http://www.pinknews.co.uk/2015/08/28/bus-driver-will-quit-rather-than-drive-citys-new-rainbow-bus/The subject of this article is obvious from the link, and appears to be just another anti-gay thing but, why are the following comments amde in the specific way they are:
1 - in the article it states that the driver is making his stand "because he is a 'Christian'."
Why the commas around the word Christian? Why is the article calling into question, apparently, the driver's religion or the genuineness of his claim to be a Christian?
2 - it states that the driver, "claims to be a Christian", but does not say why this claim is being called into question.
It states in the headline that "Bus driver will quit rather than drive the city[']s (Calgary, Alberta, Canada) new rainbow bus"; however this is not exactly true if what follows is. The driver states that he is worried that if he refuses to drive the bus he will be fired and the bus company, Calgary Transit, have (at the very end of the article), confirmed that "can’t just refuse to do their job because a bus has rainbows on it." Thus it would appear that the headline is in error.
Now, this article is published by Pink News so I feel that the wording of the article has been slewed to make the driver just plain anti-gay rather than a Christian standing by his beliefs.
Also, before my motives are called into question I should state that, in my view, if the driver is standing by his Christian views he should quit on the matter of the principle rather than making a thing of it in order to make the company fire him thus shifting the responsibility leaving his job from himself, but I also think the article, in the way it is presented, is not right.