Yep.
We've had confirmatory evidence of this from ostraca, found, not only in Syria and Palestine, but the Eas
tern Egyptian Delta.
About the only folk who dispute the date are Jehovah Witnesses, because the dates don't add up to their envisaged 1914 parousia if one accepts the factual record.
Hi Anchorman
I thought this date (587-586 B.C.) had been known to be historical fact for a long time. Not quite sure why the J.Ws insisted on 607 B.C. so stubbornly in face of all the evidence. Maybe it was a date touted as actual by certain supposed pundits at one time, and perhaps it fitted with their numerous earlier predictions of the
parousia with enough tinkering. The incorrect date does indeed make their assertion of
parousia in 1914 sound plausible to the uninformed (skip from Daniel to Revelations in one bound, calculate according to a
lunar year, add a year for the year 0 (should one do that in any historical calculation?) - and of course, start from a non-historical date. Absolutely marvellous!)
We also have historical confirmation in non-Judaic sources for certain other Biblical stories e.g. the siege of Jerusalem in the reign of Hezekiah (2Chronicles 32, 2Kings 18), confirmed by the prism of Sennacherib (approx 701 B.C.)