Author Topic: Robin Hood Tax  (Read 3968 times)

jakswan

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12485
    • Preloved Ads
Robin Hood Tax
« on: September 28, 2015, 11:35:40 AM »
Will it work? I'm up for taxing the rich as much as we practically can, I suppose the counter argument is it could kill financial services sector.

I'm liking Corbyn and his team certainly changed the political agenda from bland grey safe politics or the super spinners SNP!

Couldn't see it when he was voted in but maybe he can make a real change to UK politics.
Doubt is not a pleasant condition, but certainty is absurd.
- Voltaire

jeremyp

  • Admin Support
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 32502
  • Blurb
    • Sincere Flattery: A blog about computing
Re: Robin Hood Tax
« Reply #1 on: September 28, 2015, 07:51:15 PM »
Rich people can afford to go elsewhere when the tax rate becomes punitive.

The other problem is that there aren't that many of them.
This post and all of JeremyP's posts words certified 100% divinely inspired* -- signed God.
*Platinum infallibility package, terms and conditions may apply

Shaker

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 15639
Re: Robin Hood Tax
« Reply #2 on: September 28, 2015, 08:06:48 PM »
Individuals, possibly; but I've seen one estimate that if all the tax-dodging corporations were made to pay their fair whack it would rake in more than £120 billion a year.
Pain, or damage, don't end the world. Or despair, or fucking beatings. The world ends when you're dead. Until then, you got more punishment in store. Stand it like a man, and give some back. - Al Swearengen, Deadwood.

jeremyp

  • Admin Support
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 32502
  • Blurb
    • Sincere Flattery: A blog about computing
Re: Robin Hood Tax
« Reply #3 on: September 28, 2015, 10:44:06 PM »
Individuals, possibly; but I've seen one estimate that if all the tax-dodging corporations were made to pay their fair whack it would rake in more than £120 billion a year.
The problem with that estimate is that it assumes that the tax dodging corporations would still be here doing business.

In fact, that is the problem with taxes in general: they are inefficient. I'm not saying we should collect no taxes — that would be silly. I'm saying that putting taxes up will not get you the same extra proportion of tax revenue.
This post and all of JeremyP's posts words certified 100% divinely inspired* -- signed God.
*Platinum infallibility package, terms and conditions may apply

Rhiannon

  • Guest
Re: Robin Hood Tax
« Reply #4 on: September 28, 2015, 10:46:30 PM »
I don't think Starbucks and Amazon are going to quit the UK market.

jeremyp

  • Admin Support
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 32502
  • Blurb
    • Sincere Flattery: A blog about computing
Re: Robin Hood Tax
« Reply #5 on: September 28, 2015, 10:54:10 PM »
I don't think Starbucks and Amazon are going to quit the UK market.

The minute that taxes make them unprofitable in the UK they will be gone. That is Starbucks will be gone. I'd be surprised if Amazon turns much of a profit in the UK at all. It's World wide profit is pretty small for a company of its size

http://www.wired.com/2015/07/hey-look-amazon-actually-turned-profit/

This post and all of JeremyP's posts words certified 100% divinely inspired* -- signed God.
*Platinum infallibility package, terms and conditions may apply

ad_orientem

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7928
Re: Robin Hood Tax
« Reply #6 on: September 29, 2015, 07:03:17 AM »
Individuals, possibly; but I've seen one estimate that if all the tax-dodging corporations were made to pay their fair whack it would rake in more than £120 billion a year.
The problem with that estimate is that it assumes that the tax dodging corporations would still be here doing business.

In fact, that is the problem with taxes in general: they are inefficient. I'm not saying we should collect no taxes — that would be silly. I'm saying that putting taxes up will not get you the same extra proportion of tax revenue.

If Starbucks or Amazon can't operate without dodging taxes then, quite frankly, they shouldn't be in business. No one else can get away with it so why should multi-national corporations?
Peace through superior firepower.
Do not believe anything until the Kremlin denies it.

Rhiannon

  • Guest
Re: Robin Hood Tax
« Reply #7 on: September 29, 2015, 07:55:57 AM »
If Starbucks quit the UK the image fallout will be a disaster.

jakswan

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12485
    • Preloved Ads
Re: Robin Hood Tax
« Reply #8 on: September 29, 2015, 09:27:37 AM »
Apparently the Robin Hood tax won't be happening unless every other country does it, reality slaps idealism in the face maybe?

I think most people would agree that those companies generating most of their profit in the UK should pay their tax in the UK. If that loophole is closed its bound to hurt the Irish economy and the plans of NI and Scotland (I think SNP have done one of their flip flops on this issue now though).

