Religion and Ethics Forum
General Category => Politics & Current Affairs => Topic started by: Nearly Sane on September 13, 2024, 11:21:09 AM
-
Small step but hard to disagree.
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cx2n2g5wze4o
-
The difficulty, I'd've thought, is defining junk food. It's easy with tobacco products - they either are or they aren't - but the dividing line between junk and non-junk food must be hazy.
-
The difficulty, I'd've thought, is defining junk food. It's easy with tobacco products - they either are or they aren't - but the dividing line between junk and non-junk food must be hazy.
I think an 80/20 rule works here. Any definition just has to be good enough and doesn't need to be absolutely logically consistent.
-
< Looks at the photo accompanying the article >
Mmmm. I think I'll go out for McDonalds now.
-
Having just spent a few days away in Bournemouth I have to say the number of times I had to stop myself saying "look at that fat bastard" was incredible. As a nation, we are ridiculously overweight. Any measure that might help address that problem has got to be worth trying.