AB,
I cannot not accept that my arguments…
You don’t have any arguments. The term “argument” actually
means something, and your unqualified claims fail that definition. What you have is
assertions, and only that.
…are free of logic.
But you should, as you’d grasp if ever you bothered to engage with the (actual) arguments that falsify your assertions.
It would appear that only logic acceptable to you is based entirely on the limited human scientific discoveries made to date.
No it would not. Logic is logic – science is one manifestation of it, but there are others (philosophy for example). The only logic that’s “acceptable” to me is in fact
logic. When you abandon that (a magic soul etc) then you give me no reason whatever to think you’re right.
My logical analysis indicates that reality comprises far more than human scientific investigations will ever discover.
That may or may not be true, but it tells you nothing whatever about the legitimacy of asserting as facts supposed explanations that are profoundly illogical and so explain nothing at all.
Why is this so difficult for you?