Doubt is not a pleasant condition, but certainty is absurd.
- Voltaire

Hope

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 25569
    • Tools With A Mission
Re: Robin Hood Tax
« Reply #9 on: September 29, 2015, 09:47:34 AM »
Rich people can afford to go elsewhere when the tax rate becomes punitive.

The other problem is that there aren't that many of them.
Whilst not saying that they might not need to pay more, the richest 5% (I think that's the figure I read in an Economist article a while back) of the British population already pay 10% of the UK tax bill.  In other words, it wouldn't take that many of them to leave to leave the British economy in bigger problems than it already is.  Furthermore, most of that 5% are industrialists and company owners. 

I think that the quicker the loopholes that exist are closed the better, as at least that would make a whole slice of legal professionals redundant, thus allowing what companies and individuals pay for their services to be directed into the tax system.
Are your, or your friends'/relatives', garages, lofts or sheds full of unused DIY gear, sewing/knitting machines or fabric and haberdashery stuff?

Lists of what is needed and a search engine to find your nearest collector (scroll to bottom for latter) are here:  http://www.twam.uk/donate-tools

Hope

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 25569
    • Tools With A Mission
Re: Robin Hood Tax
« Reply #10 on: September 29, 2015, 09:48:30 AM »
If Starbucks quit the UK the image fallout will be a disaster.
Are you referring to the image fallout for Stabucks or UK plc?
Are your, or your friends'/relatives', garages, lofts or sheds full of unused DIY gear, sewing/knitting machines or fabric and haberdashery stuff?

Lists of what is needed and a search engine to find your nearest collector (scroll to bottom for latter) are here:  http://www.twam.uk/donate-tools

Shaker

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 15639
Re: Robin Hood Tax
« Reply #11 on: September 29, 2015, 11:01:38 AM »
Individuals, possibly; but I've seen one estimate that if all the tax-dodging corporations were made to pay their fair whack it would rake in more than £120 billion a year.
The problem with that estimate is that it assumes that the tax dodging corporations would still be here doing business.

In fact, that is the problem with taxes in general: they are inefficient. I'm not saying we should collect no taxes — that would be silly. I'm saying that putting taxes up will not get you the same extra proportion of tax revenue.

If Starbucks or Amazon can't operate without dodging taxes then, quite frankly, they shouldn't be in business. No one else can get away with it so why should multi-national corporations?
My thoughts exactly. This defeatist, hands-in-the-air attitude of "Oh no, we can't start pressing companies to pay their fair share in case they take their ball and go elsewhere" is quite abhorrent.
Pain, or damage, don't end the world. Or despair, or fucking beatings. The world ends when you're dead. Until then, you got more punishment in store. Stand it like a man, and give some back. - Al Swearengen, Deadwood.

Harrowby Hall

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5038
Re: Robin Hood Tax
« Reply #12 on: September 29, 2015, 02:04:10 PM »
If Starbucks quit the UK the image fallout will be a disaster.

The coffee shop on the corner, the one with the Starbucks logo, is in danger. It is perceived to be "Starbucks". But in all probability it is a franchise, operated by someone employing local labour and paying all appropriate taxes.

The owner of that business has done no wrong. We need to ensure we do not attack the wrong target.
Does Magna Carta mean nothing to you? Did she die in vain?

floo

  • Guest
Re: Robin Hood Tax
« Reply #13 on: September 29, 2015, 02:07:13 PM »
Starbucks would be no loss if it departed from these shores, imo!

Hope

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 25569
    • Tools With A Mission
Re: Robin Hood Tax
« Reply #14 on: September 29, 2015, 02:52:52 PM »
If Starbucks quit the UK the image fallout will be a disaster.

The coffee shop on the corner, the one with the Starbucks logo, is in danger. It is perceived to be "Starbucks". But in all probability it is a franchise, operated by someone employing local labour and paying all appropriate taxes.

The owner of that business has done no wrong. We need to ensure we do not attack the wrong target.
In fact, almost all the big groups - like Starbucks, Costa, MacDonalds, etc - are franchised.  As you say, the local franchisees probably submit their dues to HQ in good faith, only for the HQ to fail to pay their dues.
Are your, or your friends'/relatives', garages, lofts or sheds full of unused DIY gear, sewing/knitting machines or fabric and haberdashery stuff?

