Author Topic: (ontological) Naturewatch.  (Read 8667 times)

How would you describe yourself?

Athiest
5 (26.3%)
abrahamic monotheist
4 (21.1%)
pantheist
0 (0%)
scientific pantheist
0 (0%)
agnostic
2 (10.5%)
materialist
0 (0%)
antitheist
2 (10.5%)
polytheist
0 (0%)
panentheist
1 (5.3%)
other
5 (26.3%)

Total Members Voted: 17

« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2 3   Go Down

Author Topic: (ontological) Naturewatch.  (Read 8667 times)

Walt Zingmatilder

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 33187
(ontological) Naturewatch.
« on: April 04, 2016, 03:09:35 PM »
On forum at 15.07

1 Christian, 1 panentheist, 6 atheist  ( my assessment. )
Logged

Aruntraveller

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11078
Re: (ontological) Naturewatch.
« Reply #1 on: April 04, 2016, 03:14:31 PM »
Why haven't you included the option of antitheist as you use the descriptor so readily?
Logged
Before we work on Artificial Intelligence shouldn't we address the problem of natural stupidity.

Shaker

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 15639
Re: (ontological) Naturewatch.
« Reply #2 on: April 04, 2016, 03:15:58 PM »
Too much overlap between categories. You don't have to be an atheist or an agnostic, or a scientific pantheist or a materialist - they're perfectly compatible with each other.
Logged
Pain, or damage, don't end the world. Or despair, or fucking beatings. The world ends when you're dead. Until then, you got more punishment in store. Stand it like a man, and give some back. - Al Swearengen, Deadwood.

Walt Zingmatilder

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 33187
Re: (ontological) Naturewatch.
« Reply #3 on: April 04, 2016, 03:19:42 PM »
Quote from: Trentvoyager on April 04, 2016, 03:14:31 PM
Why haven't you included the option of antitheist as you use the descriptor so readily?
I have now included it.
Logged

Walt Zingmatilder

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 33187
Re: (ontological) Naturewatch.
« Reply #4 on: April 04, 2016, 03:20:32 PM »
Quote from: Shaker on April 04, 2016, 03:15:58 PM
Too much overlap between categories. You don't have to be an atheist or an agnostic, or a scientific pantheist or a materialist - they're perfectly compatible with each other.
You are at liberty to do your own.
Logged

Walt Zingmatilder

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 33187
Re: (ontological) Naturewatch.
« Reply #5 on: April 04, 2016, 03:22:41 PM »
On forum as at 15.22

8 atheist, 1 panentheist, 1 Christian.  ( My assessment )
Logged

Walt Zingmatilder

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 33187
Re: (ontological) Naturewatch.
« Reply #6 on: April 04, 2016, 03:26:57 PM »
on forum at 15.27

8 atheists, 1 Christian, 1 panentheist, 1 arsehole (My assessment)
Logged

Walt Zingmatilder

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 33187
Re: (ontological) Naturewatch.
« Reply #7 on: April 04, 2016, 03:38:46 PM »
On forum at 15.39

1 Christian, 8 atheist.
Logged

Enki

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3870
Re: (ontological) Naturewatch.
« Reply #8 on: April 04, 2016, 03:42:06 PM »
On forum now.

All I get is 1 vote for monotheist. None for any other category. Antitheist category isn't there. ???
Logged
Sometimes I wish my first word was 'quote,' so that on my death bed, my last words could be 'end quote.'
Steven Wright

Walt Zingmatilder

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 33187
Re: (ontological) Naturewatch.
« Reply #9 on: April 04, 2016, 03:45:21 PM »
Quote from: enki on April 04, 2016, 03:42:06 PM
On forum now.

All I get is 1 vote for monotheist. None for any other category. Antitheist category isn't there. ???
I have tried to add it twice but it doesn't seem to be showing. Sorry to hear your vote isn't going where you want it. Not being a moderator I have no control over this.
Logged

Enki

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3870
Re: (ontological) Naturewatch.
« Reply #10 on: April 04, 2016, 03:45:36 PM »
On forum now.

Hang on, it's changed.
All I get now is 2 votes for monotheist. None for any other category. Antitheist category still isn't there. ???

I have no intention of voting as it just seems to be an example of piss taking. Also, no other votes seem to show up at all, so what would be the point?
« Last Edit: April 04, 2016, 03:49:42 PM by enki »
Logged
Sometimes I wish my first word was 'quote,' so that on my death bed, my last words could be 'end quote.'
Steven Wright

Gordon

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 18266
Re: (ontological) Naturewatch.
« Reply #11 on: April 04, 2016, 03:47:38 PM »
Quote from: Jonique Anoo on April 04, 2016, 03:45:21 PM
I have tried to add it twice but it doesn't seem to be showing. Sorry to hear your vote isn't going where you want it. Not being a moderator I have no control over this.

Vlad

Would you like me to add 'antitheist' for you?
Logged

Étienne d'Angleterre

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 757
Re: (ontological) Naturewatch.
« Reply #12 on: April 04, 2016, 03:48:40 PM »
Quote from: Jonique Anoo on April 04, 2016, 03:45:21 PM
I have tried to add it twice but it doesn't seem to be showing. Sorry to hear your vote isn't going where you want it. Not being a moderator I have no control over this.

