Religion and Ethics Forum
Welcome,
Guest
. Please
login
or
register
.
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Forever
Login with username, password and session length
News:
E-mail address to contact Admin direct is admin@religionethics followed by .co.uk.
Home
Help
Search
Login
Register
Religion and Ethics Forum
»
Religion and Ethics Discussion
»
Philosophy, in all its guises.
»
Competence without comprehension
« previous
next »
Print
Pages: [
1
]
Go Down
Author
Topic: Competence without comprehension (Read 1026 times)
Nearly Sane
Administrator
Hero Member
Posts: 64322
Competence without comprehension
«
on:
June 30, 2017, 07:56:21 AM »
Review of Daniel Dennett's latest book. While I think some of criticisms are valid, I am bemused that someone citing Nagel approvingly on the difficulty in knowing what it is like to be a bat is quite so clear on what it is like to be a zebra and indeed all animals.
http://www.the-tls.co.uk/articles/public/competence-without-comprehension-dennett/
Logged
Nearly Sane
Administrator
Hero Member
Posts: 64322
Re: Competence without comprehension
«
Reply #1 on:
August 03, 2017, 01:13:17 PM »
Follow up on Papineau's review with correspondence between Sennett and Papineau
https://www.the-tls.co.uk/articles/public/dennett-papineau-debate/
Logged
Print
Pages: [
1
]
Go Up
« previous
next »
Religion and Ethics Forum
»
Religion and Ethics Discussion
»
Philosophy, in all its guises.
»
Competence without comprehension