Author Topic: Searching for GOD...  (Read 3853564 times)

bluehillside Retd.

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 19464
Re: Searching for GOD...
« Reply #51725 on: November 15, 2024, 10:50:37 AM »
Jeremy,

Quote
I think it's better to use the term "ideology". That covers religion and some aspects of politics...

Quite!
"Don't make me come down there."

God

Dicky Underpants

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4364
Re: Searching for GOD...
« Reply #51726 on: November 15, 2024, 11:01:49 AM »
I'm intrigued, what exactly is eternal oblivion?
Literally 'forgetfulness'. In the atheist view, there's nothing there to do the forgetting (see Outrider's witty riposte above). In the case of the believer, they have to forget rather a lot (see Revelation), including all their sufferings on earth. This raises the rather difficult philosophical point of what the devil constitutes a continuous real self, since previous earthly experience will be superseded. Only going on what yer Bible says.
« Last Edit: November 15, 2024, 11:15:37 AM by Dicky Underpants »
"Generally speaking, the errors in religion are dangerous; those in philosophy only ridiculous.”

Le Bon David

Nearly Sane

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 64260
Re: Searching for GOD...
« Reply #51727 on: November 15, 2024, 11:22:56 AM »
I think it's better to use the term "ideology". That covers religion and some aspects of politics.

Edit: Ninja'd by NS
I think it covers most, but not all of religion. Some religion, particularly aspects of Eastern religions, wouldn't really be ideologies. And if we expand religion to area of 'spirituality' which would be more in align with the idea of what politics covers then it's more nuanced.


bluehillside Retd.

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 19464
Re: Searching for GOD...
« Reply #51728 on: November 15, 2024, 11:34:54 AM »
NS,

Quote
I think it covers most, but not all of religion. Some religion, particularly aspects of Eastern religions, wouldn't really be ideologies. And if we expand religion to area of 'spirituality' which would be more in align with the idea of what politics covers then it's more nuanced.

You could also argue that some high profile politicians (Trump, Johnson etc) have no particular guiding ideologies and are just chancers and opportunists.   
"Don't make me come down there."

God

Nearly Sane

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 64260
Re: Searching for GOD...
« Reply #51729 on: November 15, 2024, 11:43:22 AM »
NS,

You could also argue that some high profile politicians (Trump, Johnson etc) have no particular guiding ideologies and are just chancers and opportunists.

Good point, and somehow that makes them more dangerous  I suppose they are populists. I am reminded of a quote from Ledru Rollin ' Je suis learning chef, il faut que je les suives' - I am their leader, it is necessary that I follow them'

I think the ideology there is from the bottom up, and is used by the grifter.

ETA - that's also true of some religions. Time to watch The Life of Brian
« Last Edit: November 15, 2024, 11:52:09 AM by Nearly Sane »

The Accountant, OBE, KC

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8983
Re: Searching for GOD...
« Reply #51730 on: November 15, 2024, 12:03:09 PM »
VG,

Of course you do. This from the first page of Labour’s 2024 election manifesto:

"Labour’s plan to kickstart growth will:

• Restore economic stability with tough new spending rules, allow businesses to plan, with a cap on corporation tax at 25%, and a new industrial strategy to give business long-term certainty for investment decisions.

• Unleash investment with a new National Wealth Fund to invest in the industries for the future, and Great British Energy to accelerate the transition to Clean Power. Our plan will create 650,000 jobs in the industries of the future.

• Reform our planning rules to build the railways, roads, labs and 1.5 million homes we need and develop a new 10-year infrastructure strategy.

• Reform decision-making to shift power away from Westminster to turbo-charge the efforts of mayors across the country, with new powers over transport, skills, housing and planning, and employment support, along with new growth plans for towns across the country.

• Reform our jobs market by getting people back into work with careers and job centre reform, a New Deal for Working people to make work pay, a new childcare offer to get people into work, and a plan to tackle our health and mental health challenges to get people back to work.

• Reform the immigration and skills system to ensure Britain is developing home-grown skills with workforce plans to meet the needs of industries and the economy.

