The 'Truth'

[BeRational]

You ask me a question on Psalm 14 I answered Yes what is it about the word yes you have a problem with.

Since then you have not ask me anything.
~TW~

I have asked you why YOU believe in a god or gods in your own words.

You know this and keep running away from it.

Can you answer?

[BeRational]

so you have about 5 minutes left to get your questions in then I must go elsewhere. 
~TW~

I keep repeating the question, and all you can do is lie that you do not know you have been asked a question.

That is low, even for you.

[Stranger]

so you have about 5 minutes left to get your questions in then I must go elsewhere. 
~TW~

Still waiting for you to produce any smidgen of evidence or hint of a rational argument for your god.

Note: attempting to cast doubt on science is not an argument for your god.

I'll not hold my breath...

[~TW~]

I keep repeating the question, and all you can do is lie that you do not know you have been asked a question.

That is low, even for you.

Your problem is English and reading and not accepting answers this answer should satisfy you      ------------ John 14:16–17 (NIV)
16 And I will ask the Father, and he will give you another advocate to help you and be with you forever—17 the Spirit of truth. The world cannot accept him, because it neither sees him nor knows him. But you know him, for he lives with you and will be in you.   -------------- but it is to easy for you to understand and you are also a worldling.
~TW~

[~TW~]

 ;)I'll not hold my breath...

 Do it then you will have all the evidence.    time to go.
~TW~

[Stranger]

;)I'll not hold my breath...

 Do it then you will have all the evidence.    time to go.
~TW~

        Running away again.....

[Stranger]

Your problem is English and reading and not accepting answers this answer should satisfy you      ------------ John 14:16–17 (NIV)
16 And I will ask the Father, and he will give you another advocate to help you and be with you forever—17 the Spirit of truth. The world cannot accept him, because it neither sees him nor knows him. But you know him, for he lives with you and will be in you.   -------------- but it is to easy for you to understand and you are also a worldling.
~TW~

So, some old book tells you that you are special because you have this invisible friend that other people won't accept.

Well okay then, if you put it like that, I'm totally convinced by this stunning evidence and inescapable reasoning.

 

[~TW~]

So, some old book tells you that you are special because you have this invisible friend that other people won't accept.

Well okay then, if you put it like that, I'm totally convinced by this stunning evidence and inescapable reasoning.

 

       well at last you see.
~TW~

[Stranger]

       well at last you see.
~TW~

 

[Khatru]

You ask me a question on Psalm 14 I answered Yes what is it about the word yes you have a problem with.

As you well know, Imwanted to establish whether or not you agreed with the scriptural lie.

Since then you have not ask me anything.
~TW~

Wrong.  Having established that you believed the lie, I then went on to challenge you by asking for evidence.

Of course, I wouldn't ask you to do something I wasn't prepared to do myself, so I did provide evidence.

You, on the other hand, not only failed to provide evidence but your beliefs were so frail that you couldn't even negin to provide an answer.

[BeRational]

Your problem is English and reading and not accepting answers this answer should satisfy you      ------------ John 14:16–17 (NIV)
16 And I will ask the Father, and he will give you another advocate to help you and be with you forever—17 the Spirit of truth. The world cannot accept him, because it neither sees him nor knows him. But you know him, for he lives with you and will be in you.   -------------- but it is to easy for you to understand and you are also a worldling.
~TW~

This is not an answer to the question as all you are doing is quoting an old book.

Is you answer you believe in a god because an old book says god exists?

Is that your answer?

[~TW~]

As you well know, Imwanted to establish whether or not you agreed with the scriptural lie.

Wrong.  Having established that you believed the lie, I then went on to challenge you by asking for evidence.

Of course, I wouldn't ask you to do something I wasn't prepared to do myself, so I did provide evidence.

You, on the other hand, not only failed to provide evidence but your beliefs were so frail that you couldn't even negin to provide an answer.

 I answered the question you should have ask for my views as to why I said yes and not evidence.
You need to try and sharpen up.Are you related to floo
~TW~

[~TW~]

This is not an answer to the question as all you are doing is quoting an old book.

