E-mail address to contact Admin direct is admin@religionethics followed by .co.uk.
It doesn't, since provided it is supported by an appropriate methodology you are perfectly free to present evidence that is mutually exclusive from naturalism - over to you.So you have, but you've failed to demonstrate the latter.
Not only me but others have as well, Walter. As I've pointed out, they generally get dismissed on the very grounds that they are non-naturalistic.Whilst I wouldn't claim wikipedia as a foolproof source, I found this opening gambit on reality interesting:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reality
Have you heard of non-realistic Christianity Maeght?
Another poster stated on another thread that we couldn't have come from nothing, so by the same token nor could the deity. 'He was always there', doesn't cut the mustard, imo!
There is no slavery in the UK.
For those who believe god is responsible for all creation, they still haven't explained who created god. 'God was always there', isn't an explanation.
I disagree with modern slavery but am aware that it has increased along with secularisation in this country. I have never kept slaves and don't intend to since it is not fine.
I think that you will find the odd case here and there and now and ten, but these days usualy only individual cases rather than a large scale trade.Although it seems that people trafficing of individuals from the old Eastern Bloc countries into the UK for the sex trade is quite frequent.
What on earth has that got to do with this thread?