• Introduce a modern industrial strategy, working in partnership with businesses and workers to grasp the opportunities of new technologies, with an AI sector plan, a new national data library to support cutting-edge research, 10-year budgets for key world innovation institutions, and planning reform to build the datacentres and infrastructure we need.
"

And here’s the Conservative equivalent:

- Cut tax for workers by taking another 2p off employee National Insurance so that we will have halved it from 12% at the beginning of this year to 6% by April 2027, a total tax cut of £1,350 for the average worker on £35,000 – and the next step in our
longterm ambition to end the double tax on work when financial conditions allow.

- Cut taxes to support the self-employed by abolishing the main rate of self-employed National Insurance entirely by the end of the Parliament.

- Cut tax for pensioners with the new Triple Lock Plus, guaranteeing that both the State Pension and the tax free allowance for pensioners always rise with the highest of inflation, earnings or 2.5% – so the new State Pension doesn’t get dragged into income tax.

- Give working parents 30 hours of free childcare a week from when their child is nine months old to when they start school, saving eligible families an average of £6,900 per year.

- End the unfairness in Child Benefit by moving to a household system, so families don’t start losing Child Benefit until their combined income reaches £120,000 – saving the average family which benefits £1,500.

- Cut the cost of net zero for consumers by taking a more pragmatic approach, guaranteeing no new green levies or charges while accelerating the rollout of renewables.

- Seize the benefits of Brexit by signing further trade deals, speeding up infrastructure and unblocking 100,000 homes, cutting red tape for business, and creating new fishing opportunities. To provide young people with a secure future

- Give young people the skills and opportunities they deserve by introducing mandatory National Service for all school leavers at 18, with the choice between a competitive placement in the military or civic service roles.

- Fund 100,000 high-quality apprenticeships for young people, paid for by curbing the number of poor-quality university degrees that leave young people worse off.

- Protect children by requiring schools to ban the use of mobile phones during the school day and ensuring parents can see what their children are being taught, especially on sensitive matters like sex education.

- Transform 16-19 education by introducing the Advanced British Standard, enabling young people to receive a broader education and removing the artificial divide between academic and technical learning. To safeguard our borders and national security

- Boost defence spending to our new NATO standard of 2.5% of GDP by 2030, so we can protect British interests at home and abroad in an increasingly hostile world.

- Introduce a legal cap on migration to guarantee that numbers will fall every year, so public services are protected while bringing in the skills our businesses and NHS needs.

- Stop the boats by removing illegal migrants to Rwanda.

- Work with other countries to rewrite asylum treaties to make them fit for the challenges we face. To strengthen our communities

- Increase NHS spending above inflation every year, recruiting 92,000 more nurses and 28,000 more doctors, driving up productivity in the NHS and moving care closer to people’s homes through Pharmacy First, new and modernised GP surgeries and more Community Diagnostic Centres.

- Protect female-only spaces and competitiveness in sport by making clear that sex means biological sex in the Equality Act.

- Deliver 1.6 million well-designed homes in the right places while protecting our countryside, permanently abolish Stamp Duty for homes up to £425,000 for first time buyers and introduce a new Help to Buy scheme.

- Recruit 8,000 more full-time, fully warranted police officers to ensure a new police officer for every neighbourhood.

- Cut anti-social behaviour in town centres by rolling out Hotspot Policing, expanding community payback and legislating to evict social tenants who repeatedly disrupt their neighbours.

- Invest £36 billion in local roads, rail and buses to drive regional growth, including £8.3 billion to fill potholes and resurface roads, funded by cancelling the second phase of HS2.

- Back drivers by stopping road pricing, reversing the London Mayor’s ULEZ expansion and applying local referendums to new 20mph zones and Low Traffic Neighbourhoods.

- Champion our rural communities by backing farmers with a legal target and additional investment for food security, and protecting our best agricultural land from solar farms.

- Continue to directly invest in communities across Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland, protect the UK’s internal market and the integrity of our United Kingdom.


Do you notice anything about them? Yes – they’re all measurable, and that measurability leads to accountability – if they don’t deliver on these targets they can be removed and dismissed. Now find me a religion or a cleric who commits to that kind of specificity and accountability rather than pronounce that god doesn't want you to eat shellfish or go to bed with your boyfriend and we can have a conversation. 
Most of your long list is fluff abut strategy that isn't measurable.