Can we have one for swivel-eyed antitheist :)

Always makes me smile.
Logged

Shaker

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 15639
Re: (ontological) Naturewatch.
« Reply #13 on: April 04, 2016, 03:53:31 PM »
Stalinist too please!
Logged
Pain, or damage, don't end the world. Or despair, or fucking beatings. The world ends when you're dead. Until then, you got more punishment in store. Stand it like a man, and give some back. - Al Swearengen, Deadwood.

Enki

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3870
Re: (ontological) Naturewatch.
« Reply #14 on: April 04, 2016, 04:00:26 PM »
 How about 'Turd Polisher' as well? Mind you, that would probably conflict with certain other categories :)
Logged
Sometimes I wish my first word was 'quote,' so that on my death bed, my last words could be 'end quote.'
Steven Wright

Walt Zingmatilder

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 33187
Re: (ontological) Naturewatch.
« Reply #15 on: April 04, 2016, 04:02:36 PM »
Quote from: Gordon on April 04, 2016, 03:47:38 PM
Vlad

Would you like me to add 'antitheist' for you?
Please and panentheist and polytheist.
Logged

Walt Zingmatilder

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 33187
Re: (ontological) Naturewatch.
« Reply #16 on: April 04, 2016, 04:05:01 PM »
Quote from: Shaker on April 04, 2016, 03:53:31 PM
Stalinist too please!
You are perfectly at liberty to start your own.
Logged

SqueakyVoice

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2446
  • Life. Don't talk to me about life.
Re: (ontological) Naturewatch.
« Reply #17 on: April 04, 2016, 04:08:13 PM »
I'd describe myself as a lover, not a fighter.
Logged
"Let us think the unthinkable, let us do the undoable, let us prepare to grapple with the ineffable itself, and see if we may not eff it after all" - D Adams

Dicky Underpants

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4369
Re: (ontological) Naturewatch.
« Reply #18 on: April 04, 2016, 04:10:11 PM »
Quote from: Jonique Anoo on April 04, 2016, 04:05:01 PM
You are perfectly at liberty to start your own.

Two who voted 'other' have been wiped out. They appear to have been relocated to the 'antitheist' category. This is assuming too much.
Logged
"Generally speaking, the errors in religion are dangerous; those in philosophy only ridiculous.”

Le Bon David

Walt Zingmatilder

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 33187
Re: (ontological) Naturewatch.
« Reply #19 on: April 04, 2016, 04:12:09 PM »
Quote from: Dicky Underpants on April 04, 2016, 04:10:11 PM
Two who voted 'other' have been wiped out. They appear to have been relocated to the 'antitheist' category. This is assuming too much.
I have no control over the mechanics of voting at all. Sorry.
Logged

Gordon

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 18266
Re: (ontological) Naturewatch.
« Reply #20 on: April 04, 2016, 04:13:07 PM »
Quote from: Jonique Anoo on April 04, 2016, 04:02:36 PM
Please and panentheist and polytheist.

OK - I've done that, but I think we'll leave it there since I'll be out and about later.

Just a helpful note for your count - if you are looking at Users Online it is the case some members have their online status hidden: there are more online than you can see right now.
Logged

Nearly Sane

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 64327
Re: (ontological) Naturewatch.
« Reply #21 on: April 04, 2016, 04:15:46 PM »
Quote from: Dicky Underpants on April 04, 2016, 04:10:11 PM
Two who voted 'other' have been wiped out. They appear to have been relocated to the 'antitheist' category. This is assuming too much.


Looks like a glitch. The others were in the line that used to have otheras the title, with  the extra choices going in the votes have stayed on that line  but the titles have moved down.
« Last Edit: April 04, 2016, 04:18:01 PM by Nearly Sane »
Logged

Walt Zingmatilder

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 33187
Re: (ontological) Naturewatch.
« Reply #22 on: April 04, 2016, 04:21:10 PM »
Quote from: Stephen Taylor on April 04, 2016, 03:48:40 PM
Can we have one for swivel-eyed antitheist
No you'll have to make do with antitheist and just roll your eyes around a bit.
Logged

Étienne d'Angleterre

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 757
Re: (ontological) Naturewatch.
« Reply #23 on: April 04, 2016, 04:23:39 PM »
Quote from: Jonique Anoo on April 04, 2016, 04:21:10 PM
No you'll have to make do with antitheist and just roll your eyes around a bit.

Tried it but my monocle fell out :(
Logged

bluehillside Retd.

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 19469
Re: (ontological) Naturewatch.
« Reply #24 on: April 04, 2016, 04:55:42 PM »
Presumably Trollboy will be providing a glossary some time soon so we can figure out whether he means the standard meanings of these terms or the idiosyncratic reinventions of them he needs to construct his endless straw men rebuttals?
Logged
"Don't make me come down there."

God
Pages: [1] 2 3   Go Up
« previous next »