I couldn't get all the components for my experiment in my lab. so we will have to work with our imaginations but using the Holy Bible and modern science as our tram-lines to keep us on target.
If you can't test it then your hypothesis remains an hypothesis - that's a valid stage of a scientific process, obviously, but even with the proviso that all scientific claims are provisional that means you can't claim this is a fact - it is at best a possibility, and you still need to work on rephrasing it into an account that would make the test repeatable.
Notice that within our cloud of dark matter we have a huge imploding hole surrounded by masses of this dense material which was now being sucked into this spinning black-hole, filling it and overfilling it, spewing out massless stars, one after the other whilst, simultaneously, massive shock-waves were emanating out from this crash-site which were passing through every other cloud in the universe whipping them up into a spinning frenzy, and, at the same time, blowing them away from the source so that an expanding universes came into being...
Firstly, if you aren't going to bother learning any science, at least learn to use punctuation!
Secondly, whilst there is some evidence to support the idea of black holes, there is no evidence yet to support the notion of dark matter, and certainly no evidence that at any point the two have come into close proximity.
If they were to meet, can you explain by what process you think 'shockwaves' would have been given off, and what medium you think they would have been transmitted through?
and while this was taking place the spinning massless galaxy clouds were turning into spiralling hurricanes, sucking into the eye of their storms, massless solar balls of energy, each one spiralling up their individual hurricane columns before being centrifugally discharged from the rim of this hurricane's storm force out into the surrounding space taking up the form of a spiralling galaxy.
If they were massless, what was constraining them into spirals? At that range electrical forces are negligible, and 'solar balls' (which suggests helium undergoing fusion due to compression because of the gravitational effects of that much mass in one space) suggests gravity and therefore mass.
I cannot think of a better explanation for the universe we see before us today...
I completely believe that. Luckily, other people have come up with much, much more detailed depictions, with the mathematical and evidentiary backing to give us reasonable confidence in their explanations.
and we haven't yet, made a single atom ...
I suggest you go look at what comes out of every single nuclear reactor on the planet, be it fusion or fission.
and it is all possible because the Holy Bible and modern science concur...
No it isn't, because in general they don't, and in the few instances where they do (if you are poetic in your interpretation of the Bible) it's more than reasonable to presume that's more coincidence and the trivialities of poetry than any deeper understanding on the part of the people who made up those stories.
There is a superabundant, invisible, almost undetectable, dynamic energy, out there in the great abyss we call space.
That seems entirely likely. There is every reason to think that would be the case even if the Roman Empire hadn't adopted Christianity as its chosen mythology and instituted the events that led to that particular myth taking hold.
Under very slightly different circumstances you'd be here telling us how clouds of Athena's condensed wisdom fought against the sucking force of the Wells of Hades in the stars to give birth to Gaia.
And that would be unevidenced nonsense as well.
O.
