Author Topic: Objective morality is independent of opinion....or is it?  (Read 106230 times)

Leonard James

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12443
Re: Objective morality is independent of opinion....or is it?
« Reply #25 on: June 03, 2015, 06:32:12 AM »
I think this topic is ripe for a formal two contributor debate. I don't want to accuse Al of obfuscation but the most pertinent points have been made on this topic by HT and its very easy for HT's awesome contributions to get drowned out.

All those in favour say aye! :)

If ht has the patience and energy to keep shooting Vlad's idiotic assertions down, it does more good than harm.

If not, I agree with you,

Alien

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 21794
  • Formerly known as "Black Dwarf"
Re: Objective morality is independent of opinion....or is it?
« Reply #26 on: June 03, 2015, 07:35:57 AM »
I think this topic is ripe for a formal two contributor debate. I don't want to accuse Al of obfuscation but the most pertinent points have been made on this topic by HT and its very easy for HT's awesome contributions to get drowned out.

All those in favour say aye! :)
Aye.
Apparently 99.9975% atheist because I believe in one out of 4000 believed in (an atheist on Facebook). Yes, check the maths as well.

Synonym

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2774
Re: Objective morality is independent of opinion....or is it?
« Reply #27 on: June 03, 2015, 08:21:40 AM »
Now that is out of the way,
   could anyone who believes that OM exists, explain what method there is for establishing that or any other moral value?

I would expect (or at least hope  :-\ ) to see a process which is independent of opinion.
To clarify, you understand that the claim is that a particular set of statements have the statement "Morality is objective" as their logical conclusion, and so subscribers to those statements should be prepared to subscribe to "Morality is objective" (else logically contradict themselves).

You already have the process to get from A to B which is independent of opinion. It's a purely logical one. You could then ask "so where does A come from" and A will also derive from a previous set of statements that have A as their logical conclusion. And so subscribers to them should subscribe to A.

So you have your process that is independent of opinion. That is, the process itself is. What won't be independent of opinion is the actual subscribing to the axioms that start it all. But then that is par for the course for anything, not just OM.
« Last Edit: June 03, 2015, 08:29:47 AM by Synonym »

Dryghtons Toe

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 570
Re: Objective morality is independent of opinion....or is it?
« Reply #28 on: June 03, 2015, 08:24:41 AM »

Quote
I think this topic is ripe for a formal two contributor debate. I don't want to accuse Al of obfuscation but the most pertinent points have been made on this topic by HT and its very easy for HT's awesome contributions to get drowned out.

All those in favour say aye!


If that happens I think it would need to be understood that Alan’s take on OM isn’t shared by all advocates of OM include some other OM theists.

As per HTs contribution, as I think Synonym pointed out quite well on the previous thread a number of HT’s oft repeated points were if anything particularly weak. He seemed to constantly equate the fact that having an opinion about something with something only being an opinion which is clearly not the case, and indeed does so again here on this thread:

Quote
Well, agreeing that an example of OM exists is still based on opinion, and so is self-refuting

Unless you made the basic error of thinking anything that is an opinion automatically made it ONLY an opinion then this statement just doesn’t make sense. It might make sense to say agreeing on an example of OM doesn’t in itself prove OM (which I agree it doesn’t) but it certainly isn’t self-refuting.

Regards

DT
« Last Edit: June 03, 2015, 08:29:37 AM by Dryghtons Toe »

jakswan

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12485
    • Preloved Ads
Re: Objective morality is independent of opinion....or is it?
« Reply #29 on: June 03, 2015, 08:27:07 AM »
I think this topic is ripe for a formal two contributor debate. I don't want to accuse Al of obfuscation but the most pertinent points have been made on this topic by HT and its very easy for HT's awesome contributions to get drowned out.

All those in favour say aye! :)

If ht has the patience and energy to keep shooting Vlad's idiotic assertions down, it does more good than harm.

If not, I agree with you,

Vlad wow no, Al is on record as conceding he could be wrong about torturing a child to death just for fun, but other than some flaky moral positions he's interlectually sound.

I can't recall Vlad making a coherent point let alone an coherent argument.
Doubt is not a pleasant condition, but certainty is absurd.
- Voltaire

Alien

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 21794
  • Formerly known as "Black Dwarf"
Re: Objective morality is independent of opinion....or is it?
« Reply #30 on: June 03, 2015, 08:35:08 AM »
I think this topic is ripe for a formal two contributor debate. I don't want to accuse Al of obfuscation but the most pertinent points have been made on this topic by HT and its very easy for HT's awesome contributions to get drowned out.

