Exactly - although IME reading widely around a subject can introduce you to points or arguments you'd never thought of before.
Which might well explain why I find the argument put forward by folk like yourself, Shakes, to be so limiting. For instance, it doesn't take many pages of reading books like Ehrman's 'How Jesus Became God' or 'Lost Christianities' to see flaws in his arguments; or books by the likes of Grayling, Hitchens or Dawkins to see inconsistencies in
their arguments. As I've mentioned before, although I was brought up ina Christian family, I didn't become a Christian until I was nigh-on 18. The school library was full of philosophical and other material that I read quite avidly. It was as I understood the emptiness of so much that I turned 'back', first to Hinduism and Buddhism and then to Christianity.