Triggered by the discussion on another thread about 'generally accepted facts', I am struggling with the idea of what people really mean when they say something is 'true for them'. If it means, as I suspect that it feels correct to them, does that give it any more respectability than liking marmite is true for me. It seems like an attempt to give credibility to an idea in some way more than 'i think' but I don't see that it does.
'True for me' as a choice of phrase, is an expression of ego. Truth is not a commodity, it cannot be owned, traded, divided, apportioned or bartered. When people say 'true for me' they are expressing that a point of view seems unquestionably true from their perspective, and that is fair enough in itself, but the phrase 'true for me' goes further, it seeks to lay a claim of ownership over something that cannot be owned (ie truth).