AB,
I can use rationality, logic and critical thinking to arrive at the conclusion that God must exist, so they are not the work of the Devil. Not sure about scepticism.
You don’t understand the nature of logical fallacies. It’s not possible to make a bad argument into a good one because it happens to produce an outcome of which you approve – logic exists outside and independent of our opinions and preferences. In short, a bad argument is a bad argument is a bad argument. Whether it happens to be an attempt to demonstrate “God”, “Allah”, “Ra” or anything else doesn’t change that. The argument
itself has to be valid on its own terms if you want the outcome to be demonstrated.
And the problem here is that, while you may claim that you “can use rationality, logic and critical thinking to arrive at the conclusion that God must exist” your attempts to do so here always collapse into very bad arguments. While you may find that satisfactory, because they do exist outside of opinions the rest of us can very quickly identify them as invalid.
Now that’s not to say that you necessarily don’t have arguments that are sound, but it is to say that you’ve never managed to produce one here.
What’s inconsistent too by the way is that, when your mistakes are explained to you, you dismiss logic and reason as "just man-made”, then in the next breath you tell us (albeit falsely) that you can use logic and reason to support you. So which is it – “man-made” and you’re possessed in some mysterious way of a better method, or a legitimate means of arguing a point only so far at least you’ve never manage to harness it to validate your faith beliefs?
