Was Jesus gay?

[OH MY WORLD!]

Floo,
If you believe that about Sass, then you must have the evidence? It would be helpful to read, perhaps she has forgotten. Like you forgot what you wrote, remember that? You blew a fuse but in the end you had to admit to writing what you denied writing.

[Brownie]

I believe Sass has suggested for quite a while that the moon landings didn't take place. No doubt she will clarify her thinking, if that word can be used where her posts are concerned!

Not only Sass believes the moon landings didn't happen.  At one time there was a lot written about the sophisticated government hoax, I've forgotten most of it, and a film was made (a drama) that clearly showed how it could be done.  I'm not saying Sass is correct about this, I honestly neither know nor care, but it is possible and she is in very good company thinking such.

[Hope]

Floo,
If you believe that about Sass, then you must have the evidence? It would be helpful to read, perhaps she has forgotten. Like you forgot what you wrote, remember that? You blew a fuse but in the end you had to admit to writing what you denied writing.

OMW, Sass has often stated that she doesn't believe that the moon-landings ever happened.  As Brownie has pointed out, she wouldn't be the only person to believe this.  There are many respected people who have suggested this.  I've heard this idea being described as a 'respectable conspiracy theory'.

[Shaker]

OMW, Sass has often stated that she doesn't believe that the moon-landings ever happened.  As Brownie has pointed out, she wouldn't be the only person to believe this.

That's the ubiquity of stupidity for you.

There are many respected people who have suggested this. I've heard this idea being described as a 'respectable conspiracy theory'.

Anybody who believes such arrant tosh doesn't deserve to be regarded as respected; if they believe themselves to be so, they are delusional.

[Hope]

That's the ubiquity of stupidity for you.

Anybody who believes such arrant tosh doesn't deserve to be regarded as respected; if they believe themselves to be so, they are delusional.

I'd advise you not to be too rude about those who regard the events of 1969 as made up - there are a number of eminent folk amongst them - and some of the evidence they produce has yet to be debunked.  I don't happen to agree with their arguments, but they aren't delusional, as you like to insist.

[BeRational]

I'd advise you not to be too rude about those who regard the events of 1969 as made up - there are a number of eminent folk amongst them - and some of the evidence they produce has yet to be debunked.  I don't happen to agree with their arguments, but they aren't delusional, as you like to insist.

It has ALL been debunked!
There are no reputable people that doubt the moon landings.
Anyone that does is a raving nutcase.

Don't ask Buzz if he walked on the moon, you might get a punch for being such an idiot.

[Hope]

Don't ask Buzz if he walked on the moon, you might get a punch for being such an idiot.

Having spoken to Buzz once, F2F, I have no problem with his position.  As I say, it is the conspracy theorists' position I have problems with, but that doesn't mean that one can't acknowledge that there are some of their views which aren't as clear-cut as some here and within NASA would like people to believe.

[Shaker]

I'd advise you not to be too rude about those who regard the events of 1969 as made up - there are a number of eminent folk amongst them - and some of the evidence they produce has yet to be debunked.  I don't happen to agree with their arguments, but they aren't delusional, as you like to insist.

Of course they are.

Utter fruitloop dingbat delusional poopy heads. Without exception.

That you seem to think otherwise is no great revelation, however. It's all part of the same syndrome, undoubtedly.

Exactly who are these supposedly eminent folk you've alluded to? Seems like you forgot to say. What are their so far unrefuted points about the supposedly fake moon landings? You forgot to mention that too.

The testimony of the hundreds of thousands (possibly millions overall?) of people involved in the space programme - the specimens of moon rock brought back - the tracking of moon-bound craft by Russians and many others - the retroreflectors left on the moon's surface by which we know the moon is  creeping away from us at around 3.8cm per year - I'd love to know what lunatic fantasies your "eminent folk" have concocted to deny the reality of these and so many, many other points.

[BeRational]

Having spoken to Buzz once, F2F, I have no problem with his position.  As I say, it is the conspracy theorists' position I have problems with, but that doesn't mean that one can't acknowledge that there are some of their views which aren't as clear-cut as some here and within NASA would like people to believe.

It is clear cut, and if you do not believe the moon landings happened you are a fruit loop.

[Sassy]

Yes indeed - gravity on the moon is one sixth than that of the Earth. You've already been told this.

One-sixth of Earth's gravity however does not mean that astronauts on the surface would float away into space without weighted suits, as per your claim

Do you know what makes you so insincere?  The fact that having posted with you for years, you already know we have discussed the moon, earth and gravity before. What is it, Shaker.... trying to pretend you did not know I know about such things?
Shame on you.

[Sassy]

Sassy:  "Just as  homosexuality is for homosexuals, Christianity is for Christians and each must choose their own paths."

What about Christian homosexuals Sass?  There are quite a few.

Anyone born of the Spirit and Truth cannot be homosexual.
]

[Sebastian Toe]

Do you know what makes you so insincere?  The fact that having posted with you for years, you already know we have discussed the moon, earth and gravity before. What is it, Shaker.... trying to pretend you did not know I know about such things?
Shame on you.

