A Feynman Christmas present

[Nearly Sane]

Enjoy


http://m.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL_6G_2_0gFDqFjq4gZbmDvJT4bnvnNwr-

[Walt Zingmatilder]

Enjoy


http://m.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL_6G_2_0gFDqFjq4gZbmDvJT4bnvnNwr-

He's not on those fucking bongos mumbling about liking orange juice again is he?

[Outrider]

He's not on those fucking bongos mumbling about liking sausages again is he.

Listen to the pot saying "Obviously you follow the New atheist Vlad line that you can be as offensive to the religious Feynman as you like and still be a good guy and have become insensitised to axe grinding." to the kettle...

O.

[Walt Zingmatilder]

Listen to the pot saying "Obviously you follow the New atheist Vlad line that you can be as offensive to the religious Feynman as you like and still be a good guy and have become insensitised to axe grinding." to the kettle...

O.

I've never claimed to be a good guy in the way a new atheist conceives of as a good guy.

I'm sure Feynman would have seen the funny side of my comments.

I'm merely suspicious of the notion that Dr Feynman must be a great bongo player and lyricist if his nuclear physics is anything to go by.

[jeremyp]

He's not on those fucking bongos mumbling about liking orange juice again is he?

You only had to post that link into your browser to find out the answer to that question is "no".

[Walt Zingmatilder]

You only had to post that link into your browser to find out the answer to that question is "no".

Checked it out it is a set of the professors lectures on the laws of physics on the channel of BJ Murphy
..................................................I wonder what the BJ stands for.

[jeremyp]

Enjoy


http://m.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL_6G_2_0gFDqFjq4gZbmDvJT4bnvnNwr-

Thanks for the link. I shall have fun with these.

[jeremyp]

Checked it out it is a set of the professors lectures on the laws of physics on the channel of BJ Murphy
..................................................I wonder what the BJ stands for.

Please stop trying to bring every thread down to your crude smutty ignorant level.

[Maeght]

I've never claimed to be a good guy in the way a new atheist conceives of as a good guy.

And what way is that?

[Walt Zingmatilder]

And what way is that?

Well according to them it's only/mainly religion that makes Good people do bad things.
So since they haven't got religion their inherent saintliness remain unsullied.

Any way here is one the bongos clips where he is delivering his greatest Bongo hit ''I like juice''. It's actually not bad..........................................................

Is that a string theorist accompanying him?

http://www.bing.com/videos/search?q=feynman+bongos+orange+juice&view=detail&mid=ABC2BAD5A8B7C11CB68EABC2BAD5A8B7C11CB68E&FORM=VIRE5

[Maeght]

Well according to them it's only/mainly religion that makes Good people do bad things.
So since they haven't got religion their inherent saintliness remain unsullied.

I think that's your filter coming into play again. Some atheists do say that religion can lead to bad things happening but I don't think anyone claims it is the only or main cause of bad things. Never seen any claims for saintliness either.

[Walt Zingmatilder]

I think that's your filter coming into play again. Some atheists do say that religion can lead to bad things happening but I don't think anyone claims it is the only or main cause of bad things. Never seen any claims for saintliness either.

The root of all evil? written and presented by Richard Dawkins on channel 4.

[Shaker]

The root of all evil? written and presented by Richard Dawkins on channel 4.

What about it?

[Maeght]

The root of all evil? written and presented by Richard Dawkins on channel 4.

According to Dawkins, a title which he didn't want to use but which Channel 4 insisted on in order to create controversy and raise awareness of the program. Also worth noting that the title has a question mark at the end of it.

[Shaker]

According to Dawkins, a title which he didn't want to use but which Channel 4 insisted on in order to create controversy and raise awareness of the program. Also worth noting that the title has a question mark at the end of it.

Also worth noting that in discussing the title foisted upon the programme Dawkins remarked on how absurd it is to regard any one specific thing as the cause of all evil.

Guess Vlad hadn't heard of that, otherwise I'm sure he would have said.

[Walt Zingmatilder]

Also worth noting that in discussing the title foisted upon the programme Dawkins remarked on how absurd it is to regard any one specific thing as the cause of all evil.

Guess Vlad hadn't heard of that, otherwise I'm sure he would have said.

No I had heard that suggested.The good Dawkter having had the same difficulty with other of his titles apparently...............

The programme was reissued as the God Delusion........fits in with the franchise I suppose.

Apparently the prog was heavily edited to give it a certain feel and non extreme religionists edited out which maintained the panto villain image of those who remained.

[Shaker]

No I had heard that suggested.The good Dawkter having had the same difficulty with other of his titles apparently...............

Haven't heard of that. Which ones?

Apparently the prog was heavily edited to give it a certain feel and non extreme religionists edited out which maintained the panto villain image of those who remained.

News to me. Programmes are edited because generally far more material is compiled than can be broadcast (although usually it appears on DVD releases as is the case here) so the rough cut has to be trimmed down to fit into a particular TV format, taking ad breaks into account on commercial television (30 minutes/60 minutes/90 minutes etc.).

[jeremyp]

Apparently the prog was heavily edited to give it a certain feel and non extreme religionists edited out

Didn't he interview a C of E bishop?

Vlad lies again.

[Maeght]

Apparently the prog was heavily edited to give it a certain feel and non extreme religionists edited out which maintained the panto villain image of those who remained.

If so it was done by Channel 4 for the same reasons I would think.

[Walt Zingmatilder]

Didn't he interview a C of E bishop?

Vlad lies again.

Three fundementalists    Alister McGrath on the cutting room floor. Criticism of the cuts led to release of an Uncut version on DVD.

[Walt Zingmatilder]

Didn't he interview a C of E bishop?

Vlad lies again.

Don't forget the subsequent critique of Dawkin's bias representation of religion.

[Shaker]

Three fundementalists    Alister McGrath on the cutting room floor. Criticism of the cuts led to release of an Uncut version on DVD.

I wouldn't have thought of Richard Harries as a fundamentalist - seems a kindly old stick to me. But each to their own.

The cutting room floor is too good for the likes of Alister "Hm, yes, but therefore in a very real, if you will, sense, so to speak as it were" McGrath.

[Shaker]

Don't forget the subsequent critique of Dawkin's bias representation of religion.

Examples?

[Walt Zingmatilder]

Examples?

I'm not sure what you want me to provide here,reviews of The God Delusion since the film became the fil of the book and was renamed which criticise Dawkins for taking a singular view largely based on fundementalists? or criticism of his view that religion has not done anything good of significance and is mainly bad?

[Maeght]

I'm not sure what you want me to provide here,reviews of The God Delusion since the film became the fil of the book and was renamed which criticise Dawkins for taking a singular view largely based on fundementalists? or criticism of his view that religion has not done anything good of significance and is mainly bad?

You said not to forget the subsequent critigue so surely you know what you were referring to.