Vlad,
Purely philosophical as is your position and the fact that science always offers us reduced models. Please don't guff on about the virtues of science since there is always the danger with you guys that you extol values to it which are not actually derivable from science.
What “philosophy” do you think supports your conjecture about extra “stuff”?
Your enquiry itself is derived from the philosophy that there is only matter/energy and that particular philosophy is based on a circular argument.
Even the term ''secondary stuff'' seems based on that assumption.
Stop lying. The “philosophy” to which you refer is actually just the
working assumption that the material is all there is. If you want to pouffe into existence something else though, but all means come up with some philosophy of your own that would support it.
I notice that you demand evidence here....what about string theory and multiverse which you guys are prepared to except without evidence but which seems OK to you merely on the grounds that it is non divine?
Nope. String theory etc are
hypotheses that may or may not turn out to be correct pending further investigation. You on the other hand assert “God” as a
fact. Not only do you have nothing to support that assertion, but the definitional problems with the term “God” mean that – in scientific terms – it would be called not
even wrong.
