How your brain invents morality

[Nearly Sane]

I'm not entirely sure about the neologism 'neurophilosopher' but there's a lot of interesting stuff in this interview with Patricia Churchland.


https://www.vox.com/future-perfect/2019/7/8/20681558/conscience-patricia-churchland-neuroscience-morality-empathy-philosophy

[Enki]

I found it interesting as well. I also found this about a week ago, which gives some further explanation as to where she's coming from with her ideas.

https://www.newscientist.com/article/mg22029450-200-the-benefits-of-realising-youre-just-a-brain/

Although I have reservations on her ideas about free will to some extent, what I liked about it was her attitude to the whole business of accepting that we are basically our brains, an attitude which I found most refreshing and quite re-assuring. If she is basically correct, and certainly science seems to point in that direction, then Alan's 'soul' idea becomes a non starter.

[Nearly Sane]

I found it interesting as well. I also found this about a week ago, which gives some further explanation as to where she's coming from with her ideas.

https://www.newscientist.com/article/mg22029450-200-the-benefits-of-realising-youre-just-a-brain/

Although I have reservations on her ideas about free will to some extent, what I liked about it was her attitude to the whole business of accepting that we are basically our brains, an attitude which I found most refreshing and quite re-assuring. If she is basically correct, and certainly science seems to point in that direction, then Alan's 'soul' idea becomes a non starter.

I think though that her approach is based on that assumption, and it's not something that can be shown as correct. The soul idea is as far as I can see non demonstrable, and non falsifiable.

I think that doesn't take away from the validity of  her approach as being revealing. And I am a little surprised she gets the push back she does. It doesn't seem to me to be scientism.