Vlunderer,
Isn't logic about premises though? That God fails logic has always seemed a con to me. Perhaps you can run that one past us again........unless it's one of those things that funnily you refuse to.........to be fair though that is more Hillsides bag.
Oh dear. As ever, you have it wrong here. It's not that "God fails logic" is the issue - rather it's that those who attempt to use logic to
demonstrate this god always seem to fall into false reasoning. Look at this mb for the endless stream of negative proof fallacies; arguments from consequences, popularity etc; misattribution of cause and so on - many of which you've attempted.
If you think that god isn't logic apt, then fine - finally propose some other method to demonstrate this god of yours so the rest of us can distinguish your conjecture from just guessing.
Oh, and the uncaused cause BS fails as you've been told many times for several reasons - you cannot show that the universe did have a beginning, "time" is meaningless before space time, it's special pleading for a god that would not have had to had cause, at best it leads to deism but not to theism etc etc.
Final thing: why on earth would you even bother with accusing me of not answering a question? Anyone on this mb and indeed on the old BBC one will be very aware that I've always answered questions and moreover by contrast that you've always run away from them.
Look, I'll show you: what method would you Vlad propose to distinguish your claims about "god" from just guessing about stuff?
'bye then...