From Post 49:
enki.... I don't have any evidence. If you read my original comment #28 I said who is to know if the impotence would have any connection to the sperm count. As Sriram says, more research needs to be done.
I did read your original comment.
You suggested that dominant mothers in some cases can 'castrate' their sons. By this, I assume that you mean, make them impotent, as you actually suggest this by referring to two men that you know.(in Post 30)
You do realise, I hope, that impotence and reduction in sperm counts are two different things.
Now we can all suggest all sorts of things without any evidence to support what we say. I could conjecture, for instance, that HIV/Aids is possibly God's punishment for misdemeanors perpetrated by certain human beings. Who is to know, I might surmise? I wouldn't have the slightest evidence for suggesting this, but I would have implanted that thought in the minds of others. I hope you would agree that such a statement is totally unevidenced, and that I would be very irresponsible for even suggesting such a thing.
So, I ask you, why bring up the idea that dominant mothers are a cause of reduced sperm count in at least some cases, unless you think that it is feasible even though you have agreed that you haven't any evidence at all to suggest that it is true? If you think it is feasible, then please give good reasons why you think that is so.