The only measurable bits for Labour possibly are:

"Cap on corporation tax at 25%"

Possibly "create 650,000 jobs in the industries of the future" but not sure what they mean by "industries of the future".

"Build 1.5 million homes" - but it doesn't say if they are affordable and fit for purpose

The Conservatives might have some more precise language but it's still meaningless without ethics.

E.g. if you reduce income tax to put more money in people's pockets and it leads to higher prices or lack of funds to spend on public services then it becomes an ethical issue of how much government involvement should there be in redistribution of wealth and access to public services.

How do you decide which families are eligible for 30 hours free childcare per week

Quote
Sitting behind politics’ engagement with the real world is often an ideology of some sort for sure, but the point here is that for the religious the ideology is all there is. There’s nothing to measure that would lead to accountability – that in part at least is why they often last so long.
Not surprisingly religion will last as long as politics because objective measurability is not the most important criteria for human interaction. A lot of the decisions in both religion and politics are fundamentally about ethics and fairness and based on subjective criteria and abstract ideas about collective vs individual, freedom vs restrictions, rights vs responsibilities, duty vs personal fulfilment.

The accountability in religion and politics is derived from votes for a political party leading to power and influence over people or the continued practice of a particular interpretation or school of thought of a religion leading to power and influence over people.   

Quote
If you can’t see a difference between the two or don’t think the difference is important then we’ll continue to disagree, but difference there is nonetheless and it’s an important one too in my view.   
What is the important difference between politics and religion? Just because you insert some ancient stories to illustrate ideas about morality or insert a god, how does that alter human nature or the desire to influence based on abstract ideas individuals have about  good and bad. Belief that what you are doing is good or right or that the ends justify the mean is still just your own personal belief based on your own interpretation of good or bad based on your human nature - even when you insert an extra layer of "this is what I believe god thinks is good or bad".

Sure there are some differences e.g. there is a mechanism in politics to vote people in and out of power. With religion, influencers, lobbyists etc there is no such formal mechanism.
I identify as a Sword because I have abstract social constructs e.g. honour and patriotism. My preferred pronouns are "kill/ maim/ dismember"

Quite handy with weapons - available for hire to defeat money laundering crooks around the world.

“Forget safety. Live where you fear to live.” Rumi

Walt Zingmatilder

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 33167
Re: Searching for GOD...
« Reply #51731 on: November 15, 2024, 12:31:31 PM »
I'm intrigued, what exactly is eternal oblivion?
That which people on this forum fear their life would be if they did not keep contributing to the Searching for God thread.

torridon

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10209
Re: Searching for GOD...
« Reply #51732 on: November 15, 2024, 12:43:38 PM »
 ;D  ;D

Sebastian Toe

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7717
Re: Searching for GOD...
« Reply #51733 on: November 15, 2024, 01:43:18 PM »
That which people on this forum fear their life would be if they did not keep contributing to the Searching for God thread.
It's a pity that you made it as far as the stage!

... and the actual answer from I'm assuming someone who might have a Christian insight?
"The word God is for me nothing more than the expression and product of human weaknesses, the Bible a collection of honourable, but still primitive legends.'
Albert Einstein

Outrider

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 14555
Re: Searching for GOD...
« Reply #51734 on: November 15, 2024, 03:02:04 PM »
Fixed it for you.

Not for me, it was a quotation, as I made clear. It was nice of you to highlight in red the bits where you fundamentally missed the point and thought that religion was just another sort of political ideology, it'll make it easier for people to find it later.

O.
Universes are forever, not just for creation...

New Atheism - because, apparently, there's a use-by date on unanswered questions.

Eminent Pedant, Interpreter of Heretical Writings, Unwarranted Harvester of Trite Nomenclature, Church of Debatable Saints

Alan Burns

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10210
  • I lay it down of my own free will. John 10:18
Re: Searching for GOD...
« Reply #51735 on: November 15, 2024, 04:10:09 PM »
I'm intrigued, what exactly is eternal oblivion?
It is what I assume non believers think is what happens when their mortal body dies.  Please correct me if I am wrong.
The truth will set you free  - John 8:32
Truth is not an abstraction, but a person - Edith Stein
Free will, though it makes evil possible, is also the only thing that makes possible any love or goodness or joy worth having. - CS Lewis
Joy is the Gigantic Secret of Christians - GK Chesterton

Dicky Underpants

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4364
Re: Searching for GOD...
« Reply #51736 on: November 15, 2024, 04:20:54 PM »
It is what I assume non believers think is what happens when their mortal body dies.  Please correct me if I am wrong.

