Author Topic: The Decietful And Insidious EU.  (Read 10214 times)

Harrowby Hall

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5039
Re: The Decietful And Insidious EU.
« Reply #75 on: May 07, 2016, 04:35:36 PM »
It also seems to have been forgotten that the UK had already applied twice to join the EU. The first application, in 1961, was made by Harold Macmillan and the second, in 1967, by Harold Wilson.  Both applications were rejected as a consequence of Charles de Gaulle, with Adenauer's support on the first occasion, exercising a veto, The other members supported the UK's application. The UK was then instrumental in establishing EFTA.

It also should not be forgotten that Winston Churchill  firmly supported the idea of Britain playing a leading role in a United States of Europe. It is bizarre that many of the neanderthals braying for Brexit-regard him as a kind of Patron Saint of Conservatism.
Does Magna Carta mean nothing to you? Did she die in vain?

Jack Knave

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8690
Re: The Decietful And Insidious EU.
« Reply #76 on: May 07, 2016, 06:57:45 PM »
It also seems to have been forgotten that the UK had already applied twice to join the EU. The first application, in 1961, was made by Harold Macmillan and the second, in 1967, by Harold Wilson.  Both applications were rejected as a consequence of Charles de Gaulle, with Adenauer's support on the first occasion, exercising a veto, The other members supported the UK's application. The UK was then instrumental in establishing EFTA.

It also should not be forgotten that Winston Churchill  firmly supported the idea of Britain playing a leading role in a United States of Europe. It is bizarre that many of the neanderthals braying for Brexit-regard him as a kind of Patron Saint of Conservatism.
Was the term United States of Europe around in his time? Did he really understand what it meant, and Ever-Closer-Union, as we do now? I doubt it. These utopian projects always look good on paper but never pay out as they promised to do in theory. If he was around today he would be voting to leave because he would recognise the Son-of-the-USSR in all this, and he knew what a shithole that utopian project was.

Harrowby Hall

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5039
Re: The Decietful And Insidious EU.
« Reply #77 on: May 07, 2016, 07:41:44 PM »
Was the term United States of Europe around in his time? Did he really understand what it meant, and Ever-Closer-Union, as we do now? I doubt it. These utopian projects always look good on paper but never pay out as they promised to do in theory. If he was around today he would be voting to leave because he would recognise the Son-of-the-USSR in all this, and he knew what a shithole that utopian project was.

Right, JK.  You've coloured that page in. Why don't you now choose something challenging - like "Peppa Pig"?

Churchill was half-American. The United States of America is the most utopian project of all time.

Although you do have a point. The USA, where fifty small countries have merged their individual personalities into a single secular nation which then mentions god on its single-currency banknotes and has a haplass millionaire as its impotent figurehead ...

Does Magna Carta mean nothing to you? Did she die in vain?

Jack Knave

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8690
Re: The Decietful And Insidious EU.
« Reply #78 on: May 07, 2016, 07:58:29 PM »
Right, JK.  You've coloured that page in. Why don't you now choose something challenging - like "Peppa Pig"?
But they are nice colours and it looks pretty!

I prefer Saltee Sow.

Quote
Churchill was half-American. The United States of America is the most utopian project of all time.
Well, that explains many of his mess ups.

Quote
Although you do have a point. The USA, where fifty small countries have merged their individual personalities into a single secular nation which then mentions god on its single-currency banknotes and has a haplass millionaire as its impotent figurehead ...
Oh right! Insult me first then admit I have a point. On the face of it the US is, or looks, democratic and so looks reasonable but the USSR was obviously authoritarian and it is obvious that the EU is undemocratic and in some ways authoritarian in nature as well. Hence my comments.

Sassy

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11080
Re: The Decietful And Insidious EU.
« Reply #79 on: May 11, 2016, 05:28:35 AM »
Further to Sassy's posts 64 & 68 :

I must admit I've not met anyone who wants out of the EU.  We didn't actually vote to go in all those years ago.

