Following a 3 year review of the condition of the Palace of Westminster, today should see a decision on what to do about the place. A full restoration could cost around £3 billion - up to double that if MPs decide to stay put during the work.
Several options have been put forward, which include staying put, upping sticks to Methodist Central Hall or the Queen Elizabeth Centre on South Bank; a wholesale shift to Birmingham, or a even a travelling Parliament.
Question 1: is £3b a sensible expenditure on this edifice?
Question 2: which of the alternatives listed above would you favour - or do you have an additional one?