topic started by: Nearly Sane on August 25, 2018, 09:52:47 PM
-
In a quick glance, this seems quite interesting.
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2018/aug/25/skim-reading-new-normal-maryanne-wolf
-
How can we not skim read ? There's so much information out there, if we read everything in depth we'd be dead within a month. Human brains evolved in simpler times.
-
How can we not skim read ? There's so much information out there, if we read everything in depth we'd be dead within a month. Human brains evolved in simpler times.
You don't have to read everything; just read properly what you do read.
-
You don't have to read everything; just read properly what you do read.
But then how do you choose what is worth reading, without skim reading, or similar ?
-
Author you're a fan of, subject you're interested in, the blurb...
-
But then how do you choose what is worth reading, without skim reading, or similar ?
I'll go with you on this one, I listen to jabber radio for most of the time and I sort of skim listen, there's loads I'm not hearing then I pick up on a word or two and then I'm all ears and listening closely, skim listening.
Regards ippy
-
Author you're a fan of, subject you're interested in, the blurb...
Then we are at risk of merely strengthening our private echo chamber.
Sometimes I think we were happier with less information. With fewer choices to make. Maybe Alan's freedom is really a burden.
-
Then we are at risk of merely strengthening our private echo chamber.
Sometimes I think we were happier with less information. With fewer choices to make. Maybe Alan's freedom is really a burden.
Not necessarily. I have read books precisely because I strongly disagreed with them before now, to find out more about the arguments (and I tried to be open-minded and prepared to change, or at least modify, my own views in the light of them).