Attitudes and behaviour.

[BashfulAnthony]

A very typically pagan attitude!

A very typical BA stupid attitude.

A very typical ignorant Leonard attitude.

[ippy]

All we get on here is pedantic, presumptuous comment, with no regard for the sincere beliefs of other human beings

Ah your talking about others?

For me that sums up your own comments but years of experience dealing with you tells me that like other (mainly fundies) you can't see your own obnoxious replies and often snide comments.

Of course like Sass, CM oh and of course Vlad it doesn't matter how many people tell you your wrong or being a idiot it's always their fault not yours 

the constant infantile use of terms like, "magic," fairies," "spaghetti monsters," etc. 

I'm sure the believers of magic, fairies and spaghetti monsters get the same ridicule but if your going to come out with nonsense as you do that can't back up your beliefs then I don't know how you expect others to take them seriously?

Seeing that atheists get much the same abuse maybe the answer to your problem is grow a set of f off.. just a suggestion 

I don't have a problem  -  it is the likes of you who have the problem, that's why you spend your days denying its existence.

Why would anybody that thinks the whole idea of god or gods is only for deluded people, want to deny the existence of something that's not there in the first place; I'm not denying the existence any kind of god, they don't exist in the first place to deny, other than in peoples minds. Unless, of course, you can prove me wrong which would be necessary due to the present lack of credible evidence, like zero evidence, to support this cranky idea of yours BA.

ippy
ippy     

[BashfulAnthony]

All we get on here is pedantic, presumptuous comment, with no regard for the sincere beliefs of other human beings

Ah your talking about others?

For me that sums up your own comments but years of experience dealing with you tells me that like other (mainly fundies) you can't see your own obnoxious replies and often snide comments.

Of course like Sass, CM oh and of course Vlad it doesn't matter how many people tell you your wrong or being a idiot it's always their fault not yours 

the constant infantile use of terms like, "magic," fairies," "spaghetti monsters," etc. 

I'm sure the believers of magic, fairies and spaghetti monsters get the same ridicule but if your going to come out with nonsense as you do that can't back up your beliefs then I don't know how you expect others to take them seriously?

Seeing that atheists get much the same abuse maybe the answer to your problem is grow a set of f off.. just a suggestion 

I don't have a problem  -  it is the likes of you who have the problem, that's why you spend your days denying its existence.

Why would anybody that thinks the whole idea of god or gods is only for deluded people, want to deny the existence of something that's not there in the first place; I'm not denying the existence any kind of god, they don't exist in the first place to deny, other than in peoples minds. Unless, of course, you can prove me wrong which would be necessary due to the present lack of credible evidence, like zero evidence, to support this cranky idea of yours BA.

ippy
ippy   

it's not merely me, dear ippy, but a couple of billion others, too, many of whom are more likely to be correct than you:  or, rather, all of whom are more likely to be correct than you.       

[Aruntraveller]

but a couple of billion others

Ooh look  One for all you trainspotters.

The Earth must be flat.

[BashfulAnthony]

but a couple of billion others

Ooh look  One for all you trainspotters.

The Earth must be flat.

Is that supposed to be funny, or perceptive?  It's neither.

[Aruntraveller]

but a couple of billion others

Ooh look  One for all you trainspotters.

The Earth must be flat.

Is that supposed to be funny, or perceptive?  It's neither.

Ooh you're exceptionally grumpy at the moment.

Merely pointing out that at one time if one relied merely on numbers the Earth would indeed be flat.

Your argument citing 2 billion counts for nothing despite the huge number.

[Nearly Sane]

but a couple of billion others

Ooh look  One for all you trainspotters.

The Earth must be flat.

Is that supposed to be funny, or perceptive?  It's neither.

Ooh you're exceptionally grumpy sat the moment.

One is reminded of Dorothy Parker's comment about the announcement of Calvin Coolidge's death

[King Oberon]

I don't have a problem  -  it is the likes of you who have the problem, that's why you spend your days denying its existence.

Oh BA your pure comedy gold.. or you would be if you didn't take yourself so seriously (fortunately you are the only one who does!).