It is also what happens to believers, since "the former things are passed away". Believers are supposed to forget everything too. Non-believers (if they are correct) can't 'forget' anything, since there would be no consciousness there to perform the act. Please reflect on Outrider's final paragraph in post #51719
"Generally speaking, the errors in religion are dangerous; those in philosophy only ridiculous.”

Le Bon David

Dicky Underpants

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4364
Re: Searching for GOD...
« Reply #51737 on: November 15, 2024, 04:37:50 PM »
NS,

You could also argue that some high profile politicians (Trump, Johnson etc) have no particular guiding ideologies and are just chancers and opportunists.

I agree that they have very many characteristics in common. I think that one thing that singles out Trump is that he has learned to stick to beating two drums again and again (perhaps his brain can't deal with more). I mean immigration and tariffs - these two concepts have always gone down well with a vast number of Americans who are otherwise uninterested in politics. And it appears to have worked. No doubt, though, that if he saw any other means of boasting his popularity, even the complete opposite*, he would choose that, if it gave him the chance to keep in power.

*Of course, we shouldn't forget Johnson's two pre-prepared contradictory Brexit speeches.
"Generally speaking, the errors in religion are dangerous; those in philosophy only ridiculous.”

Le Bon David

bluehillside Retd.

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 19464
Re: Searching for GOD...
« Reply #51738 on: November 15, 2024, 04:41:25 PM »
VG,

Quote
Most of your long list is fluff abut strategy that isn't measurable.

The only measurable bits for Labour possibly are:

"Cap on corporation tax at 25%"

Possibly "create 650,000 jobs in the industries of the future" but not sure what they mean by "industries of the future".

"Build 1.5 million homes" - but it doesn't say if they are affordable and fit for purpose

It’s not my list, it’s not “fluff” and they’re all measurable – either they verifiably happen or they don’t.

Quote
The Conservatives might have some more precise language but it's still meaningless without ethics.

E.g. if you reduce income tax to put more money in people's pockets and it leads to higher prices or lack of funds to spend on public services then it becomes an ethical issue of how much government involvement should there be in redistribution of wealth and access to public services.

How do you decide which families are eligible for 30 hours free childcare per week

Irrelevant. Whatever ethical considerations may sit behind the commitments to actions, they’re still commitments to actions nonetheless that can be checked as delivered or not delivered at the end of the term of office. What equivalent statements do you think the religious make? 

Quote
Not surprisingly religion will last as long as politics because objective measurability is not the most important criteria for human interaction. A lot of the decisions in both religion and politics are fundamentally about ethics and fairness and based on subjective criteria and abstract ideas about collective vs individual, freedom vs restrictions, rights vs responsibilities, duty vs personal fulfilment.

The accountability in religion and politics is derived from votes for a political party leading to power and influence over people or the continued practice of a particular interpretation or school of thought of a religion leading to power and influence over people.

No – politicians routinely get voted out and new policies and commitments to real world actions emerge all the time. You can’t say the same of clerics. QED   

Quote
What is the important difference between politics and religion? Just because you insert some ancient stories to illustrate ideas about morality or insert a god, how does that alter human nature or the desire to influence based on abstract ideas individuals have about  good and bad. Belief that what you are doing is good or right or that the ends justify the mean is still just your own personal belief based on your own interpretation of good or bad based on your human nature - even when you insert an extra layer of "this is what I believe god thinks is good or bad".

Sure there are some differences e.g. there is a mechanism in politics to vote people in and out of power. With religion, influencers, lobbyists etc there is no such formal mechanism.

As I said, the difference is measurability and its attendant accountability. Religions can have all the “ideas about morality” they like, but that’s the end of it. Politics on the other hand ties itself to actions – indeed you could often define "politics" as the enactment of ideologies – and those actions have real world effects and consequences that can be determined to have happened or not. You seem to think this difference isn't important. I think it is.
« Last Edit: November 15, 2024, 06:34:49 PM by bluehillside Retd. »
"Don't make me come down there."