All those in favour say aye! :)

If ht has the patience and energy to keep shooting Vlad's idiotic assertions down, it does more good than harm.

If not, I agree with you,

Vlad wow no, Al is on record as conceding he could be wrong about torturing a child to death just for fun, but other than some flaky moral positions he's interlectually sound.

I can't recall Vlad making a coherent point let alone an coherent argument.
Could be? I would be.
Apparently 99.9975% atheist because I believe in one out of 4000 believed in (an atheist on Facebook). Yes, check the maths as well.

Spud

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7135
Re: Objective morality is independent of opinion....or is it?
« Reply #31 on: June 03, 2015, 08:47:47 AM »
You do know he's going to go for the 'god can't murder' drivel, don't you?
--------
Genesis 9:6
"Whoever sheds human blood, by humans shall their blood be shed; for in the image of God has God made mankind."
God makes a distinction between unjust and just killing here. Over to you to show that the flood was unjust.



jakswan

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12485
    • Preloved Ads
Re: Objective morality is independent of opinion....or is it?
« Reply #32 on: June 03, 2015, 08:52:00 AM »
I think this topic is ripe for a formal two contributor debate. I don't want to accuse Al of obfuscation but the most pertinent points have been made on this topic by HT and its very easy for HT's awesome contributions to get drowned out.

All those in favour say aye! :)

If ht has the patience and energy to keep shooting Vlad's idiotic assertions down, it does more good than harm.

If not, I agree with you,

Vlad wow no, Al is on record as conceding he could be wrong about torturing a child to death just for fun, but other than some flaky moral positions he's interlectually sound.

I can't recall Vlad making a coherent point let alone an coherent argument.
Could be? I would be.

TACTDJFF = (a) morally wrong
TACTDJFF =(b) morally good

Your position is (a) but you could be wrong, since its independent of your opinion. Like the speed of light, if there is a pencil on my desk, unlike love or beauty which you can't be wrong about since they are entirely dependant on opinion.

Unless you provide a method to prove (a) independent of opinion of course, which we are all looking forward to.
« Last Edit: June 03, 2015, 09:49:33 AM by jakswan »
Doubt is not a pleasant condition, but certainty is absurd.
- Voltaire

jakswan

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12485
    • Preloved Ads
Re: Objective morality is independent of opinion....or is it?
« Reply #33 on: June 03, 2015, 08:54:19 AM »
You do know he's going to go for the 'god can't murder' drivel, don't you?
--------
Genesis 9:6
"Whoever sheds human blood, by humans shall their blood be shed; for in the image of God has God made mankind."
God makes a distinction between unjust and just killing here. Over to you to show that the flood was unjust.

Sorry you want it explained to you how the killing of children is unjust?
Doubt is not a pleasant condition, but certainty is absurd.
- Voltaire

Dryghtons Toe

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 570
Re: Objective morality is independent of opinion....or is it?
« Reply #34 on: June 03, 2015, 09:34:29 AM »


Quote
Unless you provide a method to prove (a) independent of opinion of course, which we are all looking forward to.

I don’t think anyone with OM thinks they can prove it as far as I know. The metaphysical status of morality is like all metaphysical questions something that can’t be definitively proved in any sense equivalent to scientific proof, that’s why the area is called metaphysics rather than physic although there might be logical proofs of some metaphysical questions in so far as we agree on the premises.

With all metaphysical questions we can draw out what is logically entailed by each position and make a case for viewing the issue in this way rather than another as well as clearing up any conceptual confusion which can often be involved. The argument between moral realism and anti-realism has always been of this form and it’s a confusion on your part if you think it can be approached differently.

Regards

DT

Alien

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 21794
  • Formerly known as "Black Dwarf"
Re: Objective morality is independent of opinion....or is it?
« Reply #35 on: June 03, 2015, 09:46:49 AM »
I think this topic is ripe for a formal two contributor debate. I don't want to accuse Al of obfuscation but the most pertinent points have been made on this topic by HT and its very easy for HT's awesome contributions to get drowned out.

All those in favour say aye! :)

If ht has the patience and energy to keep shooting Vlad's idiotic assertions down, it does more good than harm.

If not, I agree with you,

Vlad wow no, Al is on record as conceding he could be wrong about torturing a child to death just for fun, but other than some flaky moral positions he's interlectually sound.

I can't recall Vlad making a coherent point let alone an coherent argument.
Could be? I would be.

TACTDJFF = (a) morally wrong
TACTFJFF =(b) morally good

Your position is (a) but you could be wrong, since its independent of your opinion. Like the speed of light, if there is a pencil on my desk, unlike love or beauty which you can't be wrong about since they are entirely dependant on opinion.

