Author Topic: More US election stuff  (Read 72515 times)

Jack Knave

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8690
Re: More US election stuff
« Reply #200 on: August 13, 2016, 03:32:57 PM »
It's a bit late for that now, they have nominated him.
You think politics is a game that plays fair?  :o

Jack Knave

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8690
Re: More US election stuff
« Reply #201 on: August 13, 2016, 03:39:16 PM »
That, "The Second Amendment people have tremendous power because they are so united,” which he told a CBS affiliate in North Carolina late on Tuesday.
One guy on Dateline claims that the NRA have paid for many of Trumps ad commercials, which would explain his comments.

Jack Knave

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8690
Re: More US election stuff
« Reply #202 on: August 13, 2016, 03:55:29 PM »
Because they are a well organised group and to be fair, they have used democratic means in the past to make their case.

https://www.quora.com/Why-is-the-NRA-so-effective-at-lobbying
Someone on Dateline was implying that his comments here were in reference to Clinton being in power, plus the democrats being in control of the Senate and HoR, and then from there she bringing in her judges, all leading to gun rights being watered down.......and then what happens next is...

Jack Knave

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8690
Re: More US election stuff
« Reply #203 on: August 13, 2016, 04:08:20 PM »
Listening to Lionel Shriver, novelist, being interviewed on the BBC she mentioned that if Trump was concocted as a fictitious character the readers wouldn't buy it. He wouldn't be accepted as plausible. That's how crazy the situation is!!!

Hope

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 25569
    • Tools With A Mission
Re: More US election stuff
« Reply #204 on: August 13, 2016, 06:08:31 PM »
...and then what happens next is...
... that fewer American citizens die at the hands (or firearms) of foeelow American citizens.  However, I doubt whether Clinton would change any of the gun laws.  The NRA have too many Congressmen and women, not to mention Senators (regardless of party in both cases), in their thrall.
Are your, or your friends'/relatives', garages, lofts or sheds full of unused DIY gear, sewing/knitting machines or fabric and haberdashery stuff?

Lists of what is needed and a search engine to find your nearest collector (scroll to bottom for latter) are here:  http://www.twam.uk/donate-tools

jeremyp

  • Admin Support
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 32495
  • Blurb
    • Sincere Flattery: A blog about computing
Re: More US election stuff
« Reply #205 on: August 14, 2016, 09:51:48 AM »
Because they are a well organised group and to be fair, they have used democratic means in the past to make their case.

https://www.quora.com/Why-is-the-NRA-so-effective-at-lobbying
Well why be coy about it then?
This post and all of JeremyP's posts words certified 100% divinely inspired* -- signed God.
*Platinum infallibility package, terms and conditions may apply

Hope

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 25569
    • Tools With A Mission
Re: More US election stuff
« Reply #206 on: August 14, 2016, 03:25:32 PM »
Because they are a well organised group and to be fair, they have used democratic means in the past to make their case.

https://www.quora.com/Why-is-the-NRA-so-effective-at-lobbying
Not sure that handing out money to pay campaign costs, etc. is necessarily the best example of 'democratic means', LA.
Are your, or your friends'/relatives', garages, lofts or sheds full of unused DIY gear, sewing/knitting machines or fabric and haberdashery stuff?

Lists of what is needed and a search engine to find your nearest collector (scroll to bottom for latter) are here:  http://www.twam.uk/donate-tools

Jack Knave

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8690
Re: More US election stuff
« Reply #207 on: August 14, 2016, 04:19:11 PM »
... that fewer American citizens die at the hands (or firearms) of foeelow American citizens.  However, I doubt whether Clinton would change any of the gun laws.  The NRA have too many Congressmen and women, not to mention Senators (regardless of party in both cases), in their thrall.
That last bit was meant to indicate what Trump had 'implied', the assignation of Clinton.

jeremyp

  • Admin Support
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 32495
  • Blurb
    • Sincere Flattery: A blog about computing
Re: More US election stuff
« Reply #208 on: August 15, 2016, 01:00:57 PM »
Hillary Clinton now at 89.2% chance of winning.

http://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/2016-election-forecast/?ex_cid=rrpromo

We are probably past the point where the Republicans can replace their candidate without incurring election losing penalties, at least not without court action.
This post and all of JeremyP's posts words certified 100% divinely inspired* -- signed God.
*Platinum infallibility package, terms and conditions may apply

L.A.

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5278
    • Radcliffe U3A
Re: More US election stuff
« Reply #209 on: August 15, 2016, 10:05:44 PM »
Not sure that handing out money to pay campaign costs, etc. is necessarily the best example of 'democratic means', LA.

It's the American way Hope.
Brexit Bar:

Full of nuts but with lots of flakey bits and a bitter aftertaste

L.A.

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5278
    • Radcliffe U3A
Re: More US election stuff
« Reply #210 on: August 15, 2016, 10:08:20 PM »
Hillary Clinton now at 89.2% chance of winning.

http://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/2016-election-forecast/?ex_cid=rrpromo

We are probably past the point where the Republicans can replace their candidate without incurring election losing penalties, at least not without court action.

