Sassy, you are so gloriously free of any hint of reasoning or logic - I know it's pointless trying to tell you but here we go, for a laugh...
You have to show that Christ words are basic logical fallacies or shut up.
Please try to concentrate. It is
your words that form fallacies, sassy. I didn't mention this Christ character's words.
You see Stranger the facts are we exist and in this world no matter what scientist do they cannot create life forms we already have from any of the things/cells elsewhere on the planet. No evolution because we never change. We have had Elephants for thousands of years and they still look the same. We have different breeds of Elephants and some died out.
Same with all the animals but we never and never will find anything new by way of creature evolving.
THINK... Man has never changed for thousands of years. If crops did not exist and fruit trees/bushes we would have died.
The first man and woman had to be created. illogical to believe a bunch of cells which don't exist now created a man and woman from nothing on this planet.
If I've untangled this incoherent rant correctly, it's an
argument from incredulity fallacy aimed at the theory of evolution (with a large helping of ignorance of said theory, thrown in for good measure).
Give the above, we see that it is not a fallacy....
Unfortunately you didn't even attempt to address the "PROVE GOD DOES NOT EXIST"
argument from ignorance fallacy, you just added an
argument from incredulity fallacy.
Because there is nothing else that would explain our existence.
This is just a different form of
argument from ignorance. Even if it were true that we could think of no other explanation - that isn't actually and argument for one somebody made up without any evidence or arguments that positively support it. That's before we get to the fact that there are scientific theories, replete with evidence, for many aspects of how we came to be. There are also many, many other religious 'explanations' apart from your own favourite.
Additionally, of course, you have to face the fact that god doesn't actually
explain anything because it
could 'explain' anything. It is a conjecture without predictions; an unfalsifiable 'just so' story.
You are deceiving yourself and fooling only yourself if that is what you think you can compare belief in God to.
It is clear that you are the men who sold the emperor his new clothes. You think you can trick people into believing something
totally illogical. Instead of using the pride and ignorance of others to deceive them, you are simply deceiving yourself.
Lack of honesty is why you write the above.
By a staggering coincidence, that is pretty much my reaction to your stories about your god.
Pride as well, because the truth is you have no logical reason for not believing in God you would rather dishonestly pretend a logical fallacy exist. Because so and so said it.
I suggest you try to address the fallacies I have pointed out instead of adding to them and ranting. Perhaps you could get somebody to help you?