God

Sebastian Toe

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7717
Re: Searching for GOD...
« Reply #51739 on: November 15, 2024, 06:12:07 PM »
It is what I assume non believers think is what happens when their mortal body dies.  Please correct me if I am wrong.
Well, I can't speak for other people.
As a non believer and especially an asoulist, when I die there's nothing left to have anything "aware" of the state of not existing which as someone said earlier it is the same as me not existing before I was conceived!
It would be the equivalent of throwing a stick on a fire.
Once it's gone, it's gone.
I personally don't have a problem with that and as such I live my life like it is the only one I will ever have.

However it would be interesting to know what you, as a soulist, believe will happen to the souls of those who don't make it to chummy up with the Big Guy?
"The word God is for me nothing more than the expression and product of human weaknesses, the Bible a collection of honourable, but still primitive legends.'
Albert Einstein

The Accountant, OBE, KC

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8983
Re: Searching for GOD...
« Reply #51740 on: November 16, 2024, 08:05:59 AM »
VG,

It’s not my list, it’s not “fluff” and they’re all measurable – either they verifiably happen or they don’t.

Irrelevant. Whatever ethical considerations may sit behind the commitments to actions, they’re still commitments to actions nonetheless that can be checked as delivered or not delivered at the end of the term of office. What equivalent statements do you think the religious make? 

No – politicians routinely get voted out and new policies and commitments to real world actions emerge all the time. You can’t say the same of clerics. QED   

As I said, the difference is measurability and its attendant accountability. Religions can have all the “ideas about morality” they like, but that’s the end of it. Politics on the other hand ties itself to actions – indeed you could often define "politics" as the enactment of ideologies – and those actions have real world effects and consequences that can be determined to have happened or not. You seem to think this difference isn't important. I think it is.
That's not the end of it because religions with ideas about morality also have real world effects. If they did not have real world effects why would you even be concerned about religion?

Outrider's comment was about the dangers of religion being used to advocate that something was true without evidence or despite evidence. My response was that the danger is from human ethics, regardless of whether the ethics are expressed in religious or political language. Therefore removing religion does not remove the human trait of abstract thought including tribalism that creates and has an impact on ethics that have real world effects.

When it comes to ethics (religious or political) that have real world effects, what important difference does it make to the dead/ injured/ survivors between a politician feeling justified in buying or supplying weapons to bomb and kill thousands of unarmed civilians, including thousands of children, and a religious person thinking the same?
I identify as a Sword because I have abstract social constructs e.g. honour and patriotism. My preferred pronouns are "kill/ maim/ dismember"

Quite handy with weapons - available for hire to defeat money laundering crooks around the world.

“Forget safety. Live where you fear to live.” Rumi

Nearly Sane

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 64260
Re: Searching for GOD...
« Reply #51741 on: November 16, 2024, 09:03:49 AM »
That's not the end of it because religions with ideas about morality also have real world effects. If they did not have real world effects why would you even be concerned about religion?

Outrider's comment was about the dangers of religion being used to advocate that something was true without evidence or despite evidence. My response was that the danger is from human ethics, regardless of whether the ethics are expressed in religious or political language. Therefore removing religion does not remove the human trait of abstract thought including tribalism that creates and has an impact on ethics that have real world effects.

When it comes to ethics (religious or political) that have real world effects, what important difference does it make to the dead/ injured/ survivors between a politician feeling justified in buying or supplying weapons to bomb and kill thousands of unarmed civilians, including thousands of children, and a religious person thinking the same?
I think that the split between politician/religious person doesn't quite work. Politicians are often religious and may be taking action for 'religious reasons', a religious figure could be taking actions for political reasons.


The 'Troubles' in Northern Ireland had political and religious reasons intertwined, as do many other conflicts, and wars. I'm baffled that some people think they can be separated out, or that they don't arise from the same basic traits of humanity.
« Last Edit: November 16, 2024, 09:13:37 AM by Nearly Sane »

bluehillside Retd.

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 19464
Re: Searching for GOD...
« Reply #51742 on: November 16, 2024, 12:23:48 PM »
VG,

Quote
That's not the end of it because religions with ideas about morality also have real world effects. If they did not have real world effects why would you even be concerned about religion?

