Sriram,
What I am saying is that 'magic' is everywhere. Dark Matter is five times more abundant than normal matter but cannot be seen, felt or interacted with. The earth and solar system as a whole just float through dark matter as though it doesn't exist. That is science....but it is also 'magic'. If a religious person had proposed such a thing as dark matter, you people would have laughed yourselves silly.
If a religious person had proposed 11 dimensions or parallel universes you would have laughed it off. But it is science.
Emergence and complexity are similarly 'magical' because you can't explain it. If a religious person had used terms like 'emergence' or 'randomness' to explain most things he would have been criticized.
You are, as ever, confused. Science begins (as Richard Feynman famously said) with
guesses - essentially "here's everything we can think of that could be an explanation for an observed phenomenon". What it
then does though is to ask, "OK - which of these guesses are plausible given the known facts?" Those that survive this process are called
hypotheses, a hypothesis being a better supported potential explanation than just a guess.
Still with me? Good. What happens next is that the people who do science look for evidence that either confirms or disconfirms the competing hypotheses. And when sufficient confirmatory evidence can be found such that a hypothesis is validated it becomes a
theory - ie, it accords with the known facts, accurately predicts future events, could in principle be falsified etc.
The ideas you cite (dark matter etc) are at various of these stages, but are not yet scientific theories. Your various claims of fact about a supposed supernatural on the other hand are at the guesses stage, but nothing more. And your guesses about whatever you believe to be true are no more valid than anyone else's guesses about anything else.
And that old son is our Grand Canyon-sized problem.
