You are totally oblivious of the fact that there is an invisible energy surrounding us which is forming and shaping our lives.
In order for me to be oblivious to something, it would have to exist. I'm oblivious to the constant stream of neutrinos passing through my body because they have virtually no effect on the rest of the universe... however, they have just enough of an effect for us to be able to design experiments to confirm that they are there, even though in everyday life we have no indication of it. By contrast, I'm not aware of anything to give credence to your somewhat vague claim of an 'invisible energy surrounding which is forming and shaping our lives' - you could mean gravity, you could mean electro-magnetism and you'd be right, but I suspect you mean something less easily categorised or demonstrated.
Propaganda makes good use of it because via a bunch of untrue expression it guides many people down false paths...
Just for the record, in this discussion about religion and spirituality it wasn't me that first used the word 'propoganda'
![Smiley :)](http://www.religionethics.co.uk/Smileys/default/smiley.gif)
just by appealing to the false needs of manipulators...and just as the high priests manipulated the Jews to crucify Jesus.
Just as pretty much every social group in history has put out its message and run the risk of it being criticised as 'propoganda' - propoganda is just claims in support of a position, it's neither inherently good nor bad, it's the content of the message and whether or not it's based on reality that should be considered when you're judging it.
Well, it all has a science...
No, it doesn't all have a science. Science is not just a list of claims, nor is restricted to only facts - science is a process of investigation, and the sum of the findings of that process. Some of those findings are our best current understanding but we're fairly sure they're at best incomplete if not entirely wrong, some of them we're almost certain we currently think are probably right but will be undermined or at least modified in the future, and others are likely pretty much bang on track. What they aren't is popular (or unpopular) opinion, 'divine' revelation or historic tradition reinterpreted in the light of a modern understanding.
it is how our nervous strength reacts to the stimulus that, good or bad, is played into it...
If you're going to drop concepts like 'nervous strength' into the discussion which don't have a conventional meaning, you're going to have to give them a meaningful definition.
For instance...life tells us that we should scream and shout at pop concerts and also that we should waste our sex hormones as if nothing else matters but you would be wrong because via these tactics we are screwing up our health and leaving ourselves wide open to all the not yet understood ailments that our hospitals are full of...
Wow. That's a whole load of unsubstantiatedness dropped in one place... Life doesn't tell use we should scream and shout at pop concerts, that's a cultural trope - it's no different to the cultural trope that tells Muslims they should kneel towards Mecca when they pray or Americans that they should place their hand on their heart when their national anthem is played. I'm curious as to how 'sex hormones' (oestrogen? testosterone? progesterone?) are 'wasted', and I'm really curious to see any sort of medical record of someone hospitalised as a result of it.
Now, don't blame me for this,
Blaming people is rarely productive, blaming people for being wrong doubly so.
it is all contained within the science of righteousness
How can 'righteousness' have a science? How is it quantified? What's the unit of measure for righteousness? What does righteousness interact with to give us a meaningful way to calibrate anything?
and it is more relevant today than ever before.
Only to us, because we're here. Our cultural status is of absolutely no interest to Blackbeard, whilst 18th Century Nassua would have been quite significant to him and of only passing interest to us. That's what happens when you presume your subjective sense of something is a definitive indicator of some absolute truth...
O.