Perhaps it would help clarify your knowledge of gravity if you expanded on or explained further this statement that you made earlier.

Gravity for instance.... We see the affect of gravity but no one understands why it is here and not on every planet in our solar system.

The way it reads to nearly everyone here is what is causing the confusion/queries.

[Shaker]

Do you know what makes you so insincere?  The fact that having posted with you for years, you already know we have discussed the moon, earth and gravity before.

That's news to me.

What is it, Shaker.... trying to pretend you did not know I know about such things?
Shame on you.

I'm basing your ignorance of these things on your statements, made within the past few days, that there is no gravity on any planet other than Earth and that without weighted spacesuits men on the moon would simply have floated off into space. Only someone massively, profoundly, insanely deluded about the most basic workings of nature would make such comments (and do so in public).

Your posts are semi-literate and incoherent babble at the best of times, which is why for the most part I ignore them, but I hadn't come across quite that nadir of jaw-dropping stupidity before.

[Leonard James]

Your posts are semi-literate and incoherent babble at the best of times, which is why for the most part I ignore them, but I hadn't come across quite that nadir of jaw-dropping stupidity before.

Quite! Sass's stupidity is at times irresistible, no matter how often we vow to ignore her.   

[floo]

Anyone born of the Spirit and Truth cannot be homosexual.
]

That is a really STUPID comment Sass, even for you!

[Brownie]

Anyone born of the Spirit and Truth cannot be homosexual.
]

This is one area in which you and I part company Sass.  We must agree to differ.

[OH MY WORLD!]

I didn't say, she didn't write it. I just want to read it. (Sass, no moon landing thingy).

And Shaker, some of your PooPourii is needed. Don't look down your beak at Sass. You believe in Klingons (ETs) and have no proof. You do have faith though.

Speaking of Shakers Klingon's, What does toilet paper and the Starship Enterprise have in common? They both circle Ur anus looking for Klingons.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z9xWYApbd6Y

[Shaker]

And Shaker, some of your PooPourii is needed. Don't look down your beak at Sass. You believe in Klingons (ETs) and have no proof. You do have faith though.

Feel free to link to the posts where I've said that.

Best of luck.

[Brownie]

Why can people not exercise a little compassion here instead of piling on the heads, en masse, of their fellow posters?

[OH MY WORLD!]

Shaker,
Being that you're so anal. You didn't use such words, but you believe there are probably inhabited planets out there. And you require no ETs to have faith that they might be there, yet telling us there is no God and demanding evidence for His existence. And when given the opportunity you mock Sass for not believing a moon walk thingy.

Now wobble outside and enjoy some sunshine, don't just sit there and gobble down another bowl of boiled lentils.

A Klingon challenges a Shaker

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OKQDRxs5Nzk

[Shaker]

Shaker,
Being that you're so anal. You didn't use such words

Well spotted. I didn't

but you believe there are probably inhabited planets out there. And you require no ETs to have faith that they might be there

First of all "inhabited" implies complex intelligent life, which is going to be rare. Secondly, I have no belief in such planets because there's no evidence for them (though of course, by definition, if there were evidence of them there'd be no need for faith in them - it would be a matter of knowledge). Thirdly, my attitude toward extraterrestrial life is based upon a rational appraisal of the possibilities which is in itself based upon hard science across several disciplines.

yet telling us there is no God and demanding evidence for His existence.

It's not tremendously difficult to produce a clear, comprehensive and definitive set of criteria for the discovery of extraterrestrial life - that's to say, we know what it would mean to find such life - we would know it if we saw it and we would know how we know.

When you can say the same of any gods, get back to me.

And when given the opportunity you mock Sass for not believing a moon walk thingy.

Yes indeed. That's because anybody who believes in a moon landing conspiracy (i.e. that it never happened, and has been kept secret by potentially millions of people all over the world for nearly half a century) is a delusional asshat.

[Leonard James]

Why can people not exercise a little compassion here instead of piling on the heads, en masse, of their fellow posters?

You have no idea how much we hold back at times. That IS compassion.

[Shaker]

You have no idea how much we hold back at times. That IS compassion.

That

[floo]

You have no idea how much we hold back at times. That IS compassion.

I agree!

There are many times I want to let fly and tell certain posters exactly what I think of them, in terms which would probably get me banned for life! I polish my halo at the end of each day when I congratulate myself on how restrained I have been. I fear that one day I will really lose it with one poster in particular, some days I get very close to doing so!

[Sassy]

Perhaps it would help clarify your knowledge of gravity if you expanded on or explained further this statement that you made earlier.
 

The way it reads to nearly everyone here is what is causing the confusion/queries.

Sometimes we take for granted that everyone knows that the gravity on planet earth is different from that through our solar system.  I personally believe God is the force which keeps all the other forces in place.
The sun and moon brings life to our planet. Especially the sun it affects us and lives in that without it, we would all die.
The moon affecting the tidal flows. But we are kept spinning on our axis, rotating around the sun. Without the sun nothing would exist on earth.  However, without God and his power none would remain where they are.