Unless you provide a method to prove (a) independent of opinion of course, which we are all looking forward to.
What's TACTFJFF ?
Apparently 99.9975% atheist because I believe in one out of 4000 believed in (an atheist on Facebook). Yes, check the maths as well.

jakswan

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12485
    • Preloved Ads
Re: Objective morality is independent of opinion....or is it?
« Reply #36 on: June 03, 2015, 09:49:11 AM »
I don’t think anyone with OM thinks they can prove it as far as I know. The metaphysical status of morality is like all metaphysical questions something that can’t be definitively proved in any sense equivalent to scientific proof, that’s why the area is called metaphysics rather than physic although there might be logical proofs of some metaphysical questions in so far as we agree on the premises.

I think Al's view of morality is different to yours.

Quote
With all metaphysical questions we can draw out what is logically entailed by each position and make a case for viewing the issue in this way rather than another as well as clearing up any conceptual confusion which can often be involved. The argument between moral realism and anti-realism has always been of this form and it’s a confusion on your part if you think it can be approached differently.

I don't think objective moral values is a metaphysical question whereas objective morality might be. 
Doubt is not a pleasant condition, but certainty is absurd.
- Voltaire

horsethorn

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12131
  • Anomalographer
    • "We are star stuff. We are the universe made manifest trying to figure itself out." (Delenn, Babylon 5)
Re: Objective morality is independent of opinion....or is it?
« Reply #37 on: June 03, 2015, 09:49:18 AM »
I think this topic is ripe for a formal two contributor debate. I don't want to accuse Al of obfuscation but the most pertinent points have been made on this topic by HT and its very easy for HT's awesome contributions to get drowned out.

All those in favour say aye! :)

I'm flattered, but I don't think there's much point. Al and I had quite a lot of debate on the original threads. The sticking point was the idea that having an opinion that something was objectively moral, for me, was not evidence of OM existing. Al seemed to disagree.

ht
Darth Horsethorn, Most Patient Saint®, Senior Wrangler®, Knight Inerrant® and Gonnagle of the Reformed Church of the Debatable Saints®
Steampunk Panentheist
Not an atheist
"We are star stuff. We are the universe made manifest trying to figure itself out." (Delenn, Babylon 5)

jakswan

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12485
    • Preloved Ads
Re: Objective morality is independent of opinion....or is it?
« Reply #38 on: June 03, 2015, 09:50:08 AM »
Doubt is not a pleasant condition, but certainty is absurd.
- Voltaire

Alien

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 21794
  • Formerly known as "Black Dwarf"
Re: Objective morality is independent of opinion....or is it?
« Reply #39 on: June 03, 2015, 09:59:52 AM »
...

I don't think objective moral values is a metaphysical question whereas objective morality might be.
That would be interesting - objective morality which does not include moral values.
Apparently 99.9975% atheist because I believe in one out of 4000 believed in (an atheist on Facebook). Yes, check the maths as well.

Alien

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 21794
  • Formerly known as "Black Dwarf"
Re: Objective morality is independent of opinion....or is it?
« Reply #40 on: June 03, 2015, 10:01:46 AM »
I think this topic is ripe for a formal two contributor debate. I don't want to accuse Al of obfuscation but the most pertinent points have been made on this topic by HT and its very easy for HT's awesome contributions to get drowned out.

All those in favour say aye! :)

If ht has the patience and energy to keep shooting Vlad's idiotic assertions down, it does more good than harm.

If not, I agree with you,

Vlad wow no, Al is on record as conceding he could be wrong about torturing a child to death just for fun, but other than some flaky moral positions he's interlectually sound.

I can't recall Vlad making a coherent point let alone an coherent argument.
Could be? I would be.

TACTDJFF = (a) morally wrong
TACTDJFF =(b) morally good

Your position is (a) but you could be wrong, since its independent of your opinion. Like the speed of light, if there is a pencil on my desk, unlike love or beauty which you can't be wrong about since they are entirely dependant on opinion.

Unless you provide a method to prove (a) independent of opinion of course, which we are all looking forward to.
"Your position is (a) but you could be wrong, since its independent of your opinion." No. I could be wrong, because I am fallible. I don't think I am in this case though.
« Last Edit: June 03, 2015, 10:30:45 AM by Alien »
Apparently 99.9975% atheist because I believe in one out of 4000 believed in (an atheist on Facebook). Yes, check the maths as well.

Dryghtons Toe

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 570
Re: Objective morality is independent of opinion....or is it?
« Reply #41 on: June 03, 2015, 10:06:47 AM »


Quote
I think Al's view of morality is different to yours.
Agreed.