Maybe always having lived and worked in London, people from other countries don't bother me at all.  I've not known people from overseas take ''our jobs'' or ''our houses'', they fill vacancies the same as anyone else and eventually buy their own house if they want to stay here, some are prepared to work doing things that most of us wouldn't.  Who wants to pick turnips at seven pounds an hour! Lots of Poles rent houses and multiply occupy while they earn some money.  We all blend a bit, not entirely of course, no-one wants to lose their culture.  It makes life interesting.  British people go abroad to live and work too.

How often each week do you leave your house and go into the cities in England and see the homeless on our streets?
How many homeless people last year turned away when seeking medical help from a hospital...( because they without due thought or care thought they wanted a bed for the night) died because of the medical negligence?
Lot's of Poles claim dole and asylum seekers and get homes and medical attention for free.
Truth is you rarely venture out anywhere and so do not see any reality of what happens to our own people on the streets.
What an hypocritical and denying middle class attitude. I suppose if you commit adultery it would mean that it isn't bad or wrong for others to do it, because if you have done it, then it has to be okay for them. As Christ said:- Let he who is without sin cast the first stone. So if you steal anyone who comes here and steals is ok. Just as  it is okay for our own people to be left to die on the street without medical attention or given a home for these polish, Russians, Romanians to come here and get it all.
Quote
Jakswan said: ''1950's Britain, scared of brown people, homophobic, illiberal, racist, no irish - no dogs signs and everyone attending church once a week.''

I was a child then but remember all that very well (apart from the church once a week, not everyone did that), some of it carried on into the '60s.  People were saying, for example, that West Indians were coming here, taking 'our' jobs and getting 'our' housing.  In fact the West Indians, who came from Commonwealth countries, were invited here as jobs could not be filled, eg on buses, British Rail etc.  They generally lived in private rented accommodation, multiply occupied, until such time as they could buy their own properties.  They were definitely treated badly - even in 'our' churches - and viewed with suspicion. ('Windrush' by Mike Philips is a book about West Indian migration to the UK. I would heartily recommend it.)

The WEST indians already here before the 60's.
Quote
19th century[edit]
Prominent African-Caribbean people in Britain during the 19th century include:

William Davidson (1781–1820), Cato Street Conspirator
Rev. George Cousens, a Jamaican who became minister of Cradley Heath Baptist Church in 1837
Mary Seacole (1805–1881), a nurse in the Crimean War.
Walter Tull, footballer and soldier,
Andrew Watson, footballer.
Robert Wedderburn (1762-1835/6?), Spencean revolutionary
Nathaniel Wells, landowner and yeomanry officer.
Early 20th century[edit]
The growing Caribbean presence in the British military led to approximately 15,000 migrants arriving in the north-west of England around the time of World War I to work in munitions factories.[16]

The Jamaican poet and communist activist, Claude McKay came to England following the First World War and became the first Black British journalist, writing for the Workers' Dreadnought.

Quote
Later on, late 1960s and early '70s, there were two waves of immigration from Kenya and Uganda, 'Asian' people, and there was outcry about them but they settled, worked hard, bought houses and are now assimilated.

It makes me feel ashamed that British people were so unwelcoming.

The same type of shame as on the Titanic when people from the upper class and your own left lower class women and children shut in the lower decks to drown because they were not of a class worth saving.
Let me see, if the first world war was...

July 28, 1914 – November 11, 1918 and the Titanic sank in 1912. Do you think your class has changed since then?

The truth is that people of your class caused the whole immigration farce in the first instance. People who stuck their heads in the sand and refused to see what was in front of them or the real reason why the people were worried about immigration.
First world war most of the WORKING CLASS were sent to the front even the young boys as canon fodder and not wanting to work in the muntion factories themselves and get blown up they allowed others to come here and risk their lives instead.
They allowed them to fight in the army and they allowed them to work in munitions factories

Working class people have always suffered at the hand of those like yourself, you believe it is alright for them to be used as
fodder. Working class women working in munition factories whilst the other classes kept their hands clean.