Religions substantially concern themselves with what their various gods supposedly do and do not want the faithful to do. Whether these gods actually do want the faithful to do or not to do these things (and whether those gods even exist at all) is unknowable. There’s nothing to test or measure about that. Politics on the other hand says that you will live longer, be happier, be more secure, be more literate, be more whatever if various real world events happen or don’t happen (see the manifesto extracts I linked to for examples). These claims by contrast are testable and measurable.

Of course there’s an overlap between the two fields, but this substantial difference between them seems undeniable to me.           

Quote
Outrider's comment was about the dangers of religion being used to advocate that something was true without evidence or despite evidence. My response was that the danger is from human ethics, regardless of whether the ethics are expressed in religious or political language. Therefore removing religion does not remove the human trait of abstract thought including tribalism that creates and has an impact on ethics that have real world effects.

Abstract thought is fine so far as it goes, but there’s still a fundamental, qualitative difference between “you should do X because that’s my faith” and “you should do Y because the effects can be tested against a set of goals”. Politicians when they’re doing politics largely abjure the former; clerics when they’re evangelising largely rely on it.   

Quote
When it comes to ethics (religious or political) that have real world effects, what important difference does it make to the dead/ injured/ survivors between a politician feeling justified in buying or supplying weapons to bomb and kill thousands of unarmed civilians, including thousands of children, and a religious person thinking the same?

The important difference is that in politics demonstrably bad ideas can be found out and rejected, and better ones sought (think of the disastrous Truss mini budget for example that seemed great to the Tufton Street wonks who spawned it and to the Daily Mail, and then collapsed immediately it met reality). How would you propose to test the idea “God doesn’t want you to go to bed with your boyfriend” by comparison though?   
"Don't make me come down there."

God

jeremyp

  • Admin Support
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 32468
  • Blurb
    • Sincere Flattery: A blog about computing
Re: Searching for GOD...
« Reply #51743 on: November 16, 2024, 05:29:16 PM »
I think it covers most, but not all of religion. Some religion, particularly aspects of Eastern religions, wouldn't really be ideologies. And if we expand religion to area of 'spirituality' which would be more in align with the idea of what politics covers then it's more nuanced.

The dictionary on my computer says:

Quote
An ideology is a set of beliefs or philosophies attributed to a person or group of persons, especially those held for reasons that are not purely epistemic, in which "practical elements are as prominent as theoretical ones"

I think that covers all religions.
This post and all of JeremyP's posts words certified 100% divinely inspired* -- signed God.
*Platinum infallibility package, terms and conditions may apply

jeremyp

  • Admin Support
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 32468
  • Blurb
    • Sincere Flattery: A blog about computing
Re: Searching for GOD...
« Reply #51744 on: November 16, 2024, 05:32:38 PM »
NS,

You could also argue that some high profile politicians (Trump, Johnson etc) have no particular guiding ideologies and are just chancers and opportunists.

I would definitely argue that Tr*mp has no particular guiding ideology unless you count self enrichment. The same applies to Elon Musk IMO.

People talk about TR*mp being "far right" or a fascist" but he is neither of those things. He courts the people who are because they help him to gain power.
This post and all of JeremyP's posts words certified 100% divinely inspired* -- signed God.
*Platinum infallibility package, terms and conditions may apply

Alan Burns

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10210
  • I lay it down of my own free will. John 10:18
Re: Searching for GOD...
« Reply #51745 on: November 16, 2024, 11:16:04 PM »

The important difference is that in politics demonstrably bad ideas can be found out and rejected, and better ones sought (think of the disastrous Truss mini budget for example that seemed great to the Tufton Street wonks who spawned it and to the Daily Mail, and then collapsed immediately it met reality). How would you propose to test the idea “God doesn’t want you to go to bed with your boyfriend” by comparison though?
What consequences/benefits has promiscuity brought to our society?
STDs
the break up of family life.
the enormous cost of supporting one parent families and destitute children.
the mental breakdown of so many people who fail to live up to the so called norms of modern aspirations.