Lists of what is needed and a search engine to find your nearest collector (scroll to bottom for latter) are here:  http://www.twam.uk/donate-tools

Rhiannon

  • Guest
Re: Robin Hood Tax
« Reply #15 on: September 29, 2015, 03:11:07 PM »
Starbucks would be no loss if it departed from these shores, imo!

Why?

jeremyp

  • Admin Support
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 32502
  • Blurb
    • Sincere Flattery: A blog about computing
Re: Robin Hood Tax
« Reply #16 on: September 29, 2015, 08:30:56 PM »

If Starbucks or Amazon can't operate without dodging taxes then, quite frankly, they shouldn't be in business. No one else can get away with it so why should multi-national corporations?
I totally agree. Your point?
This post and all of JeremyP's posts words certified 100% divinely inspired* -- signed God.
*Platinum infallibility package, terms and conditions may apply

jeremyp

  • Admin Support
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 32502
  • Blurb
    • Sincere Flattery: A blog about computing
Re: Robin Hood Tax
« Reply #17 on: September 29, 2015, 08:34:06 PM »
If Starbucks quit the UK the image fallout will be a disaster.
Not as much a disaster as being unable to operate profitably in the UK.
This post and all of JeremyP's posts words certified 100% divinely inspired* -- signed God.
*Platinum infallibility package, terms and conditions may apply

ad_orientem

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7928
Re: Robin Hood Tax
« Reply #18 on: September 29, 2015, 08:36:36 PM »

If Starbucks or Amazon can't operate without dodging taxes then, quite frankly, they shouldn't be in business. No one else can get away with it so why should multi-national corporations?
I totally agree. Your point?

I thought that was obvious, apart from the fact that I replied to the wrong post. ::)
Peace through superior firepower.
Do not believe anything until the Kremlin denies it.

Rhiannon

  • Guest
Re: Robin Hood Tax
« Reply #19 on: September 29, 2015, 09:04:27 PM »
If Starbucks quit the UK the image fallout will be a disaster.
Not as much a disaster as being unable to operate profitably in the UK.

I meant the UK's image.

jeremyp

  • Admin Support
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 32502
  • Blurb
    • Sincere Flattery: A blog about computing
Re: Robin Hood Tax
« Reply #20 on: September 29, 2015, 09:32:57 PM »

My thoughts exactly. This defeatist, hands-in-the-air attitude of "Oh no, we can't start pressing companies to pay their fair share in case they take their ball and go elsewhere" is quite abhorrent.

There is nothing defeatist, it is a reality. Raising taxes is a deterrent to doing business which means that raising taxes by 20% means you will not get 20% extra revenue and you will put some companies that were marginal before you raised taxes out of business — permanently.

Here is an example, shamelessly ripped off from Tim Harford. Let's say I own a coffee shop and I calculate my costs per latte are £1.98 so I determine that the minimum price I'll sell a latte for is £2.00. You come in and you want to buy a latte. The maximum you are prepared to pay for it is £2.30. I will obviously sell you a coffee and the exact price you pay will be between £2 and £2.30 depending on how many other coffee shops are in the vicinity.

The government says "right we want some of that coffee action so we are going to put a 20% tax on each cup of coffee". Now the minimum I can sell a cup of coffee for is £2.40 which is more than you are prepared to pay. So you don't buy a coffee, I don't sell one and most importantly, the government doesn't get its 20% either. In fact they also lose out on the VAT, corporation tax and potentially income tax if I have to lay staff off.
This post and all of JeremyP's posts words certified 100% divinely inspired* -- signed God.
*Platinum infallibility package, terms and conditions may apply

jeremyp

  • Admin Support
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 32502
  • Blurb
    • Sincere Flattery: A blog about computing
Re: Robin Hood Tax
« Reply #21 on: September 29, 2015, 09:35:34 PM »
Starbucks would be no loss if it departed from these shores, imo!

Why?

The coffee is rubbish. Well, the lattι is — it doesn't taste like there is any coffee in it. But I expect all the thousands of people that Starbucks employ and their suppliers will not share Floo's opinion.
This post and all of JeremyP's posts words certified 100% divinely inspired* -- signed God.
*Platinum infallibility package, terms and conditions may apply

ad_orientem

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7928
Re: Robin Hood Tax
« Reply #22 on: September 29, 2015, 09:47:37 PM »

My thoughts exactly. This defeatist, hands-in-the-air attitude of "Oh no, we can't start pressing companies to pay their fair share in case they take their ball and go elsewhere" is quite abhorrent.

There is nothing defeatist, it is a reality. Raising taxes is a deterrent to doing business which means that raising taxes by 20% means you will not get 20% extra revenue and you will put some companies that were marginal before you raised taxes out of business — permanently.