Quote
I don't think objective moral values is a metaphysical question whereas objective morality might be.

If you mean then the actual content of the values (i.e. is X wrong) rather than the question of whether morality is objective then I’m not clear what form you think a proof of this would look like either? I’ve already talked about how someone who believed in OM might have a method for discovering it dependent on their view of OM, but I really don’t know what you are asking for when you say ‘prove’ here. “What is it that would satisfy you that it was proved in relation to questions of this nature?

Gordon

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 18266
Re: Objective morality is independent of opinion....or is it?
« Reply #42 on: June 03, 2015, 10:08:06 AM »
You do know he's going to go for the 'god can't murder' drivel, don't you?
--------
Genesis 9:6
"Whoever sheds human blood, by humans shall their blood be shed; for in the image of God has God made mankind."
God makes a distinction between unjust and just killing here. Over to you to show that the flood was unjust.

On well that is fine then! It is, of course, perfectly 'just' for God to murder all humans bar a chosen few.

In the immortal words of Mr MacInroe, 'you cannot be serious', but sadly you probably are. Good job then that the global flood story is nonsense, and even though it is nonsense the morality portrayed in it stinks to high heaven.

Spud

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7135
Re: Objective morality is independent of opinion....or is it?
« Reply #43 on: June 03, 2015, 10:08:21 AM »
You do know he's going to go for the 'god can't murder' drivel, don't you?
--------
Genesis 9:6
"Whoever sheds human blood, by humans shall their blood be shed; for in the image of God has God made mankind."
God makes a distinction between unjust and just killing here. Over to you to show that the flood was unjust.

Sorry you want it explained to you how the killing of children is unjust?

The theology is this: God allows the world to continue as long as there are people who are being saved. When it gets to the point that the professing believers marry unbelievers, then the children of those marriages become unbelievers and soon there are no believers left- God will not allow the world to continue in that state, because the human heart is corrupt, even in children. You do not need to teach a child how to lie- he will work it out himself.

That's the view of Matthew Henry on the reason for the flood, and why it was just, in Genesis 6. The sons of God are thought to represent religious people, and the daughters of men, irreligious people.

Shaker

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 15639
Re: Objective morality is independent of opinion....or is it?
« Reply #44 on: June 03, 2015, 10:10:06 AM »
Splendid view of children you have there, with a large steaming pat of misogyny thrown in for good measure.

The aggressive anti-theism has just ratcheted up a few notches, which is always welcome.
« Last Edit: June 03, 2015, 10:11:46 AM by Shaker »
Pain, or damage, don't end the world. Or despair, or fucking beatings. The world ends when you're dead. Until then, you got more punishment in store. Stand it like a man, and give some back. - Al Swearengen, Deadwood.

BeRational

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8645
Re: Objective morality is independent of opinion....or is it?
« Reply #45 on: June 03, 2015, 10:11:52 AM »
SPUD

That's a long way of saying that you do not understand that it is unjust!
I see gullible people, everywhere!

Gordon

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 18266
Re: Objective morality is independent of opinion....or is it?
« Reply #46 on: June 03, 2015, 10:13:51 AM »
You do know he's going to go for the 'god can't murder' drivel, don't you?
--------
Genesis 9:6
"Whoever sheds human blood, by humans shall their blood be shed; for in the image of God has God made mankind."
God makes a distinction between unjust and just killing here. Over to you to show that the flood was unjust.

Sorry you want it explained to you how the killing of children is unjust?

The theology is this: God allows the world to continue as long as there are people who are being saved. When it gets to the point that the professing believers marry unbelievers, then the children of those marriages become unbelievers and soon there are no believers left- God will not allow the world to continue in that state, because the human heart is corrupt, even in children. You do not need to teach a child how to lie- he will work it out himself.

That's the view of Matthew Henry on the reason for the flood, and why it was just, in Genesis 6. The sons of God are thought to represent religious people, and the daughters of men, irreligious people.

That is one of the sickest posts I have ever read!
« Last Edit: June 03, 2015, 10:15:29 AM by Gordon »

Dryghtons Toe

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 570
Re: Objective morality is independent of opinion....or is it?
« Reply #47 on: June 03, 2015, 10:32:55 AM »
You do know he's going to go for the 'god can't murder' drivel, don't you?
--------
Genesis 9:6
"Whoever sheds human blood, by humans shall their blood be shed; for in the image of God has God made mankind."
God makes a distinction between unjust and just killing here. Over to you to show that the flood was unjust.

Sorry you want it explained to you how the killing of children is unjust?

