Author Topic: World War I  (Read 1921 times)

Sriram

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8253
    • Spirituality & Science
World War I
« on: July 02, 2015, 08:19:39 AM »
Hi everyone,

Here is a BBC article about the largely forgotten Indian soldiers who fought for Britain in the World War I.

http://www.bbc.com/news/magazine-33317368

**********************************************************************************
Approximately 1.3 million Indian soldiers served in World War One, and over 74,000 of them lost their lives. But history has mostly forgotten these sacrifices, which were rewarded with broken promises of Indian independence from the British government

Exactly 100 years after the "guns of August" boomed across the European continent, the world has been extensively commemorating that seminal event.

The role and sacrifices of Australians, New Zealanders, Canadians and South Africans have been celebrated for some time in books and novels, and even rendered immortal on celluloid in award-winning films like Gallipoli and Breaker Morant. Of the 1.3 million Indian troops who served in the conflict, however, you hear very little.

As many as 74,187 Indian soldiers died during the war and a comparable number were wounded. Their stories, and their heroism, have long been omitted from popular histories of the war, or relegated to the footnotes.

India contributed a number of divisions and brigades to the European, Mediterranean, Mesopotamian, North African and East African theatres of war. In Europe, Indian soldiers were among the first victims who suffered the horrors of the trenches. They were killed in droves before the war was into its second year and bore the brunt of many a German offensive.

These men were undoubtedly heroes - pitchforked into battle in unfamiliar lands, in harsh and cold climatic conditions they were neither used to nor prepared for, fighting an enemy of whom they had no knowledge, risking their lives every day for little more than pride. Yet they were destined to remain largely unknown once the war was over: neglected by the British, for whom they fought, and ignored by their own country, from which they came.

Part of the reason is that they were not fighting for their own country. None of the soldiers was a conscript - soldiering was their profession. They served the very British Empire that was oppressing their own people back home.

The British raised men and money from India, as well as large supplies of food, cash and ammunition, collected both by British taxation of Indians and from the nominally autonomous princely states. In return, the British had insincerely promised to deliver progressive self-rule to India at the end of the war. Perhaps, had they kept that pledge, the sacrifices of India's First World War soldiers might have been seen in their homeland as a contribution to India's freedom.

But the British broke their word. Mahatma Gandhi, who returned to his homeland for good from South Africa in January 1915, supported the war, as he had supported the British in the Boer War.

India was wracked by high taxation to support the war and the high inflation accompanying it, while the disruption of trade caused by the conflict led to widespread economic losses - all this while the country was also reeling from a raging influenza epidemic that took many lives.

When the war ended in triumph for Britain, India was denied its promised reward. Instead of self-government, the British imposed the repressive Rowlatt Act, which vested the Viceroy's government with extraordinary powers to quell "sedition" against the Empire by silencing and censoring the press, detaining political activists without trial, and arresting without a warrant any individuals suspected of treason against the Empire. Public protests against this draconian legislation were quelled ruthlessly. The worst incident was the Jallianwallah Bagh massacre of April 1919, when Brigadier-General Reginald Dyer ordered his troops to fire without warning on 15,000 unarmed and non-violent men, women and children demonstrating peacefully in an enclosed garden in Amritsar, killing as many as 1,499 and wounding up to 1,137.

************************************************************************************

For information.

Cheers.

Sriram
« Last Edit: July 02, 2015, 08:29:12 AM by Sriram »

ekim

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5811
Re: World War I
« Reply #1 on: July 02, 2015, 10:59:56 AM »
Information noted.  Unfortunately that's the nature of imperialism and political and religious ideology.  In the end force is employed to try to maintain them and to destroy them.

ippy

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12679
Re: World War I
« Reply #2 on: July 02, 2015, 12:18:41 PM »
Hi everyone,

Here is a BBC article about the largely forgotten Indian soldiers who fought for Britain in the World War I.

http://www.bbc.com/news/magazine-33317368

**********************************************************************************
Approximately 1.3 million Indian soldiers served in World War One, and over 74,000 of them lost their lives. But history has mostly forgotten these sacrifices, which were rewarded with broken promises of Indian independence from the British government

Exactly 100 years after the "guns of August" boomed across the European continent, the world has been extensively commemorating that seminal event.