Here is an example, shamelessly ripped off from Tim Harford. Let's say I own a coffee shop and I calculate my costs per latte are £1.98 so I determine that the minimum price I'll sell a latte for is £2.00. You come in and you want to buy a latte. The maximum you are prepared to pay for it is £2.30. I will obviously sell you a coffee and the exact price you pay will be between £2 and £2.30 depending on how many other coffee shops are in the vicinity.

The government says "right we want some of that coffee action so we are going to put a 20% tax on each cup of coffee". Now the minimum I can sell a cup of coffee for is £2.40 which is more than you are prepared to pay. So you don't buy a coffee, I don't sell one and most importantly, the government doesn't get its 20% either. In fact they also lose out on the VAT, corporation tax and potentially income tax if I have to lay staff off.

It's only "reality" because governments let them get away with it.
Peace through superior firepower.
Do not believe anything until the Kremlin denies it.

jeremyp

  • Admin Support
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 32502
  • Blurb
    • Sincere Flattery: A blog about computing
Re: Robin Hood Tax
« Reply #23 on: September 29, 2015, 09:59:39 PM »

My thoughts exactly. This defeatist, hands-in-the-air attitude of "Oh no, we can't start pressing companies to pay their fair share in case they take their ball and go elsewhere" is quite abhorrent.

There is nothing defeatist, it is a reality. Raising taxes is a deterrent to doing business which means that raising taxes by 20% means you will not get 20% extra revenue and you will put some companies that were marginal before you raised taxes out of business — permanently.

Here is an example, shamelessly ripped off from Tim Harford. Let's say I own a coffee shop and I calculate my costs per latte are £1.98 so I determine that the minimum price I'll sell a latte for is £2.00. You come in and you want to buy a latte. The maximum you are prepared to pay for it is £2.30. I will obviously sell you a coffee and the exact price you pay will be between £2 and £2.30 depending on how many other coffee shops are in the vicinity.

The government says "right we want some of that coffee action so we are going to put a 20% tax on each cup of coffee". Now the minimum I can sell a cup of coffee for is £2.40 which is more than you are prepared to pay. So you don't buy a coffee, I don't sell one and most importantly, the government doesn't get its 20% either. In fact they also lose out on the VAT, corporation tax and potentially income tax if I have to lay staff off.

It's only "reality" because governments let them get away with it.

Did you actually read any of my post?
This post and all of JeremyP's posts words certified 100% divinely inspired* -- signed God.
*Platinum infallibility package, terms and conditions may apply

jakswan

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12485
    • Preloved Ads
Re: Robin Hood Tax
« Reply #24 on: September 29, 2015, 10:24:17 PM »

My thoughts exactly. This defeatist, hands-in-the-air attitude of "Oh no, we can't start pressing companies to pay their fair share in case they take their ball and go elsewhere" is quite abhorrent.

There is nothing defeatist, it is a reality. Raising taxes is a deterrent to doing business which means that raising taxes by 20% means you will not get 20% extra revenue and you will put some companies that were marginal before you raised taxes out of business — permanently.

Here is an example, shamelessly ripped off from Tim Harford. Let's say I own a coffee shop and I calculate my costs per latte are £1.98 so I determine that the minimum price I'll sell a latte for is £2.00. You come in and you want to buy a latte. The maximum you are prepared to pay for it is £2.30. I will obviously sell you a coffee and the exact price you pay will be between £2 and £2.30 depending on how many other coffee shops are in the vicinity.

The government says "right we want some of that coffee action so we are going to put a 20% tax on each cup of coffee". Now the minimum I can sell a cup of coffee for is £2.40 which is more than you are prepared to pay. So you don't buy a coffee, I don't sell one and most importantly, the government doesn't get its 20% either. In fact they also lose out on the VAT, corporation tax and potentially income tax if I have to lay staff off.

I kind of agree but that doesn't accurately describe big corps like Google. I work for a company that spends £2.5m a year with Google, we pay Google Dublin (none of the adverts run in Ireland), so Ireland collects the corp tax, but the profit is generated in the UK.

As I understand it Apple will sell you a phone that costs £500 but £100 to make, Apple Luxembourg sell the phone to Apple UK for £450.

There are many like Ado that peddle easy answers it will interesting to see how Corbyn reacts, who had this idealism for years, hits reality. I'm already seeing some spin from Corbyn already, as one commentator put it, this isn't new politics its old politics done badly. 
Doubt is not a pleasant condition, but certainty is absurd.
- Voltaire