Author Topic: (ontological) Naturewatch.  (Read 8643 times)

How would you describe yourself?

Athiest
5 (26.3%)
abrahamic monotheist
4 (21.1%)
pantheist
0 (0%)
scientific pantheist
0 (0%)
agnostic
2 (10.5%)
materialist
0 (0%)
antitheist
2 (10.5%)
polytheist
0 (0%)
panentheist
1 (5.3%)
other
5 (26.3%)

Total Members Voted: 17

Author Topic: (ontological) Naturewatch.  (Read 8643 times)

Gordon

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 18266
Re: (ontological) Naturewatch.
« Reply #50 on: April 05, 2016, 06:29:32 PM »
Gordon I have said that what I am doing here is non statistical and my assessment. People have a right to judge it for themselves and I am not claiming accuracy. Your response therefore seems like a piece of pompous prickery designed to besmirch.......am I wrong?

Yep, you are - was just trying to help, Vlad, as I did yesterday by adding stuff to your list, since I realised you couldn't see everyone who was around.

Obviously I shouldn't have bothered.

Walt Zingmatilder

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 33187
Re: (ontological) Naturewatch.
« Reply #51 on: April 05, 2016, 06:34:06 PM »
Yep, you are - was just trying to help
Well then you have my complete and unbridled apology.

Sorry to trouble you.

Walt Zingmatilder

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 33187
Re: (ontological) Naturewatch.
« Reply #52 on: April 05, 2016, 06:50:54 PM »

Users On forum at 18:48

27 Guests, 8 Users (2 Hidden)

Users active in past 15 minutes:
6 named 1 Christian, 5 atheist.*

Source: religionethics  *my assessment.

SqueakyVoice

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2446
  • Life. Don't talk to me about life.
Re: (ontological) Naturewatch.
« Reply #53 on: April 05, 2016, 07:08:09 PM »
Users active in last 15minutes 49.
Chunsty 1, Users who think Chunsty's paranoia is getting a bit OTT 48.
"Let us think the unthinkable, let us do the undoable, let us prepare to grapple with the ineffable itself, and see if we may not eff it after all" - D Adams

Walt Zingmatilder

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 33187
Re: (ontological) Naturewatch.
« Reply #54 on: April 05, 2016, 07:14:53 PM »
Users active in last 15minutes 49.
Chunsty 1, Users who think Chunsty's paranoia is getting a bit OTT 48.
You love it.

Sebastian Toe

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7719
Re: (ontological) Naturewatch.
« Reply #55 on: April 06, 2016, 01:18:18 AM »
Stop being a titfer goodness sake.
Nihonshu?
"The word God is for me nothing more than the expression and product of human weaknesses, the Bible a collection of honourable, but still primitive legends.'
Albert Einstein

Walt Zingmatilder

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 33187
Re: (ontological) Naturewatch.
« Reply #56 on: April 06, 2016, 11:10:14 AM »

Walt Zingmatilder

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 33187
Re: (ontological) Naturewatch.
« Reply #57 on: April 07, 2016, 07:07:08 PM »
Vlad will return in From Russell With Love

Étienne d'Angleterre

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 757
Re: (ontological) Naturewatch.
« Reply #58 on: April 07, 2016, 08:32:52 PM »
Vlad will return in From Russell With Love

By the way. I have voted other so in your regular updates don't include me in atheist. Thank you.

jeremyp

  • Admin Support
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 32495
  • Blurb
    • Sincere Flattery: A blog about computing
Re: (ontological) Naturewatch.
« Reply #59 on: April 08, 2016, 09:59:46 AM »
There is an atheist option.  Atheists are leading in the poll at the moment.
No there isn't. There's anti theist which is not the same thing and there is an option for the people who are the most "athy" whatever that is.
This post and all of JeremyP's posts words certified 100% divinely inspired* -- signed God.
*Platinum infallibility package, terms and conditions may apply

Udayana

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5478
  • βε ηερε νοω
    • The Byrds - My Back Pages
Re: (ontological) Naturewatch.
« Reply #60 on: April 08, 2016, 12:56:43 PM »
 Go Agnostics!
Ah, but I was so much older then ... I'm younger than that now

Shaker

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 15639
Re: (ontological) Naturewatch.
« Reply #61 on: April 08, 2016, 12:57:27 PM »
Pain, or damage, don't end the world. Or despair, or fucking beatings. The world ends when you're dead. Until then, you got more punishment in store. Stand it like a man, and give some back. - Al Swearengen, Deadwood.

Sassy

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11080
Re: (ontological) Naturewatch.
« Reply #62 on: April 10, 2016, 10:38:51 AM »
Messianic Christian/Jew was not up there. Or don't they exist for poll purposes in ontological nature watch?

Are you saying that all in existence is because of God... <tongue in cheek smiley>

We know we have to work together to abolish war and terrorism to create a compassionate  world in which Justice and peace prevail. Love ;D   Einstein
 "Science without religion is lame, religion without science is blind."

Sebastian Toe

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7719
Re: (ontological) Naturewatch.
« Reply #63 on: April 10, 2016, 10:42:41 AM »
Messianic Christian/Jew was not up there. Or don't they exist for poll purposes in ontological nature watch?


Maybe some or all of the 'other' votes are for Messianic Christian/Jew.
 :)
"The word God is for me nothing more than the expression and product of human weaknesses, the Bible a collection of honourable, but still primitive legends.'
Albert Einstein