Attitudes and behaviour.

[jakswan]

But it's very rare that I lose my patience to the point that I deliver personal insults[/b]. For you, however, insults are pretty much all there is.

Total lie!

Show me a post in which I deliver a personal insult and I'll show twenty in which I don't.

[/b]

    Is that a serious comment, or are you joking?  It's akin to saying, "There were twenty puppies in the room, and I only kicked one of them."  You're absurd!

From the first page of posting history these are the insults that BA has posted things that might be examples of bad attitudes and behaviour:-

Hypocrites!  And, as usual, foul-mouthed with it.
You're absurd!
Nothing to do this evening?   Run out of crayons or something?
he likes to represent me as an abuser, but he is precisely that himself,
You are nothing but a foul-mouthed, pretentious hypocrite.
I'm consistently told I'm this that and the other, but the dummies still post to me!
Total lie!
your contribution would disgrace a six-year-old.

Take a long hard look in the mirror BA.

[SusanDoris]

Unfortunately, the image he sees in the mirror will be only what he deludes himself he is. 

[bluehillside Retd.]

Vladdy Straw Boy,

The only one getting their beliefs dismantled is you.

Why would you ever waste the time to lie about that? I've set out the arguments perfectly clearly - BA could attempt a rebuttal or not as he wishes, but instead he's variously spat the dummy, used insult, avoided any question or challenge and generally swallowed wholesale the Vlad playbook. Then you pitch up and call that being "dismantled".

Really?

Good grief!
 

Any progress on the probability of philosophical naturalism?

I'll dismantle it on the latest wreckage of a thread you've started.

[BashfulAnthony]

But it's very rare that I lose my patience to the point that I deliver personal insults[/b]. For you, however, insults are pretty much all there is.

Total lie!

Show me a post in which I deliver a personal insult and I'll show twenty in which I don't.

[/b]

    Is that a serious comment, or are you joking?  It's akin to saying, "There were twenty puppies in the room, and I only kicked one of them."  You're absurd!

From the first page of posting history these are the insults that BA has posted things that might be examples of bad attitudes and behaviour:-

Hypocrites!  And, as usual, foul-mouthed with it.
You're absurd!
Nothing to do this evening?   Run out of crayons or something?
he likes to represent me as an abuser, but he is precisely that himself,
You are nothing but a foul-mouthed, pretentious hypocrite.
I'm consistently told I'm this that and the other, but the dummies still post to me!
Total lie!
your contribution would disgrace a six-year-old.

Take a long hard look in the mirror BA.

And you take a hard look at your own record.  You are hardly an example of propriety in posting.  Hypocrite!  Unless you have a record of never having posted an"insult,"  then criticise me:  you haven't.  The comments you have taken the trouble to gather there  (surprised you have the time ) are not exactly criminal;  and I do manage to avoid the ignorant use of expletives:  do you?

[BashfulAnthony]

Unfortunately, the image he sees in the mirror will be only what he deludes himself he is.

What are you on about?  Silly and infantile comment!

[BashfulAnthony]

Vladdy Straw Boy,

The only one getting their beliefs dismantled is you.

Why would you ever waste the time to lie about that? I've set out the arguments perfectly clearly - BA could attempt a rebuttal or not as he wishes, but instead he's variously spat the dummy, used insult, avoided any question or challenge and generally swallowed wholesale the Vlad playbook. Then you pitch up and call that being "dismantled".

Really?

Good grief!
 

Any progress on the probability of philosophical naturalism?

I'll dismantle it on the latest wreckage of a thread you've started.

Do you have any idea whatsoever what you are talking about?  I haven't.  I haven't swallowed any "playbook."  It's ony the likes of you who are still at the playbook stage!   

[Owlswing]

Vladdy Straw Boy,

The only one getting their beliefs dismantled is you.

Why would you ever waste the time to lie about that? I've set out the arguments perfectly clearly - BA could attempt a rebuttal or not as he wishes, but instead he's variously spat the dummy, used insult, avoided any question or challenge and generally swallowed wholesale the Vlad playbook. Then you pitch up and call that being "dismantled".

