Once again AB totally ignores the actual argument put to him and goes for (ironically) mindless repetition instead.
You seem to be stuck in the restricted logic of physically controlled determinism defined entirely by past events.
I'm not. I've presented logic - nothing else.
In order to make sense of the reality we exist in, there has to be a means of escape from the inevitable, uncontrollable chains of physically pre defined cause and effect in order to be able to implement the conscious choices we make.
No there does not. Our conscious choices are entirely consistent with determinism.
We all have demonstrable, real time control of our conscious choices...
For (what seems like) the ten millionth time: yes, I know.
...which can only be derived from something which is non physical.
Nonsense - for all the reasons already given.
I'll repeat what I said (since you ignored it): You can't escape the fact that if all the things that can possibly contribute to something, do not fully define it, then there is nothing left but random variation.
That applies to who we are and to our choices - there is nothing in it that assumes the physical.
What you are proposing - a choice that is neither deterministic nor random - is a basic logical contradiction. If you are going to accuse me of assuming physical again, you need to say where and how making different assumptions can make some sense of this contradiction you keep proposing.