Gay marriage is not a Christian topic but Satans deception is...

[Walt Zingmatilder]

But there are loads of things which are not well described, or were not historically.   You can't really argue that thunder was supernatural because it could not be described, and then was no longer supernatural, when it was.   Or the obvious example today is gravity, whose effects are being described, but not its  mechanism.

Ah, science of the gaps.....what cannot be explained by science....will be explained by, er, science.

[Shaker]

Ah, science of the gaps.....what cannot be explained by science....will be explained by, er, science.

Who says that, rather than stopping at the second sentence?

Faceless and nameless nobodies again eh, Vlad?

[wigginhall]

Ah, science of the gaps.....what cannot be explained by science....will be explained by, er, science.

This is one of your reversed arguments.    You were saying  that the supernatural is that which isn't described naturalistically, but of course, there are lots of things which are not.   I am not saying that they will be described by science at all, since some things may never be described.    But you were saying that they are therefore supernatural - no. 

[Shaker]

This is one of your reversed arguments.    You were saying  that the supernatural is that which isn't described naturalistically, but of course, there are lots of things which are not.   I am not saying that they will be described by science at all, since some things may never be described.    But you were saying that they are therefore supernatural - no.

Wiggy gets a peanut! 

Sorry Vlad 

[Gordon]

Moderator:

This thread is well off-topic and involves elements that are covered in other threads.

Therefore it has been locked.