E-mail address to contact Admin direct is admin@religionethics followed by .co.uk.
The GB athletes won't have the Union Flag on their kit for the World Championships.http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/athletics/33942584Could this be due to the influence of Scottish nationalism?
Can't think why else.
The GB athletes won't have the Union Flag on their kit for the World Championships.http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/athletics/33942584Could this be due to the influence of Scottish nationalism? Can't think why else.Does it matter?
Quote from: Rhiannon on August 15, 2015, 09:19:47 AMThe GB athletes won't have the Union Flag on their kit for the World Championships.http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/athletics/33942584Could this be due to the influence of Scottish nationalism? Can't think why else.Does it matter?-Great stuff!The less we see of the butcher's apron, the better.
The athletes themselves don't seem that chuffed.http://www.theguardian.com/sport/2015/aug/14/british-athletics-union-flag-less-vest-greg-rutherford-kelly-holmesAnd this is Chris Bryant's take:Shadow culture, media and sport secretary Chris Bryant lent his support, tweeting: "Yes @GregJRutherford is right. That vest could easily be French or American."Where is the Union flag? Is someone embarrassed to be British?"Apparently it's been driven by the need to promote British Athletics as a brand name, but it's no Three Lions emblem - unlike other sports it's been the flag that athletes have used in the past. They've left it off the vest which is the part if the kit most visible, co clearly the branding is seen as the most important thing. Still, our athletes get to show their allegiance to Nike. Can't say it bothers me much as I'm not an athlete and I don't watch athletics. But it seems to be ill thought out.
Nice jump on a bandwagon by Bryant.
Quote from: Rhiannon on August 15, 2015, 10:59:25 AMThe athletes themselves don't seem that chuffed.http://www.theguardian.com/sport/2015/aug/14/british-athletics-union-flag-less-vest-greg-rutherford-kelly-holmesAnd this is Chris Bryant's take:Shadow culture, media and sport secretary Chris Bryant lent his support, tweeting: "Yes @GregJRutherford is right. That vest could easily be French or American."Where is the Union flag? Is someone embarrassed to be British?"Apparently it's been driven by the need to promote British Athletics as a brand name, but it's no Three Lions emblem - unlike other sports it's been the flag that athletes have used in the past. They've left it off the vest which is the part if the kit most visible, co clearly the branding is seen as the most important thing. Still, our athletes get to show their allegiance to Nike. Can't say it bothers me much as I'm not an athlete and I don't watch athletics. But it seems to be ill thought out.From looking at the bigger picture they seem to have moved the union flag from the vest to the shorts. Maybe some people don't like that, but its still there. The whole kit seems (as is often the case) to be based on the union flag in terms of colours and geometric design.It is also unclear whether this just Rutherford or a widespread view - he makes that claim, but unsubstantiated.Overall it seems rather poor if an elite athlete seems to be implying that he can't give his best unless the shirt he is wearing is designed in a particular manner. Heaven help a top cyclist who can't stand yellow!!
Quote from: Nearly Sane on August 15, 2015, 12:21:57 PMNice jump on a bandwagon by Bryant.It is corporist twaddle to drop the flag in order to promote the concept and customer experience of ''Brand Athletics''. The Govt must be planning to sell GB athletics off to a global corporation......asurely it must be easier to CGI a logo straight onto a sports kit in motion than first taking a Union Jack off?
Quote from: Anchorman on August 15, 2015, 11:00:17 AMQuote from: Rhiannon on August 15, 2015, 09:19:47 AMThe GB athletes won't have the Union Flag on their kit for the World Championships.http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/athletics/33942584Could this be due to the influence of Scottish nationalism? Can't think why else.Does it matter?-Great stuff!The less we see of the butcher's apron, the better.Unfortunately Anchs your side lost in the referendum......here's union jack bunting to you.
Quote from: Big V on August 15, 2015, 11:02:43 AMQuote from: Anchorman on August 15, 2015, 11:00:17 AMQuote from: Rhiannon on August 15, 2015, 09:19:47 AMThe GB athletes won't have the Union Flag on their kit for the World Championships.http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/athletics/33942584Could this be due to the influence of Scottish nationalism? Can't think why else.Does it matter?-Great stuff!The less we see of the butcher's apron, the better.Unfortunately Anchs your side lost in the referendum......here's union jack bunting to you.-Cheers, Vlad.I'm running short of Andrex.
He's not saying he can't give his best. He's saying he wants to display that he's there for his country.
Anyways, more classy stuff here.http://www.athleticsweekly.com/blog/justin-gatlin-or-jo-pavey-who-would-you-sponsor-20182/Great example for our young people, well done Nike.
Quote from: Rhiannon on August 15, 2015, 01:38:45 PMHe's not saying he can't give his best. He's saying he wants to display that he's there for his country.I think he is actually if his quotes are to be believed:'Rutherford insists the union jack flag on his vest has always been a motivation for his best performances.''Rutherford says the flag on his vest during London 2012 helped inspire his gold medal performance.'
After all, the new kit effectively absorbs................ the flag.