If the god of the Bible meant for his message to be understood then that same evidence suggests he's failed.
Otherwise we wouldn't have so many different Christian denominations and sects each claiming to be right at the expense of the others.
Then of course, we have the mixed messages in the Bible itself - sure there are good things in there but it's not short of primitive barbarisms either.
Nietzsche questioned the goodness of an omniscient, omnipotent god who doesn't even make sure that his creatures understand his intention. This god who allows doubts to persist for thousands of years. Nietzsche went on to liken the god of the Bible to a deaf man making all kinds of ambiguous signs and gestures when some sort of danger is present.
I hear that Jesus Christ is the son of the supreme cosmic mega being and he was sent to suffer and die in some sort of weird sado-masochistic manner in order for the cosmic mega being to forgive us.
The communication is so poor that we have to take on trust a miraculous event that was supposedly witnessed by hundreds if not thousands of people that included cameos by prophets like Elijah and Moses went unrecorded. Virtually no historical documentation whatsoever, not a single scrap of papyrus, no drawings on buildings by the faithful, nothing.
And we are apparently wagering an eternity in paradise or hell on this poor communication because the benevolent deity that chose to broadcast his message so obliquely will be angry at us if we conclude that the story is an embellishment or a fabrication since it should be abundantly clear that it is in fact, a fact.
Poor communication indeed.
The very fact that "belief" is demanded as a means of "salvation" is itself a clue that what is really going on here is psychology of the same form that is used by chain letters to propagate themselves. Also true to form as in all good chain letters there are also the dire threats of ignoring the 'offer'.
Denominations are really the same thing but with different emphases.
Sects I move don't have a set of doctrines which consistently back up the Trinitarian premise.
The notion that all denominations are saying the others are wrong is exaggerated and often downright wrong itself.
Sects bowdlerise scripture in much the same way as an antitheist does.
The bible does have mixed messages since it is a collection of books and comes in many genres and points of view.
Talk of a supreme mega being is a bit passe isn't it......HHGTTG went out with flared trousers didn't it. Declaring Douglas Adams 'hip' is a bit like Cliff Richard representing Christian youth until well into his forties.
We all know God's intention is for us to encounter him........I'm afraid antitheists come across as fleeing from that eventuality.