Would it not be so much better to simply follow our maker's instructions?
The truth will set you free  - John 8:32
Truth is not an abstraction, but a person - Edith Stein
Free will, though it makes evil possible, is also the only thing that makes possible any love or goodness or joy worth having. - CS Lewis
Joy is the Gigantic Secret of Christians - GK Chesterton

jeremyp

  • Admin Support
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 32468
  • Blurb
    • Sincere Flattery: A blog about computing
Re: Searching for GOD...
« Reply #51746 on: November 17, 2024, 12:55:49 PM »
What consequences/benefits has promiscuity brought to our society?
Are you claiming this is a recent phenomenon? Most of the things you list have always been with us.
Quote
STDs
In your world view, that was God. Nobody asked him to create syphilis.
Quote
the break up of family life.
Do you have any evidence that marriages break up more quickly now than in the past?

Quote
the enormous cost of supporting one parent families and destitute children.
That sounds more like an issue of poverty than promiscuity.
Quote
the mental breakdown of so many people who fail to live up to the so called norms of modern aspirations.
That's nothing to do with promiscuity.
Quote
Would it not be so much better to simply follow our maker's instructions?
I'll do that when you prove he exists and that the instructions you think he gave us are really his and not some ancient sex starved priest.
This post and all of JeremyP's posts words certified 100% divinely inspired* -- signed God.
*Platinum infallibility package, terms and conditions may apply

bluehillside Retd.

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 19464
Re: Searching for GOD...
« Reply #51747 on: November 17, 2024, 01:33:36 PM »
AB,

Quote
What consequences/benefits has promiscuity brought to our society?

I was thinking of a man wanting to sleep with his boyfriend, or for that matter an unmarried woman wanting to sleep with her boyfriend. How did you jump from that to promiscuity?

Quote
STDs
the break up of family life.
the enormous cost of supporting one parent families and destitute children.
the mental breakdown of so many people who fail to live up to the so called norms of modern aspirations.

All debatable to varying degrees, but irrelevant in any case.

Quote
Would it not be so much better to simply follow our maker's instructions?

It might be if ever you could muster a non-fallacious argument for this supposed “creator” existing at all, and for you having any idea what his instructions are once you’ve done that.

Good luck with that though. 
"Don't make me come down there."

God

Dicky Underpants

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4364
Re: Searching for GOD...
« Reply #51748 on: November 17, 2024, 05:31:02 PM »
What consequences/benefits has promiscuity brought to our society?

.....

Would it not be so much better to simply follow our maker's instructions?
Quite a step from opposing promiscuity to condemning all same-sex relationships.
"Our maker" has given an extremely variable set of instructions depending on where you dip into your holy 'book'. St Paul seems to have suggested it would be better to stay single. Jesus himself gave some very odd instructions, apart from the instance when he was forbidding divorce. He too seems to have suggested that celibacy was a higher state of spirituality, and even (taking him literally) advocated self-castration for males. You may argue that in the latter case he was obviously speaking metaphorically, but the great scholar Origen thought otherwise, and applied the knife. His example is not unique: the Russian sect of the Skoptzi were still insisting on self-castration well into the 20th century.
Trouble is, your God's 'instructions' are anything but clear, and it's about time you realised this.
"Generally speaking, the errors in religion are dangerous; those in philosophy only ridiculous.”

Le Bon David

The Accountant, OBE, KC

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8983
Re: Searching for GOD...
« Reply #51749 on: November 19, 2024, 06:06:59 PM »
Not for me, it was a quotation, as I made clear. It was nice of you to highlight in red the bits where you fundamentally missed the point and thought that religion was just another sort of political ideology, it'll make it easier for people to find it later.

O.
Ok I fixed it for Steven Weinberg. I didn't miss the point that the quote is nonsensical  and therefore could just as easily apply to politics.

Apart from the obvious point that there is no method to identify "good" or "bad" people (in religious or non-religious terms), Weinberg misses the point that religion does not claim to eradicate evil and religions acknowledge that religious people are just as capable of doing bad things as non-religious people. So why single out religion?
I identify as a Sword because I have abstract social constructs e.g. honour and patriotism. My preferred pronouns are "kill/ maim/ dismember"

Quite handy with weapons - available for hire to defeat money laundering crooks around the world.

“Forget safety. Live where you fear to live.” Rumi