I very much hope you are right but betting odds are not the same as probability and there is still plenty of time for unexpected events.
Brexit Bar:

Full of nuts but with lots of flakey bits and a bitter aftertaste

jeremyp

  • Admin Support
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 32495
  • Blurb
    • Sincere Flattery: A blog about computing
Re: More US election stuff
« Reply #211 on: August 16, 2016, 09:57:34 AM »
I very much hope you are right but betting odds are not the same as probability and there is still plenty of time for unexpected events.
Check the site. These are not betting odds, they are probabilities arrived at by simulating the election 20,000 times using the latest polling and other data. In fact, it's Nate Silver's site.
This post and all of JeremyP's posts words certified 100% divinely inspired* -- signed God.
*Platinum infallibility package, terms and conditions may apply

jeremyp

  • Admin Support
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 32495
  • Blurb
    • Sincere Flattery: A blog about computing
Re: More US election stuff
« Reply #212 on: September 07, 2016, 03:02:31 PM »
Hilary down to a 67.8% chance of winning.

This is beginning to get worrying.
This post and all of JeremyP's posts words certified 100% divinely inspired* -- signed God.
*Platinum infallibility package, terms and conditions may apply

L.A.

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5278
    • Radcliffe U3A
Re: More US election stuff
« Reply #213 on: September 13, 2016, 08:35:22 AM »
Hilary down to a 67.8% chance of winning.

This is beginning to get worrying.

What did I say about unexpected events? :)
Brexit Bar:

Full of nuts but with lots of flakey bits and a bitter aftertaste

Jack Knave

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8690
Re: More US election stuff
« Reply #214 on: September 13, 2016, 04:48:41 PM »
What did I say about unexpected events? :)
I don't think Hilary's health will last the coarse. Every little cough and splut will be scrutinised now. With the riggers of being President, assuming she wins, she is bound to 'fall' at some point.

jeremyp

  • Admin Support
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 32495
  • Blurb
    • Sincere Flattery: A blog about computing
Re: More US election stuff
« Reply #215 on: September 15, 2016, 07:49:45 PM »
I don't think Hilary's health will last the coarse. Every little cough and splut will be scrutinised now. With the riggers of being President, assuming she wins, she is bound to 'fall' at some point.
She had a bout of pneumonia, that's all. I have a friend who caught pneumonia in college. She's still perfectly fit 30 years later.
This post and all of JeremyP's posts words certified 100% divinely inspired* -- signed God.
*Platinum infallibility package, terms and conditions may apply

Jack Knave

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8690
Re: More US election stuff
« Reply #216 on: September 15, 2016, 08:32:19 PM »
She had a bout of pneumonia, that's all. I have a friend who caught pneumonia in college. She's still perfectly fit 30 years later.
There's no guarantees in life and she is 69 years old. 

Nearly Sane

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 64323
Re: More US election stuff
« Reply #217 on: September 15, 2016, 11:52:44 PM »
There's no guarantees in life and she is 69 years old.
the first is an irrelevant truism, the second is factually wrong by a year. The whole sentence seems a tad vacuous - what's your point, caller?

jeremyp

  • Admin Support
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 32495
  • Blurb
    • Sincere Flattery: A blog about computing
Re: More US election stuff
« Reply #218 on: September 16, 2016, 01:37:11 AM »
There's no guarantees in life and she is 69 years old.
Donald Trump is 70.
This post and all of JeremyP's posts words certified 100% divinely inspired* -- signed God.
*Platinum infallibility package, terms and conditions may apply

BashfulAnthony

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7520
Re: More US election stuff
« Reply #219 on: September 16, 2016, 10:53:16 AM »

Pneumonia is a very serious condition, particularly in the elderly, and I am only too aware of that through recent events in my family.  To think of my particular family member in question beginning a job as physically, and mentally, demanding as the US President is a non-starter:  he is 71, by the way.
BA.

Jesus said to him, “I am the way, and the truth, and the life.

It is my commandment that you love one another."

floo

  • Guest
Re: More US election stuff
« Reply #220 on: September 16, 2016, 11:19:51 AM »
I think being President, especially these days, is a job for someone in their 40s or early 50s. Whilst Clinton is a million times more preferable than Trump, she is still over the hill, imo.

Jack Knave

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8690
Re: More US election stuff
« Reply #221 on: September 16, 2016, 05:45:24 PM »
the first is an irrelevant truism, the second is factually wrong by a year. The whole sentence seems a tad vacuous
OK, she's 68, but in my defence she looks 69, probably because she is ill.  ;D

It is only vacuous to those who are vacuous!!!
« Last Edit: September 16, 2016, 05:53:13 PM by Jack Knave »

Nearly Sane

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 64323
Re: More US election stuff
« Reply #222 on: September 16, 2016, 05:47:18 PM »
OK, she's 68, but in my defence she looks 69.  ;D

It is only vacuous to those who are vacuous!!!
was that in the other fortune cookie?

Jack Knave

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8690
Re: More US election stuff
« Reply #223 on: September 16, 2016, 05:50:00 PM »
Donald Trump is 70.
I know but we were talking about Hilary and whereas he's pretty fit for his age she's coughing and spluttering and near death's door. Her vice President is the grim Reaper!

Nearly Sane

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 64323
Re: More US election stuff
« Reply #224 on: September 16, 2016, 05:51:40 PM »
I know but we were talking about Hilary and whereas he's pretty fit for his age she's coughing and spluttering and near death's door. Her vice President is the grim Reaper!
and where did you get your M.D.?