Vlad,
I think you need to demonstrate that God is an abstraction and stop trying to shift the burden of proof on that.
As so often before, you have the burden of proof arse-backwards here. I don’t need to demonstrate that the claim “god” is anything.
You were the one who gave us a bible quote as authoritative, so it’s
your burden of proof to explain why something being written in a particular book means it must also be true. Try to remember this.
I think we know that your definition of ''fact'' is based on naturalistic assumptions so you are arguing arse about face here i.e. God cannot be a fact so he must be an abstraction of the hopes, and wishes of Christians. Therefore Reification.
You don’t appear to know anything.
You were the one who reified a quote from a book into a fact with no reasoning at all to bridge the epistemic gap between them, not me. Try to remember this.
Goodness knows how many fallacies you've committed here.
I know: none. You on the other hand…
So each stage of a reification must be sound so for the final time of asking, Demonstrate God is an abstraction.
You’ve collapsed into incoherence again here, and why on earth would I need to demonstrate a straw man entirely of your making? Again:
you reified a claim in a book into a fact about the world – so it’s
your job to justify it.
Good luck with it.