So you want me to make the same points again?

OK might as well just cut and paste and hopefully this time you might get someone to read/explain it to you, any 5 year old handy? 

Of course it is BA as your posts frequently infer it's always someone else with the problem 

See that is the pattern of fundies.. they blindly just keep repeating the same things rather than actually questioning themselves and their "beliefs" who knows everyone else might be right and you might be wrong (if you can conceive of such a possibility) 

Sorry to disappoint you but I spend as much time denying the existence of the god of your imagination as I do denying the existence of unicorns and pixies.. none, except of course when I have to put you right on dreams and reality

Again you don't seem to understand BA I spend the same amount of days denying unicorns as I do denying your personal unicorns/gods.

Of course you could make this conversation mute by actually supplying some evidence for either gods or unicorns... your choice 

You see my mentally challenged friend I don't have a problem with peoples personal beliefs unicorns or otherwise so long as they a) don't affect my life and b) you don't try and make out that they in some way a 'fact'.

As I have pointed out faith is faith, unicornist and theists can believe what they want but it doesn't make it real.

Take a leaf out of Gonnagles book and who goes on faith and it's personal to him something I can accept.

[Gonnagle]

Dear Rabbac,

Take a leaf out of Gonnagles book and who goes on faith and it's personal to him something I can accept.

Tis true old son, my gripe is ( and has been for a long time ) organised religion telling us how to approach God.

Gonnagle.

[King Oberon]

Well if it's a personal relationship why would you need a middle man 

[Aruntraveller]

Well if it's a personal relationship why would you need a middle man 

All manner of things spring to mind here - all of them fun and filthy.

[King Oberon]

 

[Outrider]

Well if it's a personal relationship why would you need a middle man 

Where there's a middle-man, there's a 'finder's fee'...

O.

[BashfulAnthony]

I don't have a problem  -  it is the likes of you who have the problem, that's why you spend your days denying its existence.

Oh BA your pure comedy gold.. or you would be if you didn't take yourself so seriously (fortunately you are the only one who does!).

So you want me to make the same points again?

OK might as well just cut and paste and hopefully this time you might get someone to read/explain it to you, any 5 year old handy? 

Of course it is BA as your posts frequently infer it's always someone else with the problem 

See that is the pattern of fundies.. they blindly just keep repeating the same things rather than actually questioning themselves and their "beliefs" who knows everyone else might be right and you might be wrong (if you can conceive of such a possibility) 

Sorry to disappoint you but I spend as much time denying the existence of the god of your imagination as I do denying the existence of unicorns and pixies.. none, except of course when I have to put you right on dreams and reality

Again you don't seem to understand BA I spend the same amount of days denying unicorns as I do denying your personal unicorns/gods.

Of course you could make this conversation mute by actually supplying some evidence for either gods or unicorns... your choice 

You see my mentally challenged friend I don't have a problem with peoples personal beliefs unicorns or otherwise so long as they a) don't affect my life and b) you don't try and make out that they in some way a 'fact'.

As I have pointed out faith is faith, unicornist and theists can believe what they want but it doesn't make it real.

Take a leaf out of Gonnagles book and who goes on faith and it's personal to him something I can accept.

In reply to your pig-ignorant and abusive post, I repeat:  you are an anti-theist obsessive, and your lame excuses cannot hide that. But the fact is, you are here, and you sit in some dingy attic ladling out your cheap "rhetoric,"  to no avail.  Can't your little mind see that nobody gives a witch's waddle what you say , or think?  Have a good day.   

[Owlswing]

I don't have a problem  -  it is the likes of you who have the problem, that's why you spend your days denying its existence.

Oh BA your pure comedy gold.. or you would be if you didn't take yourself so seriously (fortunately you are the only one who does!).

So you want me to make the same points again?

OK might as well just cut and paste and hopefully this time you might get someone to read/explain it to you, any 5 year old handy? 