Really?

Good grief!
 

Any progress on the probability of philosophical naturalism?

I'll dismantle it on the latest wreckage of a thread you've started.

Do you have any idea whatsoever what you are talking about?  I haven't.  I haven't swallowed any "playbook."  It'a ony the likes of you who are still at the playbook stage!   

Idiot - "playbook" (as used by Blue) - a term used in American Football that shows the moves to be used in the game.

Vlad's playbook shows how to talk crap, and how to invent stupid words ending in "ism".

[jakswan]

And you take a hard look at your own record.  You are hardly an example of propriety in posting.  Hypocrite!

Neither have I started a topic complaining about it.

Unless you have a record of never having posted an"insult,"  then criticise me:  you haven't.  The comments you have taken the trouble to gather there  (surprised you have the time ) are not exactly criminal;  and I do manage to avoid the ignorant use of expletives:  do you?

Fuck no I don't have a problem with the odd expletive. I'm not criticising you for posting an insult I'm criticising you for starting a thread about 'bad attitudes and behaviour' and then behaving badly.

I repeat the examples I posted were from the first page of your post history, just one page.

I challenge you to find anyone with as many posts with bad attitudes and behaviour on the first page of their posting history as yourself.

Look BA your not a bad bloke and would love to debate more issues with you but I don't think debate with you is possible because it descends into trading insults.

[Owlswing]

And you take a hard look at your own record.  You are hardly an example of propriety in posting.  Hypocrite!

Neither have I started a topic complaining about it.

Unless you have a record of never having posted an"insult,"  then criticise me:  you haven't.  The comments you have taken the trouble to gather there  (surprised you have the time ) are not exactly criminal;  and I do manage to avoid the ignorant use of expletives:  do you?

Fuck no I don't have a problem with the odd expletive. I'm not criticising you for posting an insult I'm criticising you for starting a thread about 'bad attitudes and behaviour' and then behaving badly.

I repeat the examples I posted were from the first page of your post history, just one page.

I challenge you to find anyone with as many posts with bad attitudes and behaviour on the first page of their posting history as yourself.

Look BA your not a bad bloke and would love to debate more issues with you but I don't think debate with you is possible because it descends into trading insults.

It is also impossible to debate with someone who is convinced that all he says is the truth the whole truth and nothing but the truth imparted to him personally by his god. In fact he is so infallible that he should be proposed as the next Pope.

[BashfulAnthony]

And you take a hard look at your own record.  You are hardly an example of propriety in posting.  Hypocrite!

Neither have I started a topic complaining about it.

Unless you have a record of never having posted an"insult,"  then criticise me:  you haven't.  The comments you have taken the trouble to gather there  (surprised you have the time ) are not exactly criminal;  and I do manage to avoid the ignorant use of expletives:  do you?

Fuck no I don't have a problem with the odd expletive. I'm not criticising you for posting an insult I'm criticising you for starting a thread about 'bad attitudes and behaviour' and then behaving badly.

I repeat the examples I posted were from the first page of your post history, just one page.

I challenge you to find anyone with as many posts with bad attitudes and behaviour on the first page of their posting history as yourself.

Look BA your not a bad bloke and would love to debate more issues with you but I don't think debate with you is possible because it descends into trading insults.

It is also impossible to debate with someone who is convinced that all he says is the truth the whole truth and nothing but the truth imparted to him personally by his god. In fact he is so infallible that he should be proposed as the next Pope.

I wonder who that fatuous description is supposed to apply to? 

[Owlswing]

And you take a hard look at your own record.  You are hardly an example of propriety in posting.  Hypocrite!

Neither have I started a topic complaining about it.

Unless you have a record of never having posted an"insult,"  then criticise me:  you haven't.  The comments you have taken the trouble to gather there  (surprised you have the time ) are not exactly criminal;  and I do manage to avoid the ignorant use of expletives:  do you?

Fuck no I don't have a problem with the odd expletive. I'm not criticising you for posting an insult I'm criticising you for starting a thread about 'bad attitudes and behaviour' and then behaving badly.