The theology is this: God allows the world to continue as long as there are people who are being saved. When it gets to the point that the professing believers marry unbelievers, then the children of those marriages become unbelievers and soon there are no believers left- God will not allow the world to continue in that state, because the human heart is corrupt, even in children. You do not need to teach a child how to lie- he will work it out himself.

That's the view of Matthew Henry on the reason for the flood, and why it was just, in Genesis 6. The sons of God are thought to represent religious people, and the daughters of men, irreligious people.

That is one of the sickest posts I have ever read!

Agreed

horsethorn

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12131
  • Anomalographer
    • "We are star stuff. We are the universe made manifest trying to figure itself out." (Delenn, Babylon 5)
Re: Objective morality is independent of opinion....or is it?
« Reply #48 on: June 03, 2015, 10:33:13 AM »
You do know he's going to go for the 'god can't murder' drivel, don't you?
--------
Genesis 9:6
"Whoever sheds human blood, by humans shall their blood be shed; for in the image of God has God made mankind."
God makes a distinction between unjust and just killing here. Over to you to show that the flood was unjust.

Well, let's look at it within it's own parameters, shall we?

On one side we have a deity who is, allegedly, all-powerful and all-knowing.

On the other side we have a large population of humans, including children below the age of responsibility and some still in the womb.

This all-knowing deity decides that everyone except a handful of people are so evil that they deserve to die.

(Note that this group of people includes a drunkard who wanders round naked, and later curses one of his children for covering him up. Presumably stopping someone from getting a tan is objectively immoral...)

This all-knowing deity appears to not know that there is a difference between nature and nurture, or that people are capable of changing, and rising above their upbringing. This all-knowing deity appears to not know of any way to give people a change of heart (which is odd, considering that so many christians make precisely that claim).

Alternatively, this all-knowing deity is aware that, due to the deterministic nature of the universe he has created, all these people have been created by him solely for the purpose of being killed by drowning.

The there's the 'all-powerful' bit. Are you seriously telling me that an all-powerful deity could think of no other way to sort out the problem than mass killing?

Just: based on or behaving according to what is morally right and fair.

Well, that's an interesting one, isn't it? 'Just' includes the idea of 'moral'. No doubt Spud's argument will include some guff about his god defining morality (although I don't remember him getting involved in the OM discussion), which will, inevitably, mean that his god can't be immoral, and therefore anything his god does is moral and just and good.

That, along with the medieval idea that his god somehow 'owns' us and can do what it likes with our lives, will surely allow Spud to sleep well, safe in the knowledge that millions of people are killed by his god, like wheat being harvested, or some such metaphor.

Those of us who have empathy, and base our morality on a concept such as 'least harm', will look at these alleged events and the arguments for them, and see that they are abhorrent.

To make a claim that a 'just god' could cause the deaths of thousands, if not millions, and then claim that that was at all 'just' is disgusting - especially when combined with the additional claims that this god was all-knowing and all-powerful.

Even we, as limited, flawed, human beings, could devise ways to fix this situation which did not require deaths, and certainly not deaths in such a cruel way. However evil the people were, to have to watch your children and loved ones drowning, while being able to do nothing about it, is repugnant.

And then to think that we are supposed to be happy that they all died, including the recently-born and those not yet born... it boggles the (moral) mind. And yet, it is a large number of the people who do believe this who are then vehemently anti-abortion! Are they trying to make up for all the unborn children killed by their god?


The theology is this: God allows the world to continue as long as there are people who are being saved. When it gets to the point that the professing believers marry unbelievers, then the children of those marriages become unbelievers and soon there are no believers left- God will not allow the world to continue in that state, because the human heart is corrupt, even in children. You do not need to teach a child how to lie- he will work it out himself.

That's the view of Matthew Henry on the reason for the flood, and why it was just, in Genesis 6. The sons of God are thought to represent religious people, and the daughters of men, irreligious people.

I've just seen this reply by Spud. It looks like I was right.

ht
Darth Horsethorn, Most Patient Saint®, Senior Wrangler®, Knight Inerrant® and Gonnagle of the Reformed Church of the Debatable Saints®
Steampunk Panentheist
Not an atheist
"We are star stuff. We are the universe made manifest trying to figure itself out." (Delenn, Babylon 5)

jakswan

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12485
    • Preloved Ads
Re: Objective morality is independent of opinion....or is it?
« Reply #49 on: June 03, 2015, 10:34:13 AM »
"Your position is (a) but you could be wrong, since its independent of your opinion." No. I could be wrong, because I am fallible. I don't think I am in this case though.

I'm not following shouldn't that read.

'you could be wrong'
'no yes'
'I could be wrong'
Doubt is not a pleasant condition, but certainty is absurd.
- Voltaire