Do you see how you purposely remember the 60's but cannot be bothered about the real history.

So please if you want to be ashamed be ashamed of your deliberate ignorance of the reality and truth that you ignored.
It wasn't the working class people ashamed of those on the street or people coming in from those areas which need refuge from abroad. Those working class people were the ones who lived on the street and whom our country saw as the lowest of the low suitable to be canon fodder and munition workers at risk.

You should be ashamed of the class system which still does make those of lower class the problem rather than the class protection system. Without the working class we do not have Country. They don't want immigrants here to make the Country better. They want it, so they can run it as they choose and leave the poor back in the gutter. Families who are british from birth on the street without a home, food and clothes. No provision of safety or assistance once again taking responsibility from our Government to provide. The very first NHS hospital lost it's ER department and now they will close it completely leaving emergency treatment at least 15-20 minutes away even on blues and twos.

Go back to your cocoon... It appears ignorance is really bliss with you.




We know we have to work together to abolish war and terrorism to create a compassionate  world in which Justice and peace prevail. Love ;D   Einstein
 "Science without religion is lame, religion without science is blind."

Sassy

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11080
Re: The Decietful And Insidious EU.
« Reply #80 on: May 11, 2016, 05:35:35 AM »
You wrote:  " I never found one person who said they actually voted to go in." It is clear that you believed there was a referendum to join the EEC.

There never was a vote to "go in".

Even though you have produced extensive material which supports this fact, you don't seem to understand what it says.

Stop digging.

It was called the Common Market originally. Who were the 17.3 million who voted 'yes'. and the 8.4 million who voted 'no'.
As you can see the British did vote whether to remain in the Common Market now known as the EU.

Want help out of your hole?

http://www.vernoncoleman.com/howthebritishmedia.htm
Quote

Conned, tricked, lied to and spun into a world which bore no resemblance to reality, the British people voted to stay in the Common Market. A total of 17.3 million voted `yes' and 8.4 million voted `no'. The establishment, aided and abetted by the press, had turned suspicion and disapproval of the common market into a massive level of support.
Quote

It was the British press which helped lying, cheating, conniving politicians trick the electorate into accepting membership of the EEC.

How many people would have voted for the EEC if they had known the truth?


Vernon Coleman is the author of The Truth They Won't Tell You (And Don't Want You To Know) About The EU (published by Blue


Vernon Coleman 2006
We know we have to work together to abolish war and terrorism to create a compassionate  world in which Justice and peace prevail. Love ;D   Einstein
 "Science without religion is lame, religion without science is blind."

Harrowby Hall

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5039
Re: The Decietful And Insidious EU.
« Reply #81 on: May 11, 2016, 10:50:14 AM »
Quote
It was the British press which helped lying, cheating, conniving politicians trick the electorate into accepting membership of the EEC.

How many people would have voted for the EEC if they had known the truth?

Using Vernon Coleman isn't going to strengthen your case!

I repeat - there never was a vote to go in. There was a general election in which entry of the EEC was a manifesto commitment of the Conservative Party. The electorate elected a Conservative government thereby giving it a mandate to enable its manifesto. This is the appropriate constitutional authority and procedure in the United Kingdom.

The later referendum was an expensive political device used by Harold Wilson to bring the Labour Party into line. The upcoming referendum is essentially a device being used by weak prime minister to try to bring his party to heel, that it would result in continued membership of the EU was an assumption made by David Cameron when he dreamt up this charade.



Does Magna Carta mean nothing to you? Did she die in vain?

wigginhall

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17730
Re: The Decietful And Insidious EU.
« Reply #82 on: May 11, 2016, 11:52:14 AM »
Some of the towns which have taken in large numbers of immigrants have actually experienced economic mini-booms.   For example, Oldham has taken in quite a large number, and unemployment has fallen; same with Peterborough and Boston.   You also find small business increasing, and increased economic activity in general. There are problems, for example, with housing and health provision, but that is down to local and national government to rectify. 
They were the footprints of a gigantic hound!