I repeat the examples I posted were from the first page of your post history, just one page.

I challenge you to find anyone with as many posts with bad attitudes and behaviour on the first page of their posting history as yourself.

Look BA your not a bad bloke and would love to debate more issues with you but I don't think debate with you is possible because it descends into trading insults.

It is also impossible to debate with someone who is convinced that all he says is the truth the whole truth and nothing but the truth imparted to him personally by his god. In fact he is so infallible that he should be proposed as the next Pope.

I wonder who that fatuous description is supposed to apply to?

Go look in a mirror! You might even be able to spot your halo.

[jeremyp]

Is that a serious comment, or are you joking?  It's akin to saying, "There were twenty puppies in the room, and I only kicked one of them."  You're absurd!

Wait a minute.. you think that animal cruelty is only as bad as posting an insult on an internet forum? And you a dog owner too.

I notice you haven't even tried to meet the challenge. Obviously you realise you can't.

[Sassy]

And you take a hard look at your own record.  You are hardly an example of propriety in posting.  Hypocrite!

Neither have I started a topic complaining about it.

Unless you have a record of never having posted an"insult,"  then criticise me:  you haven't.  The comments you have taken the trouble to gather there  (surprised you have the time ) are not exactly criminal;  and I do manage to avoid the ignorant use of expletives:  do you?

Fuck no I don't have a problem with the odd expletive. I'm not criticising you for posting an insult I'm criticising you for starting a thread about 'bad attitudes and behaviour' and then behaving badly.

I repeat the examples I posted were from the first page of your post history, just one page.

I challenge you to find anyone with as many posts with bad attitudes and behaviour on the first page of their posting history as yourself.

Look BA your not a bad bloke and would love to debate more issues with you but I don't think debate with you is possible because it descends into trading insults.

It is also impossible to debate with someone who is convinced that all he says is the truth the whole truth and nothing but the truth imparted to him personally by his god. In fact he is so infallible that he should be proposed as the next Pope.

Your reply actually Tickled me!

How would know if BA actually did have the truth or not?

Well! Just asking...

[Sassy]

Is that a serious comment, or are you joking?  It's akin to saying, "There were twenty puppies in the room, and I only kicked one of them."  You're absurd!

Wait a minute.. you think that animal cruelty is only as bad as posting an insult on an internet forum? And you a dog owner too.

I notice you haven't even tried to meet the challenge. Obviously you realise you can't.

Are you deliberately missing the point...

It isn't about how many dogs were there. But the fact kicking one dog regardless of how many there are to kick, is WRONG. Whether 20 or 1 dog the kicking is wrong.

In other words you are trying to make a wrong right by saying " But there were 20 dogs there and I only kicked one"  What you are not getting is that you were wrong and you cannot excuse yourself.

[jeremyp]

Are you deliberately missing the point...

Nope. I think you are missing the point. BA claimed that writing an insult on a forum is akin to kicking one puppy out of twenty. He's compared something that might, at worst, cause some hurt feelings to animal cruelty. Instead of merely pointing this out, I turned it around to show the speciousness of his comparison.

I should have realised it would be too subtle for some people.

[Owlswing]

And you take a hard look at your own record.  You are hardly an example of propriety in posting.  Hypocrite!

Neither have I started a topic complaining about it.

Unless you have a record of never having posted an"insult,"  then criticise me:  you haven't.  The comments you have taken the trouble to gather there  (surprised you have the time ) are not exactly criminal;  and I do manage to avoid the ignorant use of expletives:  do you?

Fuck no I don't have a problem with the odd expletive. I'm not criticising you for posting an insult I'm criticising you for starting a thread about 'bad attitudes and behaviour' and then behaving badly.

I repeat the examples I posted were from the first page of your post history, just one page.

I challenge you to find anyone with as many posts with bad attitudes and behaviour on the first page of their posting history as yourself.

Look BA your not a bad bloke and would love to debate more issues with you but I don't think debate with you is possible because it descends into trading insults.

