If you can't see the permanent and irreconcilable schism between a methodology based on empiricism, methodological naturalism, observation, experiment, hypothesis-testing and theory formation and one based on the polar opposite of all those, then you can't see much at all.
And if YOU can't see the permanent and irreconcilable schism between a methodology based on empiricism, methodological naturalism, observation, experiment, hypothesis-testing and theory formation and the Philosophical materialism you have just expounded, then YOU can't see much at all.