Of course it is BA as your posts frequently infer it's always someone else with the problem 

See that is the pattern of fundies.. they blindly just keep repeating the same things rather than actually questioning themselves and their "beliefs" who knows everyone else might be right and you might be wrong (if you can conceive of such a possibility) 

Sorry to disappoint you but I spend as much time denying the existence of the god of your imagination as I do denying the existence of unicorns and pixies.. none, except of course when I have to put you right on dreams and reality

Again you don't seem to understand BA I spend the same amount of days denying unicorns as I do denying your personal unicorns/gods.

Of course you could make this conversation mute by actually supplying some evidence for either gods or unicorns... your choice 

You see my mentally challenged friend I don't have a problem with peoples personal beliefs unicorns or otherwise so long as they a) don't affect my life and b) you don't try and make out that they in some way a 'fact'.

As I have pointed out faith is faith, unicornist and theists can believe what they want but it doesn't make it real.

Take a leaf out of Gonnagles book and who goes on faith and it's personal to him something I can accept.

In reply to your pig-ignorant and abusive post, I repeat:  you are an anti-theist obsessive, and your lame excuses cannot hide that. But the fact is, you are here, and you sit in some dingy attic ladling out your cheap "rhetoric,"  to no avail.  Can't your little mind see that nobody gives a witch's waddle what you say , or think?  Have a good day.   

WTF is a

witch's waddle

?

[BashfulAnthony]

I don't have a problem  -  it is the likes of you who have the problem, that's why you spend your days denying its existence.

Oh BA your pure comedy gold.. or you would be if you didn't take yourself so seriously (fortunately you are the only one who does!).

So you want me to make the same points again?

OK might as well just cut and paste and hopefully this time you might get someone to read/explain it to you, any 5 year old handy? 

Of course it is BA as your posts frequently infer it's always someone else with the problem 

See that is the pattern of fundies.. they blindly just keep repeating the same things rather than actually questioning themselves and their "beliefs" who knows everyone else might be right and you might be wrong (if you can conceive of such a possibility) 

Sorry to disappoint you but I spend as much time denying the existence of the god of your imagination as I do denying the existence of unicorns and pixies.. none, except of course when I have to put you right on dreams and reality

Again you don't seem to understand BA I spend the same amount of days denying unicorns as I do denying your personal unicorns/gods.

Of course you could make this conversation mute by actually supplying some evidence for either gods or unicorns... your choice 

You see my mentally challenged friend I don't have a problem with peoples personal beliefs unicorns or otherwise so long as they a) don't affect my life and b) you don't try and make out that they in some way a 'fact'.

As I have pointed out faith is faith, unicornist and theists can believe what they want but it doesn't make it real.

Take a leaf out of Gonnagles book and who goes on faith and it's personal to him something I can accept.

In reply to your pig-ignorant and abusive post, I repeat:  you are an anti-theist obsessive, and your lame excuses cannot hide that. But the fact is, you are here, and you sit in some dingy attic ladling out your cheap "rhetoric,"  to no avail.  Can't your little mind see that nobody gives a witch's waddle what you say , or think?  Have a good day.   

WTF is a

witch's waddle

?

Witch's waddle is a saying in these parts, which simply means you don't care.  I have no idea of it's origins.

[Owlswing]

In reply to your pig-ignorant and abusive post, I repeat:  you are an anti-theist obsessive, and your lame excuses cannot hide that. But the fact is, you are here, and you sit in some dingy attic ladling out your cheap "rhetoric,"  to no avail.  Can't your little mind see that nobody gives a witch's waddle what you say , or think?  Have a good day.   

WTF is a

witch's waddle

?

Witch's waddle is a saying in these parts, which simply means you don't care.  I have no idea of it's origins.

You lying sack of shit - it is something you made up in order to create an insult containing the word witch!

"In these parts" - meaning in the parts that you are supposed to use for thinking that have atrophied due to reliance on insult and the bible.

[BashfulAnthony]

In reply to your pig-ignorant and abusive post, I repeat:  you are an anti-theist obsessive, and your lame excuses cannot hide that. But the fact is, you are here, and you sit in some dingy attic ladling out your cheap "rhetoric,"  to no avail.  Can't your little mind see that nobody gives a witch's waddle what you say , or think?  Have a good day.   

WTF is a

witch's waddle

?

