My concept of freedom goes way beyond anything the laws of physics acting on the material elements of our brain can ever achieve.
That's because it's self-contradictory nonsense, and once again we can note that you ignored all the substantive points and just posted a trite, baseless assertion.
Your continued attempts to claim that the only problems with your notion of freedom are limitations imposed by the physical world are also dishonest, because you never address either the logic that undermines the claim or the logic that tells us that this sort of claim amounts to a claim of omniscience, let alone provide any actual reasoning to support it.
Your attempts to make your concept of freedom make sense are nothing short of comical, as is your claim to have 'thought deeply' about the subject or have 'sound logic'.
In my experience people who have thought deeply about a subject do not
run away from questions. They
like questions because it gives them more opportunity to explain their thought processes. If somebody says they don't understand a phrase they use, they'll be falling over themselves to explain it in a different way.
You are more like somebody who has learnt something by rote. All you seem to have is the script you use. You demonstrate no actual comprehension at all. Hence, when people question you about your absurd phrases and baseless assertions, all you can do is distract, ignore, and repeat.
Meaningless phrases that you
refuse to explain:
"Ever present state of conscious awareness".
"Concious control of our own thought processes"
Baseless assertions that you
never attempt to justify:
That your version of freedom is demonstrable.
That what people say is evidence of it.
Until you face up to these points, no thinking, rational person is going to take you seriously.