It is also impossible to debate with someone who is convinced that all he says is the truth the whole truth and nothing but the truth imparted to him personally by his god. In fact he is so infallible that he should be proposed as the next Pope.

Your reply actually Tickled me!

How would know if BA actually did have the truth or not?

Well! Just asking...

Once again you miss the point!

It doesn't matter if I think he actually has a truth, much less THE truth - what matters is the HE thinks he has it and cannot stand the fact the the majority of others think he is full of crap!

[BashfulAnthony]

Is that a serious comment, or are you joking?  It's akin to saying, "There were twenty puppies in the room, and I only kicked one of them."  You're absurd!

Wait a minute.. you think that animal cruelty is only as bad as posting an insult on an internet forum? And you a dog owner too.

I notice you haven't even tried to meet the challenge. Obviously you realise you can't.

Are you deliberately missing the point...

It isn't about how many dogs were there. But the fact kicking one dog regardless of how many there are to kick, is WRONG. Whether 20 or 1 dog the kicking is wrong.

In other words you are trying to make a wrong right by saying " But there were 20 dogs there and I only kicked one"  What you are not getting is that you were wrong and you cannot excuse yourself.

Thank you, Sassy.  I hope jeremy, and the other children, are suitably shamed by having the point of my comment spelled out to them by you.  I

 should have realised he wouldn't get it.

[BashfulAnthony]

And you take a hard look at your own record.  You are hardly an example of propriety in posting.  Hypocrite!

Neither have I started a topic complaining about it.

On the subject of that latter substance, it seems, according to Yahoo, that there is an increasing amount of malign witchcraft current at the moment.  What were you doing this week-end?   
Unless you have a record of never having posted an"insult,"  then criticise me:  you haven't.  The comments you have taken the trouble to gather there  (surprised you have the time ) are not exactly criminal;  and I do manage to avoid the ignorant use of expletives:  do you?

Fuck no I don't have a problem with the odd expletive. I'm not criticising you for posting an insult I'm criticising you for starting a thread about 'bad attitudes and behaviour' and then behaving badly.

I repeat the examples I posted were from the first page of your post history, just one page.

I challenge you to find anyone with as many posts with bad attitudes and behaviour on the first page of their posting history as yourself.

Look BA your not a bad bloke and would love to debate more issues with you but I don't think debate with you is possible because it descends into trading insults.

It is also impossible to debate with someone who is convinced that all he says is the truth the whole truth and nothing but the truth imparted to him personally by his god. In fact he is so infallible that he should be proposed as the next Pope.

Your reply actually Tickled me!

How would know if BA actually did have the truth or not?

Well! Just asking...

Once again you miss the point!

It doesn't matter if I think he actually has a truth, much less THE truth - what matters is the HE thinks he has it and cannot stand the fact the the majority of others think he is full of crap!

[BashfulAnthony]

And you take a hard look at your own record.  You are hardly an example of propriety in posting.  Hypocrite!

Neither have I started a topic complaining about it.

Unless you have a record of never having posted an"insult,"  then criticise me:  you haven't.  The comments you have taken the trouble to gather there  (surprised you have the time ) are not exactly criminal;  and I do manage to avoid the ignorant use of expletives:  do you?

Fuck no I don't have a problem with the odd expletive. I'm not criticising you for posting an insult I'm criticising you for starting a thread about 'bad attitudes and behaviour' and then behaving badly.

I repeat the examples I posted were from the first page of your post history, just one page.

I challenge you to find anyone with as many posts with bad attitudes and behaviour on the first page of their posting history as yourself.

Look BA your not a bad bloke and would love to debate more issues with you but I don't think debate with you is possible because it descends into trading insults.

It is also impossible to debate with someone who is convinced that all he says is the truth the whole truth and nothing but the truth imparted to him personally by his god. In fact he is so infallible that he should be proposed as the next Pope.

Your reply actually Tickled me!

How would know if BA actually did have the truth or not?

Well! Just asking...

Once again you miss the point!