Is you answer you believe in a god because an old book says god exists?

Is that your answer?

Are you thick or just plain daft,the answer is correct the book is correct because I have had a personal experience of what the old book says.I am not asking you to believe that ,I could not care less go back to sleep get some rest.
~TW~

[BeRational]

Are you thick or just plain daft,the answer is correct the book is correct because I have had a personal experience of what the old book says.I am not asking you to believe that ,I could not care less go back to sleep get some rest.
~TW~

I think it's quite obvious who is intellectually challenged!

So, your answer to the question why YOU believe in a god, is that an old book says a god exists?

So, if I find someone who believes in a different god, from a different old book, and that person has had personal experiences of that different god, what then?

[~TW~]

I think it's quite obvious who is intellectually challenged!

So, your answer to the question why YOU believe in a god, is that an old book says a god exists?

So, if I find someone who believes in a different god, from a different old book, and that person has had personal experiences of that different god, what then?

Go away you know what I think of you play with your dolly.
~TW~

[Stranger]

Go away you know what I think of you play with your dolly.

Bluster and insult is actually all you can manage, isn't it? No chance of you actually thinking, it would seem.

[BeRational]

Go away you know what I think of you play with your dolly.
~TW~

And you call people thick!

When you are scared of questions, and their consequence, all you can do is bluster.

You must know that your beliefs are delusional and easily defeated with a little honest scrutiny, and that is why you react the way you do.

[~TW~]

And you call people thick!

When you are scared of questions, and their consequence, all you can do is bluster.

You must know that your beliefs are delusional and easily defeated with a little honest scrutiny, and that is why you react the way you do.

Look read this slowly and take it in you are the complete nutter you ask questions get an answer and then like a bad case of indigestion you come back with the same shit so sod off.
~TW~

[Gordon]

Moderator:

TW

Could we have less of the very obvious personal insults please.

I'm reluctant to close down a lively discussion, but retaliating in this way is generating more heat than light, which rarely leads to anything productive.

[BeRational]

Look read this slowly and take it in you are the complete nutter you ask questions get an answer and then like a bad case of indigestion you come back with the same shit so sod off.
~TW~

Your answer was not clear, and I am asking for clarification.

Do you believe in a god, simply because and old book says a god exists?

Yes or No.

[Khatru]

 I answered the question you should have ask for my views as to why I said yes and not evidence.
You need to try and sharpen up.Are you related to floo
~TW~

Calm down.

Try muttering at the ceiling light - I've heard you guys like doing that.

You don't have views other than those inane ramblings of some late Iron Age goat herders.  I've heard them before.

I asked for evidence and you failed to deliver.

[~TW~]

Calm down.

Try muttering at the ceiling light - I've heard you guys like doing that.

You don't have views other than those inane ramblings of some late Iron Age goat herders.  I've heard them before.

I asked for evidence and you failed to deliver.

So we ignore the clown prince and I give you one chance to put your question up,
Waiting.
~TW~

[Shaker]

I have a question I'd like to direct at ~TW~. In fact two:

Given the difference between an open system and a closed system in the realm of physics, evidence of which as presented by me in the link in #359, do you (1) now understand the difference between the two and (2) now understand why the creationist so-called argument against evolution as presented by you in #347, #348 and #350 (for some reason) is based on a completely hopeless misunderstanding of the second law of thermodynamics and is therefore an utter failure?

[~TW~]

I have a question I'd like to direct at ~TW~. In fact two:

Given the difference between an open system and a closed system in the realm of physics, evidence of which as presented by me in the link in #359, do you (1) now understand the difference between the two and (2) now understand why the creationist so-called argument against evolution as presented by you in #347, #348 and #350 (for some reason) is based on a completely hopeless misunderstanding of the second law of thermodynamics and is therefore an utter failure?

So your post is right and mine is wrong all you have got to do is point me to something that does not wear out,waiting.
~TW~

[~TW~]

http://www.icr.org/article/evolution-thermodynamics-entropy/
~TW~