Author Topic: Supreme Court Decision on Discrimination against Gay and Transgender Employees  (Read 1027 times)

Outrider

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 14488
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-53055632

I can honestly say I didn't see this one going that way, particularly not Kavanaugh's stance.  A win for decency is a surprise, a 6-3 split is remarkable.  The potential fall-out from this is considerable, especially given that it falls back on legislation that's been on the books for some time.

O.
Universes are forever, not just for creation...

New Atheism - because, apparently, there's a use-by date on unanswered questions.

Eminent Pedant, Interpreter of Heretical Writings, Unwarranted Harvester of Trite Nomenclature, Church of Debatable Saints

Aruntraveller

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10911
Yes it is very heartening.
« Last Edit: June 16, 2020, 09:06:11 AM by Trentvoyager »
Before we work on Artificial Intelligence shouldn't we address the problem of natural stupidity.

Roses

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7962
Very good news indeed. :)
"At the going down of the sun and in the morning we will remember them."

Nearly Sane

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 63477
Yep, ir's excellent news. I posted the link on the trans rights thread last night.

ProfessorDavey

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17436
Yep, ir's excellent news. I posted the link on the trans rights thread last night.
Good news but rather shocking that in 2020 there could be any suggestion that someone could be discriminated in employment for being gay or transgender.

Roses

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7962
Good news but rather shocking that in 2020 there could be any suggestion that someone could be discriminated in employment for being gay or transgender.

I agree.
"At the going down of the sun and in the morning we will remember them."

Nearly Sane

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 63477
Good news but rather shocking that in 2020 there could be any suggestion that someone could be discriminated in employment for being gay or transgender.
Indeed, but as Outrider notes the 6-3 is a surprise and may mean that the attempts by the Republicans to pack the court have been way less successful than might have been thought.
What I've seen of the majority verdict by Gorsuch is very good.

Robbie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7512
Good news but rather shocking that in 2020 there could be any suggestion that someone could be discriminated in employment for being gay or transgender.

I agree.

So do I.
True Wit is Nature to Advantage drest,
          What oft was Thought, but ne’er so well Exprest

Nearly Sane

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 63477
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-53055632

I can honestly say I didn't see this one going that way, particularly not Kavanaugh's stance.  A win for decency is a surprise, a 6-3 split is remarkable.  The potential fall-out from this is considerable, especially given that it falls back on legislation that's been on the books for some time.

O.
Kavanaugh dissented. He's part of the three

Outrider

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 14488
Kavanaugh dissented. He's part of the three

Apologies, I meant Gorsuch, of course - probably an indication that I don't spend enough time differentiating between the more conservative justices!

O.
Universes are forever, not just for creation...

New Atheism - because, apparently, there's a use-by date on unanswered questions.

Eminent Pedant, Interpreter of Heretical Writings, Unwarranted Harvester of Trite Nomenclature, Church of Debatable Saints

Nearly Sane

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 63477
Apologies, I meant Gorsuch, of course - probably an indication that I don't spend enough time differentiating between the more conservative justices!

O.
I think Gorsuch would look on this as a individual civil liberties question. He leans more to that than the more corporate conservatism of the dissenters. There is a lot of moaning from some on the more right wing wing of the  gender critical that this redefines sex but it seems to me Gorsuch has made it clear that it precisely does not do that.


The Accountant, OBE, KC

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8952
I did not realise that people could be fired in the US for being gay. Good decision by SCOTUS. It just goes to show how laws/ text/ rules can lead to widely different interpretations depending on how someone interprets the legal text and the context the words apply to.
I identify as a Sword because I have abstract social constructs e.g. honour and patriotism. My preferred pronouns are "kill/ maim/ dismember"

Quite handy with weapons - available for hire to defeat money laundering crooks around the world.

“Forget safety. Live where you fear to live.” Rumi

Roses

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7962
"At the going down of the sun and in the morning we will remember them."

Robbie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7512
I did not realise that people could be fired in the US for being gay. Good decision by SCOTUS. It just goes to show how laws/ text/ rules can lead to widely different interpretations depending on how someone interprets the legal text and the context the words apply to.

I didn't know that too. I imagine there are places that won't hire someone they know is gay without giving that as a reason but not firing. I on't understand the reasoning, how is someone's sexuality impact their work ability.

Good result.
True Wit is Nature to Advantage drest,
          What oft was Thought, but ne’er so well Exprest

Outrider

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 14488
I didn't know that too. I imagine there are places that won't hire someone they know is gay without giving that as a reason but not firing. I on't understand the reasoning, how is someone's sexuality impact their work ability.

Good result.

This decision, as I understand it, would extend to recruitment, given that it's a work activity (from a pragmatic point of view, though, it's often difficult to establish why you weren't successful in a particular job application).

Unfortunately, this prohibition on discrimination doesn't extend to other areas of life, so it's still entirely possible to be turned down by landlords when seeking to rent accommodation, by adoption agencies, by private venues or sporting clubs...

O.
Universes are forever, not just for creation...

New Atheism - because, apparently, there's a use-by date on unanswered questions.

Eminent Pedant, Interpreter of Heretical Writings, Unwarranted Harvester of Trite Nomenclature, Church of Debatable Saints