It doesn't matter if I think he actually has a truth, much less THE truth - what matters is the HE thinks he has it and cannot stand the fact the the majority of others think he is full of crap!

On the subject of that latter substance, it seems, according to Yahoo, that there is an increasing amount of malign witchcraft current at the moment.  What were you doing this week-end?   

[Sassy]

And you take a hard look at your own record.  You are hardly an example of propriety in posting.  Hypocrite!

Neither have I started a topic complaining about it.

Unless you have a record of never having posted an"insult,"  then criticise me:  you haven't.  The comments you have taken the trouble to gather there  (surprised you have the time ) are not exactly criminal;  and I do manage to avoid the ignorant use of expletives:  do you?

Fuck no I don't have a problem with the odd expletive. I'm not criticising you for posting an insult I'm criticising you for starting a thread about 'bad attitudes and behaviour' and then behaving badly.

I repeat the examples I posted were from the first page of your post history, just one page.

I challenge you to find anyone with as many posts with bad attitudes and behaviour on the first page of their posting history as yourself.

Look BA your not a bad bloke and would love to debate more issues with you but I don't think debate with you is possible because it descends into trading insults.

It is also impossible to debate with someone who is convinced that all he says is the truth the whole truth and nothing but the truth imparted to him personally by his god. In fact he is so infallible that he should be proposed as the next Pope.

Your reply actually Tickled me!

How would know if BA actually did have the truth or not?

Well! Just asking...

Once again you miss the point!

It doesn't matter if I think he actually has a truth, much less THE truth - what matters is the HE thinks he has it and cannot stand the fact the the majority of others think he is full of crap!

But the fact is that ATHEISTS wouldn't know... which is my point.

It is you who missed the point. The point is that you and the person answering BA are not in a position to be able to tell whether what he says is true...

Penny dropped...

[Leonard James]

But the fact is that ATHEISTS wouldn't know... which is my point.

Any more than you do!

Penny dropped?

[Owlswing]

. . . according to Yahoo, that there is an increasing amount of malign witchcraft current at the moment.  What were you doing this week-end?   

On the grounds that I do not believe a word about witchcraft posted by a Christian without back-up - a link to Yahoo article please.

[jeremyp]

I hope jeremy, and the other children,

Anthony breaks his own rules again.

are suitably shamed by having the point of my comment spelled out to them by you. 

I hope you are suitably shamed by me having to spell out the meaning of my comment to you — and Sassy.

I'm semi tempted to join your other forum to find out why you were banned from it, although it will obviously be because you are unable to carry on a conversation without resorting to insult.

[BashfulAnthony]

I hope jeremy, and the other children,

Anthony breaks his own rules again.

are suitably shamed by having the point of my comment spelled out to them by you. 

I hope you are suitably shamed by me having to spell out the meaning of my comment to you — and Sassy.

I'm semi temp

You are very precious  -  hardly abuse, especially when you are consistently worse.

Please look on the forum, and when you have ascertained I was not banned, I will expect an apology for that abusive suggestion.  You would certainly have been given your marching orders, for your foul, gutter-snipe, language alone;  not to mention your aggressive manner.  You have only addressed my posts today to be confrontational:  you are a first-class hypocrite!

[BashfulAnthony]

I hope jeremy, and the other children,

Anthony breaks his own rules again.

are suitably shamed by having the point of my comment spelled out to them by you. 

I hope you are suitably shamed by me having to spell out the meaning of my comment to you — and Sassy.

I'm semi tempted to join your other forum to find out why you were banned from it, although it will obviously be because you are unable to carry on a conversation without resorting to insult.

You are very precious  -  hardly abuse, and you are consistently worse.

Please look on the forum, though I doubt you will, as it will expose your unpleasant inclination to make vicious accusations, without grounds.  Please, go ahead and when you have ascertained I was not banned, I will expect an apology for such an abusive suggestion.  You would certainly have been given your marching orders, for your foul, gutter-snipe, language alone;  not to mention your aggressive manner.  You have only addressed my posts today to be confrontational:  you are a first-class hypocrite!