SotS,
It may be a fact, it may not be a fact. What is missing is proof.
Actually what’s missing is a cogent argument. Proof is another matter. For now, AB is squarely in “not even wrong” territory.
According to you. Do not presume to think that everyone agrees with the foundation that is the basis for your arguments.
No, according to logic. These things have been worked out, codified and documented over the centuries. The
argumentum ad populum, the
post hoc ergo propter hoc, the god of the gaps etc fallacies are all standard models. When AB (or anyone else) attempts them they’re
necessarily making wrong arguments.
A euphemism for disagreement with what he has said. It also puts you in the embarrassing position of violating your own point 1:
1. Assert a faith belief as if it's a fact
Of course it doesn’t – see above.
A euphemism for he disagrees with the point made. Again, it puts you in the embarrassing position of violating your own point 1:
Wrong again – see above.
As per response to 3
See above.
You should be congratulating him on this.
Why when it’s dissembling as if there was still some value in the arguement when flat wrong is flat wrong? If he said, “OK I was flat wrong about that” you might have a point though.
A euphemism for he disagrees with your conclusion. Again, you are violating your own point 1. YOU are the one claiming your position as true by default, so it follows that anyone who disagrees with you is wrong, by default.
Wrong again – see above. When an argument aligns exactly with the construction of a logical fallacy then it’s a
wrong argument. There’s no wriggle room there.
Which you do time and time again.
Clearly not true as I don’t assert faith claims as if they are facts. Why pretend otherwise?
Indeed.
Every single charge here (and elsewhere) that you lay against Alan Burns (and elsewhere with e.g. Private FraZer) is something you do yourself! Bluehillside looks in the mirror and tries to claim that the reflection is not him, rofl
If you think so then why not try to find an example of it? OK, you’ve crashed and burned again here but just because you’ve always been wrong so far (and then refused to man up when your wrongness has been explained to you – see your “gullible” mistake for example ) doesn’t mean that you necessarily will be in future.
Good luck with it!