Witch's waddle is a saying in these parts, which simply means you don't care.  I have no idea of it's origins.

You lying sack of shit - it is something you made up in order to create an insult containing the word witch!

"In these parts" - meaning in the parts that you are supposed to use for thinking that have atrophied due to reliance on insult and the bible.

I am not lying, and you are a very immature and foul-mouthed old guy.  Go and wash your mouth out with carbolic soap.   


Bible has a capital B, by the way.

[Outrider]

I can't prove that he's lying, of course, but the a quick search of the internet finds no links for the phrase 'Witch's waddle'... just how small are 'these parts', BA?

O.

[BashfulAnthony]

I can't prove that he's lying, of course, but the a quick search of the internet finds no links for the phrase 'Witch's waddle'... just how small are 'these parts', BA?

O.

It is of no particular, consequence.  Actually, I last heard it used on an edition of "Mock the Week," a while back.  End of.

[Owlswing]

In reply to your pig-ignorant and abusive post, I repeat:  you are an anti-theist obsessive, and your lame excuses cannot hide that. But the fact is, you are here, and you sit in some dingy attic ladling out your cheap "rhetoric,"  to no avail.  Can't your little mind see that nobody gives a witch's waddle what you say , or think?  Have a good day.   

WTF is a

witch's waddle

?

Witch's waddle is a saying in these parts, which simply means you don't care.  I have no idea of it's origins.

You lying sack of shit - it is something you made up in order to create an insult containing the word witch!

"In these parts" - meaning in the parts that you are supposed to use for thinking that have atrophied due to reliance on insult and the bible.

I am not lying, and you are a very immature and foul-mouthed old guy.  Go and wash your mouth out with carbolic soap.   


Bible has a capital B, by the way.

To you perhaps, but not to me; to me it is just a words meaning book.

[BashfulAnthony]

In reply to your pig-ignorant and abusive post, I repeat:  you are an anti-theist obsessive, and your lame excuses cannot hide that. But the fact is, you are here, and you sit in some dingy attic ladling out your cheap "rhetoric,"  to no avail.  Can't your little mind see that nobody gives a witch's waddle what you say , or think?  Have a good day.   

WTF is a

witch's waddle

?

Witch's waddle is a saying in these parts, which simply means you don't care.  I have no idea of it's origins.

You lying sack of shit - it is something you made up in order to create an insult containing the word witch!

"In these parts" - meaning in the parts that you are supposed to use for thinking that have atrophied due to reliance on insult and the bible.

I am not lying, and you are a very immature and foul-mouthed old guy.  Go and wash your mouth out with carbolic soap.   


Bible has a capital B, by the way.

To you perhaps, but not to me; to me it is just a words meaning book.

It is not a matter of Christianity and belief, or not.  It is simply a correct use of English.  Bible is a proper noun, and requires a capital B.

[Owlswing]

Bible has a capital B, by the way.

To you perhaps, but not to me; to me it is just a words meaning book.

It is not a matter of Christianity and belief, or not.  It is simply a correct use of English.  Bible is a proper noun, and requires a capital B.

Oxford English Dictionary:

Bible - 1 - the Christian scriptures;
           2 - the Jewish scriptures;
       3 - bible (please note uncapitalised) a book regarded as giving comprehesive and relible information about something e g the electrician's bible

N B - number 3 is everything that number 1 is not; and probably number 2 as well.

[OH MY WORLD!]

Colour is spelled with a u to you and I Matty, but it is not spelled with a u to hundreds of millions.
Writing the Bible has proper rules to follow. And judging form your posts, I would think you would demand that the proper rules be followed.
Or are you one of the sinister that this fella writes about?

http://ezinearticles.com/?Spelling-Bible-With-a-Capital-B&id=3920921

[Owlswing]

Colour is spelled with a u to you and I Matty, but it is not spelled with a u to hundreds of millions.
Writing the Bible has proper rules to follow. And judging form your posts, I would think you would demand that the proper rules be followed.
Or are you one of the sinister that this fella writes about?

http://ezinearticles.com/?Spelling-Bible-With-a-Capital-B&id=3920921

PDNFCFR