E-mail address to contact Admin direct is admin@religionethics followed by .co.uk.
Common sense is presumably the ability not to do or say daft things. Unfortunately, there is no consensus on what are daft things, so common sense becomes undefinable.
Quote from: Leonard James on September 15, 2015, 08:21:29 AMCommon sense is presumably the ability not to do or say daft things. Unfortunately, there is no consensus on what are daft things, so common sense becomes undefinable.So, are you saying that, realistically, 'General AI', as opposed to 'narrow AI' is ultimately unachievable?
I would say it was the ability to predict outcomes from actions, and to know which outcomes are more desirable.
AI will know to always have a hanky and its bus fare home.
Quote from: Leonard James on September 15, 2015, 08:21:29 AMCommon sense is presumably the ability not to do or say daft things. Unfortunately, there is no consensus on what are daft things, so common sense becomes undefinable.But haven't you just provided a definition?
Quote from: Hope on September 15, 2015, 08:47:48 AMSo, are you saying that, realistically, 'General AI', as opposed to 'narrow AI' is ultimately unachievable?How did you get from the one statement to the other?
So, are you saying that, realistically, 'General AI', as opposed to 'narrow AI' is ultimately unachievable?
]Len suggested that "Unfortunately, there is no consensus on what are daft things, so common sense becomes undefinable". If common sense is indefinable, how do we create something or a process by which a robot could be imbued with something indefinable? Obviously, I am taking my starting point what was said on this morning's BBC Breakfast by someone from Imperial College London - that without our having a means of imbuing common sense, a robot will not be able to be fully AI in the 'General' AI sense.
Which assumes that Len and whoever it was from Imperial are talking about the same thing. I think this is unlikely - I would suggest that the initial definition in Wiki is what the person from Imperial is more likely to be talking about.
Quote from: Nearly Sane on September 15, 2015, 01:57:12 PMWhich assumes that Len and whoever it was from Imperial are talking about the same thing. I think this is unlikely - I would suggest that the initial definition in Wiki is what the person from Imperial is more likely to be talking about.Well, the context of the thread was, I thought, fairly obvious. I realise that some posters seem to have missed that completely. Len doesn't generally miss contexts, so I was assuming that he hadn't this time.
Sorry about that. I don't know how to do what you suggest, but an easy alternative is to log on to http://www.bbc.co.uk/news and down at the bottom of that page is the item 'Meet Erica - the robot just like a person. Hope that helps.
Yippeehttp://tinyurl.com/pjrvveuThanks for that.
Quote from: ekim on September 15, 2015, 04:18:59 PMYippeehttp://tinyurl.com/pjrvveuThanks for that.You need to do it for the post with the long link in it, while removing the long link, otherwise the formatting is still screwed if you view it from certain interfaces.
Over the months the importance or role of common sense has been alluded to here several times, and in the BBC's current Artificial Intelligence 'season' people have been talking about the need to be able to imbue robots with 'common sense' before general AI can really begin to take off.How would folk here define 'common sense' in this context?