If you think about it, your position is no different from me saying that atheism involves its adherents being bigoted, rude, arrogant, liars and childish on the grounds of my having met atheists over the last 60-odd years - both F2F and virtually - who have exhibited 2 or more of these characteristics.
There are undoubtedly some atheists who are unmitigated arseholes, I don't think anyone's denying that. We wouldn't deny that they were atheists, either, just like we don't deny that Stalin or Mao were atheists when that gets thrown at us.
Hitler, though, was a Christian. Torquemada was a Christian. There have, through the ages, been any number of Christian douchebags who have tortured, murdered, enslaved and raped.
I am aware that actions often speak loude than words, but there is also a place for discernment and understanding whether someone's behaviour actually matches the principles they claim to be adhering to.
But the likes of the Westboro' Baptists and the KKK and the American Tea Party and the Christian far-right groups in Europe, and the Nazis all performed and perform their various acts of hatred in spite of, or because of, their professed devotion to Christianity.
Their actions don't match up to the the principles you adhere to, or the principles you think are espoused in the Big Boy's Book of Jewish Bed-Time Stories, but you aren't the arbiter of what's 'true' Christianity and what isn't. In the absence of any reliable information, it's impossible to distinguish with any authority between rival claims, they're all equally uninformed and equally untestable.
Christians are the people that accept the idea that Jesus is divine, and Christianity is the sum of the acts they have done in that understanding, because of that motivation. You might not like that, but that's reality.
O.