The role and sacrifices of Australians, New Zealanders, Canadians and South Africans have been celebrated for some time in books and novels, and even rendered immortal on celluloid in award-winning films like Gallipoli and Breaker Morant. Of the 1.3 million Indian troops who served in the conflict, however, you hear very little.

As many as 74,187 Indian soldiers died during the war and a comparable number were wounded. Their stories, and their heroism, have long been omitted from popular histories of the war, or relegated to the footnotes.

India contributed a number of divisions and brigades to the European, Mediterranean, Mesopotamian, North African and East African theatres of war. In Europe, Indian soldiers were among the first victims who suffered the horrors of the trenches. They were killed in droves before the war was into its second year and bore the brunt of many a German offensive.

These men were undoubtedly heroes - pitchforked into battle in unfamiliar lands, in harsh and cold climatic conditions they were neither used to nor prepared for, fighting an enemy of whom they had no knowledge, risking their lives every day for little more than pride. Yet they were destined to remain largely unknown once the war was over: neglected by the British, for whom they fought, and ignored by their own country, from which they came.

Part of the reason is that they were not fighting for their own country. None of the soldiers was a conscript - soldiering was their profession. They served the very British Empire that was oppressing their own people back home.

The British raised men and money from India, as well as large supplies of food, cash and ammunition, collected both by British taxation of Indians and from the nominally autonomous princely states. In return, the British had insincerely promised to deliver progressive self-rule to India at the end of the war. Perhaps, had they kept that pledge, the sacrifices of India's First World War soldiers might have been seen in their homeland as a contribution to India's freedom.

But the British broke their word. Mahatma Gandhi, who returned to his homeland for good from South Africa in January 1915, supported the war, as he had supported the British in the Boer War.

India was wracked by high taxation to support the war and the high inflation accompanying it, while the disruption of trade caused by the conflict led to widespread economic losses - all this while the country was also reeling from a raging influenza epidemic that took many lives.

When the war ended in triumph for Britain, India was denied its promised reward. Instead of self-government, the British imposed the repressive Rowlatt Act, which vested the Viceroy's government with extraordinary powers to quell "sedition" against the Empire by silencing and censoring the press, detaining political activists without trial, and arresting without a warrant any individuals suspected of treason against the Empire. Public protests against this draconian legislation were quelled ruthlessly. The worst incident was the Jallianwallah Bagh massacre of April 1919, when Brigadier-General Reginald Dyer ordered his troops to fire without warning on 15,000 unarmed and non-violent men, women and children demonstrating peacefully in an enclosed garden in Amritsar, killing as many as 1,499 and wounding up to 1,137.

************************************************************************************

For information.

Cheers.

Sriram

I saw that program, we, the Brits certainly took the mick out of the Indians and it made me wonder how, through what mechanism we applied enough pressure on them to make them join in with what essentially was our fight. 

ippy

Udayana

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5478
  • βε ηερε νοω
    • The Byrds - My Back Pages
Re: World War I
« Reply #3 on: July 02, 2015, 03:10:52 PM »
The British persuaded Gandhi to recruit an army for them - to show loyalty and in the expectation of better conditions for Indians - only to be foresaken after.
Ah, but I was so much older then ... I'm younger than that now

Sriram

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8253
    • Spirituality & Science
Re: World War I
« Reply #4 on: July 02, 2015, 04:40:23 PM »
The British persuaded Gandhi to recruit an army for them - to show loyalty and in the expectation of better conditions for Indians - only to be foresaken after.

Gandhi didn't recruit any army for the British...certainly not during WWI. He had just come to India from S Africa and was a nobody.

In WWII Gandhi supported the British and asked Indians to fight against Hitler.... and opposed people like SC Bose who wanted to build an army of freedom fighters to fight against the British..... even willing to take the support of Japan, Italy and Hitler. 

After WWII, Britain was a shadow of its former self and was happy to let India go.

Udayana

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5478
  • βε ηερε νοω
    • The Byrds - My Back Pages
Ah, but I was so much older then ... I'm younger than that now

Udayana

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5478
  • βε ηερε νοω
    • The Byrds - My Back Pages
Re: World War I
« Reply #6 on: July 02, 2015, 05:18:59 PM »
In WW2 Gandhi did not help the British in the war, but started the Quit India movement. Congress was against the Nazis but did not ask Indians to volunteer to fight (though many did). This is all well documented afaik.
Ah, but I was so much older then ... I'm younger than that now