Author Topic: Historians refuse to commemorate 'unruly' punk gig  (Read 222 times)

Nearly Sane

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 64369
Historians refuse to commemorate 'unruly' punk gig
« on: July 15, 2024, 06:29:02 PM »
Only commemorate the 'nice' history


https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cp38z28yjpvo

SteveH

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10414
  • God? She's black.
Re: Historians refuse to commemorate 'unruly' punk gig
« Reply #1 on: July 16, 2024, 10:12:57 AM »
I should think not either.
I once tried using "chicken" as a password, but was told it must contain a capital so I tried "chickenkiev"
On another occasion, I tried "beefstew", but was told it wasn't stroganoff.

jeremyp

  • Admin Support
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 32521
  • Blurb
    • Sincere Flattery: A blog about computing
Re: Historians refuse to commemorate 'unruly' punk gig
« Reply #2 on: July 16, 2024, 02:03:57 PM »
Only commemorate the 'nice' history


https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cp38z28yjpvo
I would be against it because it doesn't seem all that notable. A gig got out of hand. So what?
This post and all of JeremyP's posts words certified 100% divinely inspired* -- signed God.
*Platinum infallibility package, terms and conditions may apply

Nearly Sane

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 64369
Re: Historians refuse to commemorate 'unruly' punk gig
« Reply #3 on: July 16, 2024, 02:11:12 PM »
I would be against it because it doesn't seem all that notable. A gig got out of hand. So what?
Yes, I don't think it's a gig known outwith Bury