Disproofs of God.

[bluehillside Retd.]

Pidge,

I’m thinking Hillside you must uniquely for this board ad hominem and poison the well in this way. And since there is a lot of exemplar material on this forum......the very post I am quoting from for instance......it was perhaps predictable that you would project your manifold use of two fallacies back on to me when it was pointed out.

I just told you that more lying wouldn’t get you out of the hole you’ve dug for yourself. Why didn’t you take that advice?

So anyway, after that odd little detour into your latest failure of understanding when do you propose to demonstrate this supposed objective morality of yours, and to explain how anyone would identify such a thing even if it did exist? Or will this be yet another trigger for you to run away scattering even more lies, straw men and gratuitous insults behind you while you make good your escape?

[jeremyp]

I’m sorry Hillside, I’m afraid that starting off by suggesting somebody is incapable of anything more intelligent than a pigeon is irrelevant to any argument being made. What you are saying in effect is this person is stupid and on that we must judge the argument. Therefore ad hominem. The statement is irrelevant but pretends to relevance

Incorrect. It is an insult not an ad hominem.

[bluehillside Retd.]

jeremy,

Incorrect. It is an insult not an ad hominem.

Not even that actually - it concerns his dishonesty, not his stupidity.